The Wolves are Howling Again

Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

November 11, 2018

Scripture Reading:  Judges 10:6-9:

6) “And the children of Israel did evil AGAIN in the sight of the LORD, and served Baalim, and Ashtaroth, and the gods of Syria, and the gods of Sidon, and the gods of Moab, and the gods of the children of Ammon, and the gods of the Philistines, and forsook the LORD, and served not him.

7) And the anger of the LORD was HOT against Israel, and he sold them into the hands of the Philistines, and into the hands of the children of Ammon.

8) And that year they vexed and oppressed the children of Israel—eighteen years, all the children of Israel who were on the other side of the Jordan in the land of the Amorites, which is in Gilead.

9) Moreover, the children of Ammon passed over the Jordan to fight also against Judah, and against Benjamin, and against the house of Ephraim; so that Israel was very much distressed.”

This was the situation that caused many tribes of Israel to be under servitude of the Philistines and Ammonites for 18 years. They were in servitude until they “cried unto the LORD, saying, We have sinned against thee, because we have forsaken our God, and also served Baalim” (Judges 10:10b).

God, at first, told His people to “Go and cry unto the gods which ye have chosen; let them deliver you in the time of your tribulation” (Judges 10:14). He added that He would deliver the descendants of Jacob no more (Judges 10:13b). But after Israel put away the foreign gods from among them and served their LORD; and God was grieved for the misery of Israel (Judges 10:15, 16).

Would the LORD God of Israel tell His people the same thing today? Don’t pray to Me but pray to the international, interracial god that you serve. I warned you what would happen if you didn’t listen to My commands, but you wouldn’t listen. You haven’t read my Law and the few that do, you say are racist and are haters of God. The enemies rule over you with their usury, media and universal theological interpretations, and you believe them over Me.

What was the evil that Israel had done in the sight of the LORD? The Scripture does not specifically tell us in this passage of Scripture, but it says that the sin made the anger of the LORD become hot against Israel.

But it is very similar to what happened earlier in Israel’s history. Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD that caused them to be put into captivity for eight years to the Mesopotamians. The sin that Israel committed also made their LORD to be hot against them and put them into captivity.

Judges 3:7-8:

7) “And the children of Israel did evil in the sight of the LORD, and forgot the LORD their God, and served Baalim and the idols.

8) There the anger of the LORD was HOT against Israel, and he sold them into the hand of Cushan-rishathaim, king of Mesopotamia; and the children on Israel served Cushan-rishathaim eight years.”

What was the sin that was responsible for causing Israel’s God to be hot against them? Verses 5 and 6 tells that it was interracial marriages! The six pronouns in verse six are replaced by the nouns that they represent.

Judges 3:5-6:

5) “And the children of Israel dwelt among the Canaanites, Hittites, and Amorites, and Perizzites, and Hivites, and Jebusites:

6) And they [the Israelites] took their [the Canaanites’] daughters to be their [the Israelites’] wives, and gave their [the Israelites’] daughters to their [the Canaanites’] sons, and served their [the Canaanites’] gods.”

Notice that the 2 1/2  tribes of Israel that dwelt on the eastern side of the Jordon, lived in the land that was formerly controlled by the Amorites. Moab dwelt in the southern portion of this land but were either killed or driven south of the Arnon River by the Amorites.

After Israel was delivered from this servitude they once again committed evil in the sight of the LORD and they were put in servitude to Moab for 18 years. But after the children of Israel cried unto the LORD, the LORD raised up a deliverer who freed them from the Moabites and they had rest for 80 years.

JOHN PIPER’S REVERSAL

I was sent a book via email that was written by John Piper. He is one of the leaders of reformed theology and he has already written twenty-eight books. He is a Calvinistic preacher, who is a member of the Reformed Presbyterian Church. The book that I received was entitled, “Bloodlines; Race, Cross, and the Christian.”

He was born in 1946; four years after I was born. He lived his youth in Greeneville, South Carolina and when he was sixteen years old his home church voted to not allow Blacks into their services! Was the church he was a member of a racist church, or was there Scripture which told the church that they were to be separate? Is being separate and racist the same thing? He lived in the middle of America’s separatism. He confesses that he was a Southern racist.

Well, what changed John Piper from a racist to an integrationist; from a separatist to a person that promotes interracial marriages? Piper writes when he was a senior in college [Wheaton College in Illinois, that was founded by evangelical abolitionists] that he and his future wife went to the great Urbana Missions Conference in December 1967. At that meeting there was a question that was answered by a former missionary to Pakistan during a question-and-answer time before thousands of students.

The student’s question:

“What if your daughter falls in love with a Pakistani while you’re on the mission field and wants to marry him?”

This was a very important question to Mr. Piper, for he writes that one of the unshakeable reasons why segregation was right to him was the perceived wrongness of interracial marriage. And this question dealt with interracial marriage—was it right or wrong?

The former Pakistani missionary’s answer: “Better a Christian Pakistani than a godless white American!”

Piper admits that this answer had a great impact on both him and his future wife. This answer was the changing moment in their lives. But you won’t find this answer in the Bible. It is found in the writings of the enemies of the LORD God of Israel. He didn’t consider that the Pakistani in question was not a descendant of Jacob/Israel and therefore not a part of the elect. And if he was not of the elect, the Calvinist would have to believe that his destiny was not good. Failure to understand that Jesus came “to remember the covenant,” and the Apostle Paul said that Jesus the Christ came to “confirm the covenant” (Romans 15:8) is the view which is missing from the mainstream churches. Without this knowledge, the churches have opened their doors to everyone without exception. Why would Jesus “remember and confirm the covenant” if the covenant wasn’t important?

Piper then admits that in 1971, he wrote a research paper on Interracial Marriage. The professor approved of his exegesis and gave him a grade of A- on it. Piper writes that this biblical study on interracial marriage that he did in seminary was to him a settling of the matter. He has not gone back from what he saw there. The Bible, he says, does not oppose or forbid interracial marriages, but sees them as a positive good for the glory of Christ. What verse in the Holy Scripture backs this up? Interracial marriage is a positive for the glory of Christ…what nonsense is this?

Ancient Israel was forbidden by their God to marry the people who lived near or around them. Anyone who did so, and there were quite a few, their offspring was forever ruined. None of them were ever said, in the Bible, to be a servant of God. Can a Israelite today marry the same people that they were forbidden to marry in the past?

DOES THE BIBLE OPPOSE INTERRACIAL MARRIAGES?

October 30th was the 90th birthday of author Richard Hoskins. He says that he is the oldest of all his relatives, in time of life, for 403 years. Four hundred three years ago—that is 1615! There are very few of us that can say that. He has written these following five books. I would recommend that every one of our people get these books and read them:

1. The Wolf and the Sheep
2. War Cycles Peace Cycles
3. In the Beginning
4. Our Nordic Race
5. Vigilantes of Christendom

Plus, he wrote 25 years of the Hoskin’s Report. This report reached the homes of readers that informed them of what he had learned as he read all the Scriptures. Hoskins revealed to his audience the things that he learned about history and law that the churches, schools and media had either ignored or had taught was completely wrong. He reveals, from his research, what really happened in history, is exactly what the Bible said would happen. The “last shall be first” means something.

Dick Hoskins was reared as a Baptist and, after he took a religion class in college, he became an atheist. He then took to the bottle too much and became an alcoholic. His drinking affected his nervous system and he became unable to work for more than a couple of hours a day. He even contemplated suicide.

He knew Jerry Falwell before he became the preacher of the local church in Lynchburg, Virginia. Both of their wives worked at the same bank and Dick and Jerry would sit together as they waited for them to come out from their place of labor on Friday evenings. They developed a friendship.

So, what happened? Richard made a covenant with the LORD God of Israel when he didn’t even know who God was. He asked that if He would enable him to work a full day, then he would seek after Him. So, Richard began to read the Bible. He had had a multitude of family Bibles in his home all his life, but he had never read the Bible, except for a few scattered verses.

And when he read the Bible, his eyes were opened, and his life was changed dramatically. He was never the same person again. It was like what happened to Elizabeth Dilling who, after she saw what was happening in Communist Russia, she read the Bible and learned about what it said about her religion’s enemies. She hadn’t been told in her Episcopal church what the enemy would do and be or who they even were. She went around the nation speaking to her people who, basically didn’t believe her, even though she quoted from the enemies own “holy books.” She learned from their own books, one of which is the Talmud, that the leaders of the Communist Party hated her Savior and said that He was now in hell! Her most famous book is entitled, “The Plot Against Christianity.”

Richard Hoskins, as he read the Bible, learned that he was called to be a “priest and king.” A king was not to drink alcohol for it would damage his ability to make proper judgments. Richard then put away the bottle and he has only had a half glass of beer since that day. His drinking days were over.

He learned that the banks in Christian lands were forbidden to charge usury to their brothers. So, when the church in which Jerry Falwell was pastor issued bonds, Richard approached him in private and told him what he had read in the Scripture. But Falwell ignored what Richard had told him and continued selling the bonds. Soon, Richard was without a church, but he had learned the secret of who:

• has caused the major wars during the last 200 years.
• manipulated the people of the North to hate the demonized people of the South.
• manipulated the people of the United States to hate their demonized kin of Germany.
• hid the truth from Christians as to what the revolutionary forces were doing to their demonized Christian brothers in Russia.

Richard learned many more truths of the Bible. For example:

“Wolves eat sheep. That’s what they do. In order to eat sheep, wolves must gain entry into the sheepfold.

If you run all of the wolves out of the sheepfold, they will immediately try to get back in. Because if they cannot get into the sheepfold, they cannot eat sheep. And that’s what wolves do—wolves eat sheep.

Sheep try to keep from being eaten by wolves. To put it another way: sheep don’t hate wolves. There is almost no anti-wolfism in the land today. Sheep just have an unreasoning fear of being eaten.”

If more sheep listened to their good shepherd, they would hate the wolves and forbid them from entering their sheepfold. But the Bible is a closed book to most of the sheep. Most sheep are either lacking a shepherd or a good shepherd. At one time most of the city, states and countries of Europe kicked the wolves out of their country. England did it from 1290-1660!

Back to Richard’s words:

“Catholic priest reformers began questioning [about 500] years ago whether or not the church was in truth authorized to be the one who ‘rules as God.’ The Word was their monopoly. It took wars and millions of dead to release the Word that ‘Saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us’—from being hidden. At last the Shepherd’s Word was pried out of their tight grasp to save us from the wolves.

The reformers opened the Scriptures, taught the Word briefly, and then the establishment church, both Protestant and Catholic, aided by the gleeful wolves, slammed the book shut again to prevent the Word from pulling them from their gold-plated mountains where they lived. They meant to keep the blood-money wrung from the sheep who put faith in their magic. Their pretense of being ‘he rules for God’ was to continue for a while longer.

Beginning some two decades ago [this book was written in 2002], the Word once again began to escape the clutches of the ecclesiastics. The sheep who had been attacked and were bleeding, asked WHY? Why was the Word not held high to protect them? WHO was concealing it? Why did the ones who claimed that they were ‘he who rules as God’--why did they not protect the sheep?

These questions are being asked today and they are causing consternation in the establishment churches. Magic-wolves, thieves, sodomites, whoremongers, and false-priests have all closed ranks with the wolf-packs to protect their stolen prey from being regained by the sheep. Both pulpit and wolf-howl grind out dis-information and lies so that the sheep will not discover that neither of them are who they say they are. Their efforts have succeeded in turning many of the sheep away from their Shepherd.

They tell the flock one thing while the Word tells the opposite. These predators know that the flock can only act on what is fed into its data banks. If they are fed only lies—they can only act on lies. Churches who insist on teaching the Word are punished by having their tax exemption removed [if they are 501c3 churches]. To protect their tax-exemption, most establishment churches have turned inward to commune with their emptiness. God’s sheep have deserted the establishment church in droves in their quest to discover ‘The Word that was God.’

Now, most tall steeples signify nothing but a monument of the dead communing with their dead. They do not teach the Law, statutes, and Judgments of the Word. They do this to comply with wolf-policy. Many of them consider the wolves as ‘he rules as God.’ Others consider the wolves to be god on earth.”

The Baptist Church that I was brought up in, when I was young, taught the Law of God was nailed to the cross of Jesus Christ. It was abolished. We were no longer under the Law of God. We are now living in Grace. So, we were free to eat any food that we wanted…including pig, shrimp, catfish, hog, bear, camel, elephant, gorilla, groundhog, hippopotamus, kangaroo, rabbit, monkey, mouse, porcupine, raccoon, rat, rhinoceros, skunk, squirrel, coyote, dog, fox, wolf, cat, leopard, lion, panther, tiger, horse, mule, zebra, shark, sturgeon, swordfish, dolphin, otter, porpoise, seal, walrus, whale, clam, crab, oyster, lobster, scallop, octopus, jellyfish, slug, snail, worm, frog, salamander, alligator, crocodile, lizard, snake, turtle, etc.

I ate a lot of pig and hog—swine flesh; bacon, pork chops, pepperoni, sausages, ham (every Easter), bacon, lettuce and tomato sandwiches, pork fillings in green beans. I loved shrimp cocktail and fried clams. At one special meal I was served a small can of tiger meat as a appetizer and had as the entrée—lobster, flown straight from San Francisco and cooked the same day. The only time that I ever ate these two unclean animals was at this meal of the parents of one of my golf players that I coached in high school. They invited me to their house to eat as a reward to our second-place finish in the Kentucky State Tournament.

I ate rabbit and squirrel that my Baptist pastor had shot, and his wife fixed in the kitchen. I had oyster dressing at home and ate catfish once when I was at an Alabama restaurant. This all stopped when I discovered what the Word said about clean and unclean foods.

Hoskins continues:

“Churches refuse to teach many Bible quotes today for fear of offending the establishment. [For example: Is God sovereign and does He alone save His people, or is man sovereign and does he have to come forward and do something to save himself?] Biblical law should be held up: if it is in the Bible, it is in there for a purpose. It fits together perfectly. To leave out major subjects is to do a disservice. It distorts the Word…It is obvious to the wolf that the world-views of wolf and sheep are absolutely incompatible and alien to each other.”

This takes us back to the question that we asked earlier: Does the Bible teach anything about interracial marriage? Should a sheep marry a wolf? Can a wolf be changed into a sheep?

Richard Hoskins writes in Vigilantes of Christendom on page 131:

“God absolutely forbids racial intermarriage. The Word teaches:

1. “Thou shalt not take a wife…of the Canaanites…but thou shall go…to my kindred, and take a wife” Genesis 24:3, 4.
2. “We have trespassed against our God, and have taken strange (nokrly—alien) wives of the people of the land” Nehemiah 13:23-27.
3. “They have dealt treacherously against the Lord; for they have begotten strange (zowr) children” Hosea 5:7.
4. (Ezra the priest stood and said) “Ye have transgressed, and have taken strange wives…now…separate yourselves from the people of the land and from the strange wives…until the wrath of our God for this matter be turned from us” Ezra 10:10-14.
5. “Neither shalt thou make marriages with them: thy daughter thou shalt not give unto his son, nor his daughter shalt thou take unto thy son” Deuteronomy 7:3.
6. “We have trespassed against our God, and have taken strange (nokrly) wives…therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and such as are born of them, according to the …commandment of our God” Ezra 10:2.

And that is only six references. But that should be more than enough to prove what our God says about this important issue. I gave a seventh in the early part of this article. And there are many more. And if the Bible has so many references about what is wrong with interracial marriages, why don’t we hear about them in the schools, media and especially in the churches? The answer is simple: We are enslaved in our own nation. The schools, media and even our churches are controlled by the state. They say one thing; the Bible says the opposite.

MEGYN KELLY IS FIRED AGAIN

Megyn Kelly was fired from NBC after she commented that during her high school days, it was no big deal if someone wore a blackface, if it depicted someone—like Diana Ross. The wolf-media suddenly began to howl all together. Even Al Roker, who is the regular weather guy on the Today Show which airs before Megyn’s, gave his disapproval of her comment. He, nevertheless, found himself having to defend his choice of Halloween costume—Emmett “Doc” Brown from the “Back to the Future” movies, a white character, after the blackface flap that led to the firing of his former co-host Megyn Kelly from the show. She will probably get most, if not all, of her $69,000,000 she is owed from her show! How crazy was this?

Were the sheep told the whole story? Was there more to it? Megyn was on her way out, anyway. This was a way for her boss to eliminate her now. They were dissatisfied with her and wanted to replace her.

And the wolf-media was silent on who wore the blackface in the entertainment business. The king of the “blackface” was Al Jolson. And who was “Al Jolson?” His real name was Asa Yoelson. He was an American singer, comedian, and stage and film actor. At the peak of his career, he was dubbed “The World’s Greatest Entertainer.” He has also been called “the king of blackface” performers. With his dynamic style of singing black music, such as jazz and blues, he became widely successful by extracting black music and popularizing it for white American audiences who were otherwise not receptive to the originators. Asa Yoelson was born in a Jewish village of Srednike, Lithuania, part of the Russian Empire.

Yoelson [Jolson], whose father became a rabbi, performed exclusively in blackface until 1931.  Performing in blackface  makeup was a theatrical convention of many entertainers at the beginning of the 20th century, having its origin in the minstrel show.  

The media says that it was the white man who wore the blackface as an insult to the Blacks, while the truth was that the greatest entertainer in the business was a Canaanite/Jew who was the king of blackface. Not one word from the Wolf-media that it was Jews who mainly wore blackface in the entertainment world.

Asa was divorced three times; had four wives. He died in 1950 when I was 8 years old. Our neighborhood, a few years before he died, had a talent show in the basement of our next-door neighbor’s home. My older brother, who was more outgoing than me, dressed up in blackface and danced like a “crazy man.” He was the hit of the show. We still have it on 8 mm. film.

Now who is the man who made the decision on Meghan Kelly? In recent months, prior to the recent controversy, tensions had been growing between Kelly and NBC News management. Sources with knowledge of the situation say that NBC News chairman Andy Lack disapproved of Kelly aggressively covering stories about sexual harassment on her show, particularly related to disgraced anchor Matt Lauer [Canaanite/Jew], who was fired last November.

Andy Lack was born in New York City to a Canaanite/Jewish family. He attended Browning, a private school in New York, studied at the Sorbonne, University of Paris and graduated from Boston University’s College of Fine Arts in 1968.  After graduation, he appeared as an actor in numerous television commercials and an off-Broadway production.

DONESHA GOWDY

The now-12-year-old, Donesha Gowdy, will receive a $220,000 payout from the city of Cincinnati, and an additional $20,000 from Kroger’s Grocery Store to be used for her emotional care. On August 6th of this year, Donesha and a couple of her girlfriends rode their bikes to the local Kroger to get snacks and other supplies via shoplifting. Put more simply, she was going to Kroger’s to steal. She had been caught before and was warned about shoplifting. This time she stole $53.81 worth of clothing, food and drinks. She put all the stolen material into a stolen backpack. [If our courts were under God’s law, she would have to pay back $107.62 to Kroger’s or work the amount of money off. If she refused, she would be executed.]

As the girls were leaving the local Krogers, Cincinnati Police Office Kevin Brown, who was employed by Kroger to monitor shoplifting, caught them. He tried to stop Donesha, but she started to run away. He didn’t want to tackle her, as she weighed only 90 pounds. He asked her to stop, but she ignored him. It was the second time that she was caught stealing, so he shot her with a tazer.

The mother, who has 10 children from eight different fathers, gets assistance from the state for housing, food and other necessities. It would be the girl’s second time caught for shoplifting, so she has, no doubt, done a lot more theft without being caught. It doesn’t seem what the mother told her after she was caught the first time had much affect. The officer, who also was black, said to the young girl:

“You know sweetheart, this is why there’s no grocery stores in the Black community.”

At the end of it all, Cincinnati civil rights attorney Alponse Gerhardstein helped the family reach the settlement. How did she get this high-profile lawyer to take her case? She certainly couldn’t afford him. How much did the lawyer receive from the city and Kroger’s? None of the news articles told how much money he received—I guess it would have caused a complete uproar if it was found out. Why would a famous civil rights lawyer take this case?

The police officer was suspended without pay for a week, forbidden to have any other private work for four months, and his comment about the grocery store in the Black neighborhood was called racist. The police officer, remember, was black too! He made a racist statement to the black youngster?

The lawyer who negotiated the settlement was Al Gerhardstein and has been named attorney of the year for his work in civil rights by the Jewish National Fund Carl B. Rubin Legal Society.

Does anyone remember who else belongs to the Unitarian Universalists Church? Louise LeWarre, who I talked about a couple of sermons ago. She was a leader in the movement to help Jews in their community who had “suffered” in literature that was distributed in the driveways. They [both Louise and Alphonse] are involved in the same false church and the same organizations: like the Intercommunity Justice and Peace Center.

In April 2015, on the Sunday before the U.S. Supreme Court would hear historic arguments on the legalization of same-sex marriage, Cincinnati civil rights attorney and Unitarian Universalist Al Gerhardstein went to church. A Jew who doesn’t believe that Jesus the Christ is deity, went to a “Christian” church. Al had spent years advocating for the gay community and had suffered a crushing defeat in the 1990s when the Supreme Court declined to take on his case calling for an end to one of the most divisive issues in the history of Cincinnati – a ban on all laws that would protect the gay community from discrimination.

Universalism is a religion that believes that every two-legged being on the earth will be saved. This includes all the wheat and tares; all the sheep and wolves; all the people with a “holy seed” and all the beings with an “unholy seed.” It includes Jacob and his descendants, who God loves and Esau and his descendant, who God hates. It includes all Israelites and Jews.  Instead Universalists assert that all people will eventually be reconciled with God.  Universalists rejected the hellfire and damnation of the evangelical preachers, who tried to revive the fundamentalist Christianity of the early Pilgrim fathers. They get this notion from the interpreting the word “all” in several verses, for example in Corinthians and Romans, to mean every person on the face of the earth.

MURDER AT THE TREE OF LIFE

Squirrel Hill has had a large Jewish population since the 1920s, when Eastern European Jews began to move to the neighborhood in large numbers from Oakland and the Hill District. Many of them took up residence in rows of brick houses on the cross streets of Murray Avenue south of Forbes, such as Darlington Road, Bartlett Street, and Beacon Street. The neighborhood became the center of Jewish culture in the city, with kosher butcher shops, delicatessens, Jewish restaurants, bookstores, and designer boutiques. Several hundred Russian Jewish immigrants moved to the neighborhood in the 1990s. Jews do not have the ability nor want the ability to amalgamate together with others. They want their own “den.”

The killer, a man who said that “he wanted to kill Jews,” first was denied entering an all-black church. Question: Why would he go to an all-black church, if his desire was to kill Jews? On his internet was the statement that the father of the Jews was Satan (John 8:44).

I don’t know if anyone was murdered or not. I didn’t see any dead bodies, nor did I see any of the dead bodies being taken into ambulances or hearses. I didn’t see the shooter who was wounded in the legs. But I did see all the protestors singing and yelling at the President as he and his wife came to help in the grief of the families of the “dead” and the wounded first responders.

The name of the synagogue was “The Tree of Life” Synagogue. Have you ever heard of that phrase before? Was there a Tree of Life in the Bible? After the sin in the Garden, weren’t there angels that guarded against anyone returning to the Garden to eat of the Tree of Life? Then, isn’t there something strange about this name? The Jewish Tree of Life has a serpent that is coiled amongst the branches of the tree. Is that the Tree of Life that is in the Bible?

Most Judeo-Christians are proclaiming that: If you hate Jews, then you hate Jesus. The reason given for this statement is that Jesus was a Jew. But was He? That was the exact words that Brian Tome, pastor of Crossroads Church, said on the Bill Cunningham radio show, “Jesus was a Jew.”

Why was it that Esau was not granted repentance for marrying Canaanite wives, if the Canaanites were not evil? The children of Esau and these women were never a friend of Jacob/Israel. In fact, God says that He will always be at war with one of Esau’s grandsons.

Who are the descendants of Esau? One of his descendants was the king of Israel who attempted to kill the infant Jesus by slaying all the children under the age of two in Bethlehem and the surrounding towns. Other descendants became Pharisees. Others became Sadducees. Others became religious and political leaders in the country of Judea at the time of our LORD’s ministry. Who were they?

Who were the individuals that Jesus said:  John 7:1: “After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for He would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill Him.” ?
 

There are over 12 different times that the Bible identifies the Jews as plotting and attempting to execute the murder of Jesus the Christ. They even failed to successfully execute their murderous deed until the crucifixion. So, if we hate the Jews, then we hate Jesus? Since Jesus is against interracial marriages, and the Jews aren’t, because they are all mongrels, then why would Jesus have been a Jew? Jesus is not a mongrel or bastard as the Jews say in their Talmud. If you say Jesus was a Jew, you are saying that He was a mixed-seed bastard—for all Jews are mixed-seed.

The Jewish books say: “Miriam (Mary, mother of Jesus) was a dresser of women’s hair. She committed adultery with carpenters.” All rabbinical sources ascribe to Jesus, “illegitimate birth…the seducer was a soldier by the name of “Panthera”. In the Jewish Encyclopedia, Exhibit 277: “Jesus carried on with the SCRIBES who on the ground of that dispute declared Him to be a bastard.”

So, if we believe the “Jesus was a Jew”, do we believe that He was a bastard? And if He was a bastard as the Jews believe, was He also never resurrected and as they also say in their “holy books”, and that He attempted to seduce women, was excommunicated by a rabbi, and then worshipped a brick. He was said to be a seducer of Israel and practiced magic; (Sanhedrin 107b, Exhibit 117, and Jewish Encyclopedia, Exhibit 277.) And if Jesus had committed just ONE sin, He would have been disqualified from being the offering for His people! Jesus wasn’t and couldn’t be a Jew.

It seems to me that Israel’s Savior would have been an Israelite. Jesus was not a Jew; not an Ashkenazi Jew, nor a Sephardic Jew, nor a Hassidic Jew, nor an Orthodox Jew, nor a Reformed Jew, nor any other variation or denomination of a Jew. Another proof: Jesus heard the Words of His Father; the Jews do not and cannot… “Know them by their fruits.”

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.