Who Was the Father of Cain? Part 1


Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

November 5, 2023

Scripture Reading: John 10:26:

“But ye [Jews, verse 24] believe not, because ye [Jews] are not of My sheep, as I [Jesus] said unto you [Jews].

If the Jews are not one of Jesus’ sheep, then what does that mean? Doesn’t that mean that they have another different father than the Sheep have?  Didn’t Jesus tell them that:

John 8:38 “I [Jesus] speak that which I [Jesus] have seen with My Father; and ye [Jews, verse 31] do that which ye [Jews] have seen with your father.”

The Jews have a different father than Jesus had!  What father is that?  Was it possibly Adam or was it the serpent?  It couldn’t be Adam, because Adam is in Jesus’ genealogical family line. It had to come from the other seed line—Cain. 

There is a lot of confusion over the rather controversial teaching commonly called the “two-seedline doctrine” or the “Satanic-Cain-Canaanite-Edomite Seedline doctrine.”  The basic concept of seedline, or blood descent, is very prevalent within Scripture.  The Bible places great importance on such words as “children, son, father, seed, brethren, and generation.”It traces genealogies, records ancestry, and follows tribal lineage. 

The Bible, as we know it, would not even exist without the concept of a seedline.  In fact, Christianity could not legitimately exist without the concept of seedline.  The Messiah, the Kinsman Redeemer of Israel, was to come from a specific seedline, and if Jesus was not of this seedline, He is not the Messiah.  Thus, His seedline is carefully recorded in the Gospels. 

Genesis 3:15 is clear that there are two seedlines, one for the “serpent” (thy seed”) and the other for the “woman” (her seed”). The woman’s seed or Eve’s seed are the true Adamites descended from Seth, and later, the Israelites who are now the White Christian peoples.

The “serpent’s seed” are the descendants through Cain and now exists literally in the Jews. Thus, the Jews are the “serpent” race.  They have never and will never be “saved.”  They are the enemy of Jesus the Christ who say in their “unholy book” that He has dwelt since his crucifixion eternally in hell boiling in a hot cauldron!

The “serpent” of Genesis 3 was a fallen angel who had sexual intercourse with Eve, producing Cain.   Mark Downey, our late co-pastor, said that it wasn’t the devil that most Christians believe in; i.e., a non-created being.  I agree.  For the devil is a created being.  The devil was an anointed angel, who fell from the position when he went to war in heaven with one-third of the angels, against our God.

Pastor Mark said the following in another one of his sermons:

“The divinity of Jesus Christ is hated by the jews, because His genealogy, back to the first White man, Adam, was a seedline of racial purity.  The genealogy of jews is an ancestry of mingled seed whether it is traced as far back as Cain or to Esau or to Eastern European Ashkenazi jews, whom 95% of jewry are connected to and come from the Turko-Mongol Khazars of the 9th Century AD.  Genesis 3:15 is the distinction between the racially pure and the racially impure and the subsequent conflicts that would arise throughout history”(from the sermon, “Why We Hate Jews”, Part 3).

It is this statement above that causes me to believe that Mark believed Adam was not the father of Cain. For if Adam was the father of Cain, Cain would not be a mingled seed. [Editor's note: Pastor Mark never stated anywhere about who fathered Cain.]

Sheldon Emry said that he believed that the serpent was “some kind of intelligent being” but made it clear that Adam was the father of Cain.   Mark stated that he didn’t believe that Satan was the father of Cain either.  I never heard him say exactly who the father was, for I don’t think that he knew.  But I heard him say once that he thought it might be an unknown stranger or foreigner.  Mark was unique in his belief; for, as I understand it ... and I may be wrong, he believed that the father of Cain was neither the devil nor Adam [Editors note: this statement cannot be confirmed]. Nonetheless, Mark preached adamantly and never departed from this truth of the exclusiveness of Israel only.

But Mark also preached this:

“The Greek word for the New Testament devil is diabolos and simply means false accuser, calumniator, and slanderer.  Nowhere is it used of a superhuman-being tempting men to sin.  When Jesus spoke of the Pharisees being of their “father the devil,” Christ was speaking figuratively of the parent corporation “Babylon” from whence the ‘traditions of the elders’, or Judaism, came.”

But that confuses me.  The Jews or Edomites weren’t in Babylon until many years after Esau’s children were born.  I don’t understand how the Edomite Pharisees’ parent could be corporation "Babylon". When Esau married the Hittite wives, whose lineage goes back to Cain, it makes Esau’s offspring the same male parent as Cain’s.

Thus, the curse upon the serpent, along with its satanic traits and “enmity” pronounced by God, were carried on in Cain and his descendants.  This would make the Jews the offspring of the “serpent.”

One of the meanings of Genesis 3:15 is that there is a serpent race of people, now called the Jews, which have been at war with Adam’s descendants, now known as the White Christian peoples, since the Garden.  This conflict between these two “seedlines” is about to reach a climax, in which the serpent race will be crushed and destroyed by the true descendants of Adam and Seth.

The teaching that Adam is the father of Cain is helping the “Jews” in their effort to destroy our White Israel Race. Along with the preaching of Arminianism and Calvinism, the doctrine that there is no Satan (and Sheldon Emry didn’t teach that), and thereby Satan is not the father of anyone, including Cain, is nothing more than misdirecting our people from realizing who the identity of our major enemy is.

So, in this sermon today, we will look at some Scriptures, outside of the one that tells the story that occurred in the Garden.  For that story must coincide with the rest of the Scriptures.  Who was the father of Cain:  the serpent or Adam?


The curse of the “Wandering Jew” bears similarities to the curse placed upon Cain after his murder of Abel.  Besides decreeing that Cain would no longer be able to till the ground to produce crops, God said,

Genesis 4:14 “Behold, thou hast driven me [Cain] out this day from the face of the earth; and from thy face shall I [Cain] be hid; and I [Cain] shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that everyone that findeth me [Cain] shall slay me [Cain].”

Acts 19:13a: “Then certain of the vagabond Jews, exorcists, …”

The Jews have been wandering vagabonds especially after their capital city, Jerusalem, was destroyed by the Romans in 70 AD.  They journeyed all over the world, being expelled from a host of countries from time to time.  They had no homeland until 1948 when the United Nations gave them the land of Israeli, taking it from the Palestinians.

What country has the most Jews living in it in 2023?  The United States has a little greater number of Jews than Israeli.  Both these nations contain over 80% of all Jews in the world today.  No other nation comes close.  The closest any nation comes is about 1/15 of the population of the Jews in the United States and Israeli.  But Jews are found in 112 different nations in the world.

But they are not farmers.  They are accountants, tailors, merchants, politicians, teachers, lawyers, college professors, symphony conductors, rabbis, musicians, artists, singers, actors, cattle herders, instructors of brass and iron, owners of trading ships, small business owners, corporation CEOs, union organizers, smiths, usury bankers, financial advisors, writers, etc. 

They are descendants of Cain who suffered the same curse as their ancient father endured; that is, they cannot farm. And as a result they go from one place to another never residing in a homeland. They are wanderers, and they must be parasites who travel from country to country, from state to state, from city to city looking for someone to farm their food for them.  They are vagabonds.


Who were the first-born priests of Israel? Was it the first-born Cain or was it the second-born or first-born son Abel?  It all depends on who you think was the father of Cain, if you thought of it at all.

Numbers 3:11-12:

11) “And the LORD spake unto Moses, saying,

12) And I, behold, I have taken the Levites from among the children of Israel instead of all the firstborn that openeth the matrix among the children of Israel: therefore the Levites shall be mine;”

The priests of God, from the Garden until Aaron were the first-born sons. But when Moses went up the mount gathering the Ten Commandments, the people of Israel grew impatient and made themselves a golden calf.  There was also sensuous dancing and shouting.  When Moses came down he was angry at the impatient Israelites. 

Moses stood in the gate of the camp and said, “Who is on the LORD’s side?  Let him come unto me” (Exodus 32:26).Furthermore, who came?  It was the children of Levi that obeyed Moses and they slew their brothers; about three thousand men.

In Numbers 3:40-51 it records that the LORD told Moses to redeem the children of Levi for all the first-born of Israel.  In other words, there was a change being made in the priesthood.

So, from Adam to Moses the priests were the first-born.  So what did this verse mean in the book of Jude?

Jude 14 “And Enoch also, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh with ten thousands of His saints….”

Enoch was the seventh first-born son from Adam and was also the seventh priest. But if one turns to both Genesis 5:1-18 and Luke 3:37-38 and counts from Adam to Enoch, you can clearly see there are only six listed.

Genesis’ genealogy from Adam:

x) And all the days that Adam lived were 930 years; and he died.

  • Cain lived 730 years or Abel, who was murdered at a young age by Cain.
  • Seth lived 912 years,
  • Enos lived 905 years,
  • Cainan lived 910 years,
  • Mahalalee llived 895 years,
  • Jared lived 962 years,
  • Enoch lived 365 years, and God took him.

Luke’s genealogy from Adam:

x) Adam, son of God.

y)  Cain, which was the son of ?; or Abel, the son of Adam?

1) Seth, which was the son of Adam.

2) Enos, which was the son of Seth.

3) Cainan, which was the son of Enos.

4) Maleleel, which was the son of Cainan.

5) Jared, which was the son of Maleleel.

6) Enoch, which was the son of Jared.

It should be noted that both the Genesis and Luke accounts start with Seth and are missing either Cain or Abel.  Only one of them can fill the vacant spot.  And the first seven sons from Adam lived 900 or more years each, except for Mahalaleel who was five years short of 900, Enoch who was taken by God, and Abel who was murdered by Cain.

Without Cain and Abel, Enoch would only be the sixth from Adam. If Adam was the father of Cain, wouldn’t Cain, the oldest, be the priest and not Abel? And if Cain was disqualified as a priest for the murder he committed, then why wouldn’t his first-born son, also named Enoch, be made a priest to replace him?

If Adam had been Cain’s genetic father, the priesthood would have followed from Adam to:

  • Cain
  • Enoch
  • Irad
  • Mehujael
  • Methusael
  • Lamech
  • Jabal

But on the other hand, if Adam was not the father of Cain, but the father of righteous Abel, then the line would have followed Adam to:

  • Abel – murdered by Cain.
  • Seth, replaced Abel
  • Enos
  • Cainan
  • Mahalaleel
  • Jared
  • Enoch

Now there were many more sons born to all these patriarchs between Adam and Enoch, but only the first-born sons were born into the priesthood.

Genesis 4:25 “And Adam knew his wife again; and she bare a son, and called his name Seth: For God, said she, hath appointed me another seed instead (in place) of Abel, whom Cain slew.”

But since Seth was a replacement for Abel, we must insert Abel and not Cain as the first-born from Adam.  Cain, not being Adam’s legitimate son, did not need any replacement.

Had Adam been Cain’s genetic father, Cain would have had the right to offer a sacrifice, for Cain would have offered it for Abel. But Abel was a priest, for he was the first-born son of Adam. 

Cain’s father was the “serpent” of the Garden.  Cain was the first-born of the woman, Eve, and claimed the right of the first-born.  But Cain is not listed anywhere in Adam’s genealogy.  Cain tried to claim the right of the firstborn but failed when he attempted to compete with the true priest of God in the offering of a sacrifice to God.  Cain’s offering was rejected by God because he was not one of his priests.  Abel made an acceptable offering of a sacrificed lamb, while Cain’s offering was the fruit of the ground, which was unacceptable to God.  He was not His priest and he gave an unacceptable bloodless sacrifice. 


What was the reason for the flood of Noah?  Mongrelization. The hybridization of the Adamic people was caused by whom?  Sheldon Emry said in one of his tapes “Eve and the Serpent in the Garden”, “If Satan had sexual intercourse with Eve, why didn’t he do it to others?” 

But who committed the adultery with the many Adamite women who lived for almost one thousand years!  Certainly, the devil and the other fallen angels would be the first suspects.  And afterwards, these fallen angels were isolated in prison, bound with everlasting chains in complete darkness (1 Peter 3:19, 20, Jude 1:6).  There is a strong possibility that the fallen angels were imprisoned to prevent them from repeating their miscegenating sin that had been going on for many years.  And if that was not the reason for their being in prison, what was?

If Adam was the father of Cain, wouldn’t their seed also be eventually made hybrid by interracial marriages?  All the descendants of Adam, except for the small family of Noah, eventually became mixed breeds.  Noah and his three sons and their four wives were the only ones at that time, who were “perfect in their generations.”  So, if that is the case, then who would be the alien father who adulterated their seed?  It couldn’t be Adam!

But if Adam was the father of Cain, wouldn’t that mean that their descendants would be in the same condition as Seth’s and would have been destroyed in the massive flood that destroyed all the offspring of Adam except for Noah’s family.  Why would they be spared if they were the same as the other children of Adam?

Since there were not any of the descendants of Cain on the ark and yet, there were many of their lineage who survived the flood, we can surmise that they were a different seed line than Adam’s.  The Bible teaches that none of the descendants of Adam survived the flood, except the eight who were on the ark!

But the giants, who were their fathers, did survive.  But the descendants of Cain also did not drown in the flood.  The flood only killed the mongrel seed of the Adamites. It was not a worldwide flood.  The descendants of Adam were the only ones who were planted by God and therefore the only ones who were judged.

If Adam was the father of Cain, then how did they survive Noah’s flood?  If it was world-wide, they would have all drowned.  If it was a large local flood that destroyed all of Adam’s descendants, they would have drowned.   The only answer is that the raging waters did not kill the mongrel seed of the serpent-Cain; for they were not planted by God.

If Adam was the father of Cain, their descendants would be like the descendants of Seth, not the complete opposite.  They would be a part of the Adamic family, whether they turned out good or evil.  They would be the sheep of God.  But they were not sheep:

John 10:25, 26:

25) “Jesus answered them [Jews, verse 24], I told you [Jews], and ye [Jews] believed not: the works that I do in My Father’s name, they bear witness of Me.

26) But ye [Jews] believe not, because ye [Jews] are not of My sheep, as I said unto you [Jews].”

Jesus told His enemies directly that they could never believe, for they were not of His sheep.  Notice that it doesn’t say that the Jews are not of His sheep, because they do not believe, but He said the converse.  They do not believe because they are not of His sheep!

This is the main reason that our God told His covenant people to kill every man, woman, and child of the Canaanites that were living in the Promised Land.  It was to be a complete genocide. They were not to send missionaries first and see if any of them repented.  The answer is that none of them could believe.  For they were not His sheep.  They were a mixed breed, i.e. He didn’t plant them.

Arminians and Calvinists both struggle to understand how God would say such a thing as asking His people to genocide a group of nations.  So do Christian-Identity preachers who teach Adam was the father of Cain.  The problem is that they must describe how two seed lines with the same father and the same mother are 100% different. What happened to “kind after kind”?! But it only makes complete sense to the teachers of covenant theology who say that the devil was the father of one seed, while Adam was the father of the other. 

The only way that one group of people could never believe anything that our Savior taught was that they had to have a different racial father.  Adam couldn’t be their father, as they would have the ability to understand the words of our God.  The anointed angel, who was cast out of heaven, seduced Eve and produced these strange, anti-God and anti-Christian generations.  They have been the eternal enemy of our God and His children.  They are attempting to rule the world, with at least 200 slaves beckoning to their call.  They were not planted by God. 


On the website, www.bereanbiblechurch.org “Is Cain the Serpent Seed? the following is said:

1 John 3:12: “Not as Cain, who was of that wicked one, and slew his brother.  And wherefore slew he him?  Because his own works were evil, and his brother’s righteous.”

Was Adam the wicked one?  If Adam was the father of Cain, then Adam would be the “wicked one.”   Was the devil the wicked one?  If the devil was the father of Cain, then the devil would be the “wicked one”

Let’s look how this one website answers this verse, which is how many “Christians” today would view it:

“All who believe in Christ are brothers and sisters in Christ.  It a sad thing when people use the Bible to support their sin of prejudice.  This serpent seed doctrine is a sick twisted teaching that distorts the Word of God.  The devil’s children are not a physical people [for] they are those who do not believe in Christ, no matter what race they are.Galatians 3:28; Ephesians 2:13-16; Revelation 7:9-10.”

What this Berean Bible Church and other one-seed liners argue is that the devil’s children are not racial or physical.  They are anyone of any race who do not believe in Christ.  From "Eve, Did She or Didn't She?":

“Whereas the seedliners demand that the beguiling of Eve was physical in nature, scripture (2 Corinthians 11:3) declares that the beguiling of Eve was mental in nature. 

Whereas the seedliners demand that Cain was the offspring of Eve and Satan, scripture (Genesis 4:1) declares that Cain was the offspring of Eve and Adam.

Whereas the seedliners demand that Cain, as the mongrelized son of Satan, could never be accepted by Yahweh, scripture (Genesis 4:7) declares that Cain, as Adam’s son, would have been approved by Yahweh if he would have done right, that is, behaved righteously.” (Conclusion, “Eve, Did She or Didn’t She”).

And to prove their argument, they give seven verses of Scripture to justify their position without any explanation. But we will show, after a short examination of these references, that these verses prove nothing of what the Berean Church says they do.

Galatians 3:28 “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond of free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus.”

This verse does not say anything about who the serpent seed is.  It refers to the other seed, the good seed.  “There is neither Jew nor Greek”or more accurately, there is neither Judean nor Greek speaking.  Which is saying there is not Jew and non-Jew, but there are Judeans, those of the House of Judah, and Greek speaking, those of the House of Israel.  They are all one seed in Christ Jesus. 

As the late Arnold Kennedy said in his book, The Exclusiveness of Israel, page 84, “The New Testament re-unites the Judean Israelites [“Jews”] and the Dispersion [“Gentiles”] into One Body by Calvary.”

How does this show that “the devil’s children are not a physical people”?

Ephesians 2:13-16:

13) “But now in Christ Jesus ye who sometimes were far off are made nigh by the blood of Christ.

14) For He is our peace, who hath made both one, and hath broken down the middle wall of partition between us.

15) Having abolished in His flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances; for to make in Himself of twain one new man, so making peace;

16) And that He might reconcile both unto God in one body by the cross, having slain the enmity thereby:”

The author of the website just gave these verses with no explanation, so I don’t know what he meant by them. This small portion of the book of Ephesians is not referring to the devil’s children but to the formerly divorced House of Israel and the House of Judah being reconciled into one group by the death of Jesus Christ.  Verses 11 and 12 show the situation that the House of Israel had been in for over seven centuries.  Verse 13 tells how they were made near by the blood of the everlasting covenant shed by our Savior.

Arnold Kennedy, said on the same page of his book, referenced above: “In Ephesians 2:11-22 is no different.  The Dispersion had become [were] as strangers but through the same Spirit, with which they were anointed they were able to be reconciled unto God in one body by the “the cross”, or stake.  In one body there is no difference between the Israelite Judeans and the Dispersion.” 

But these four verses don’t show any reason why the devil’s children are not a physical people.

Revelation 7:9-10:

9) “And this I beheld, and, lo, a great multitude, which no man could number, of all nations, and kindreds, and people, and tongues, stood before the throne, and before the Lamb, clothed with white robes, and palms in their hands;


These two verses follow verses 4-8 which mentions all the tribes of Israel, except for the tribe of Dan being sealed.  But this has already happened.  There is no tribe of Dan mentioned here, which gives us a historical clue as to what time we are in. 

The destruction of Rome was momentarily suspended while the tribes of Israel were sealed.  The tribe of Dan is not mentioned, because the main body of that tribe as Israel existed in the world at this time, is not within the bounds of the Roman Empire nor among those invading the Empire, but rather, they are already quite safe in northern Europe. 

The phrase “all nations” could only mean all the nations of the Adamic world or that part of the world which Rome ruled over and which had undergone this tribulation.  The great crowd, which no one was able to number, is a glimpse into the fulfillment of the promise to Abraham, for all these people are descendants of the ancient Israelites.

I don't see how these two verses say anything about the children of Satan having no physical seed!


Matthew 15:13 But He [Jesus] answered and said, Every plant, which My [Jesus’] heavenly Father hath not planted, shall be rooted up.”

What does this verse of Scripture mean?  It explains that God did not plant every plant, i.e., there are many mixed breed people that are not His creation. They are the product of adulteration and miscegenation. The devil fathered Cain.

Matthew 13:36-40:

36) “Then Jesus sent the multitude away and went into the house. And His disciples came to Him, saying, “Explain to us the parable of the tares of the field.”

37)  He answered and said to them: “He who sows the good seed is the Son of Man. 

38) The field is the world, the good seeds are the sons of the kingdom, but the tares are the sons of the wicked one. 

39) The enemy who sowed them is the devil, the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are the angels. 

40) Therefore as the tares are gathered and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of this age.

We can see the two contrasting seedlines in this parable who were fathered by two different individuals. The good seeds by the Son of Man and the tares by the devil, the wicked one.There were two different races of men in Judea; one who was planted by God and one who was planted by the enemy of God, the devil.   And they both have a distinct destiny:  one to eternal life and the other to being burnt in the fire. The devil fathered Cain.

Matthew 23:33 “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers [scribes, Pharisees and hypocrites], how can ye [scribes, Pharisees and hypocrites] escape the damnation of hell?”

Who was Jesus referring to in this verse?  Was he calling the descendants of Adam-Cain (the scribes, Pharisees, and hypocrites) as being identified as“serpents” and “vipers”, who are going to spend eternity in hell, or was He calling the descendants of the devil-Cain as being “serpents” and a “generation of vipers”? If Adam was the father of both children, Cain, and Abel, why would it only be the descendants of Cain who were called these notoriously bad names? The devil fathered Cain.

John 8:44a: Ye [Jews] are of your [Jews] father the devil, and the lusts of your [Jews] father ye [Jews] will do….”

The Bible tells us that Jesus said this to the Jews (verse 31).  Did He refer to the Jews that their original father was the devil, or was He telling His enemies that Adam fathered Cain? Was He saying that the father of the Jews was the devil, meaning Adam?  This doesn’t make any sense! Remember, the Jews had a different father (John 8:38).  The devil fathered Cain.

John 10:26 “But ye [Jews, verse 24] believe not, because ye [Jews] are not of My sheep, as I said unto you [Jews].

Did Jesus say that the Jews were not His sheep and were they unable to ever believe? How could that be if Adam was their ancient father?  Again, if Adam fathered both children, how could one family line be 100% evil and the other one able to repent? The devil fathered Cain.

1 John 3:12 “Not as Cain, who was of the wicked one....”

Who did the apostle of Jesus say was of the “wicked one”?  Was the father of Cain the “wicked”serpent or was he the “wicked”Adam? Why doesn’t it say that Abel, or Seth, were of the “wicked one”? The devil fathered Cain.

2 Corinthians 11:3 “But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtility, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.”

Did the apostle Paul say that the “serpent beguiled Eve”or was it Adam who beguiled Eve? Sheldon Emry and his followers teach that the serpent beguiled Eve mentally, not sexually.  But who is the devil’s seed (Genesis 3:15)? The devil fathered Cain.

Matthew 3:7 “But when he [John the Baptist] saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees [Edomite Jews] come to his baptism, he [John the Baptist] said unto them [Edomite Jews], O generation of vipers, who hath warned you [Edomite Jews] to flee from the wrath to come?”

The Pharisees and Sadducees were Edomite Jews.  John the Baptist called them a “generation of vipers”. Edomites (descendants of Esau) married the Canaanites who married the Kenites (descendants of Cain).  John the Baptist called them a generation of vipers.  Who was he calling the original “viper”? It wasn’t Adam. The devil fathered Cain.

Matthew 13:38, 39:

38) “The field is the world; the good seed are the children of the kingdom; but the tares are the children of the wicked one;

39) The enemy that sowed them is the devil;….”

Who are the tares whose father was the “wicked one”, the devil?  The children of the kingdom and the tares had different fathers; one good and the other “wicked.” Who was the father of the tares?  It wasn’t Adam. The devil fathered Cain.

Matthew 23:35: “That upon you [serpents, generation of vipers, v. 33] may come all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel unto the blood of Zacharias son of Barachias, whom ye [serpents, generation of vipers] slew between the temple and the altar.”

Here, Jesus is charging the “serpents, the generation of vipers” with the murder of Abel.  It would have been criminally illegal on the part of Jesus to make such a charge if it were not true.  The only way He could legally have produced such a serious charge was if the “Jews” of His day were descended from Cain, for no other person in all of history was responsible for the murder of Abel. 

But there are ministers who believe that Adam fathered Cain and who twist the accusers of murder from the Jews to the true Israelites!  Look at the booklet, “Eve, Did She or Didn’t She?”(page 68), where it makes the following statement:

“Seedliners claim that since the Pharisees and their progenitors were charged with the murders of all the righteous from Abel to Zacharias, they cannot be Israelites, and must instead be Cainites and thus the seed of Satan. However, the truth is that since those Pharisees and their forefathers were indicated as being responsible for the murder of those righteous martyrs they cannot be Cainites and must instead be Israelites.

But if this were true, Jesus would be condemning the entire race of true Israelites, including Himself, His family, His Apostles, and His disciples, etc.  This was said about the serpents, the generation or race of vipers.  The same individuals who Jesus said were not His sheep.  There is nothing more blasphemous than to imply the Jesus the Christ was a racial brother to the “Jews”!  The devil fathered Cain.

And if you thought that this was bad, look what is said on another audio CD, You Might Be a Christian if... Pt. 9, made by a universalist pseudo-Christian-Identity preacher which contains many poisonous and false allegations, especially if you believe that Jesus Himself, is a racist:

“... And don’t you dare, and I don’t think anyone would here – I’m sure you wouldn’t, but somebody who might hear this on tape – don’t you dare interpret what I just said as racist and supremacist, because I assure you that one can be a separatist without being a racist ....

How do I know that? Because I’m a separatist, and I denounce racists and supremacists. And if you don’t want to believe me on that, then you might want to possibly take the word of hundreds – and who knows how many more – maybe more than that, you might want to take the word of hundreds of black Nigerians and others to whom this ministry has sent hundreds, if not thousands of dollars of free Bibles and tapes since its very inception.”

Is this a true Christian-Identity preacher?  How can he say that he denounces racists when His supposed God is racist? When Abraham placed his childless son, Isaac on the altar, Isaac and all his descendants became the personal property of our LORD God. And if they disobeyed His Commandments, He could punish them as He saw fit. That leaves out all the other races!


Maybe we should change what we call ourselves.  Christian-Identity may no longer be correct.  For many, if not the majority, of Christian-Identity preachers are universalists.  Maybe one name that would be more fitting for us to use would be the Exclusiveness of Christian-Israel.  For that is the difference between us and them. 

Are the promises given in the Abrahamic Covenant to the descendants of Jacob/Israel’s seed ONLY, or is it made available to all the different races of the world? Martin Luther, one of the leaders of the Protestant Reformation, after he read the Talmud, the “holy book” of the Jews, completely changed his opinion on “these children of the devil.”  He stated that they should be banished out of all the lands of the Israel nations along with their usury banking systems, for they were nothing more than liars.   


If you believe that Adam was the father of Cain, then you are saying that Adam was “the wicked one”, the “devil”, the “viper”, the “serpent” in the Garden, the “dragon”,the “adversary” (Satan), the “goat”, that he “beguiled” Eve and that he was the father of a generation of murderers.   For that is who the Bible says fathered Cain.  Why are these same words not used to describe who fathered Abel or Seth?

And if that were true, that Adam was the father of Cain, then the descendants of Cain would be no different than the descendants of Seth.  So, why would it be that one seed can never and has never been godly and the other seed are the ones known as Christendom and both seed lines had the same parents? Why would one seed say that our Savior is now in hell boiling in a cauldron for the rest of eternity, while the other seed believes that He now is seated on the right hand of the God the Father.

To understand the Two-Seedline doctrine is to understand the great world conspiracy and the campaign by the enemy for creating miscegenation. This war is truly more than the battle of the mental. It is the war between the two opposing physical seed lines to the death of one.

There are many more verses that could be cited, but if you still believe that Adam fathered Cain after what has been written, what difference will it make?  You will probably never change your mind.  But you must answer these fundamental questions:

  • Why do the Kenites, Canaanites and Jews, if their ancient father was Adam, have no chance of salvation, but are guaranteed a place in hell?  Remember the law of “kind after kind”.
  • Why did Esau’s offspring with Hittite wives have no chance of salvation?  Didn’t Esau do this when he despised the covenant?
  • Why did any one of pure Israelite blood who married a different racial foreigner produce offspring who were not Israelites?
  • Why do the Jews have an intense, never wavering hatred in their heart and mind against Jesus the Christ and His followers?
  • Why do the Jews spit every time they hear the name “Jesus” or “Jesus Christ” uttered?
  • Why are their “holy books”, the Talmud and Kabbalah, so filled with hate and are the opposite of God’s Holy Laws?  One needs to read portions of these books before he/she decides on this conclusion?
  • Why do the Jews, as our former co-pastor Mark pointed out, say in their “holy books” that they, the mongrel Jews are the highest life form on earth, while the racially pure White Christians are considered inferior animals and slaves at best?
  • What was the “enmity” that was placed in the serpent and the woman and between their two seeds by Almighty God?
  • Who were the fathers of the giants that roamed the earth for over a thousand years?

The Jews in the last centuries have initiated all the major wars, have introduced all sorts of filth and pornography into the media and entertainment, led the march to feminism and reproductive and civil rights. Jews have been the principal actors and agitators behind Communism, Internationalism, Globalism, Open Borders, and every other method of attack against White Christian society.  To accomplish this, the Jew secularized society by abusing Christian laws and documents and exploiting once-Christian courts to remove God, and Christ from the public notice from the schools and from all branches of government. 

Why is it, out of all the billions of people who are living in the world, it is always the Jews who are behind all this evil that is destroying White Christian civilization?  It can only be because their father is different than our father.  Their father is the “devil”, the “serpent”, the “wicked one”, i.e., the fallen angel.  They are our eternal enemy. 

If Adam was the father of Cain and Adam was the father of Abel and Seth, then what was the difference between the two seed lines?  They should be the same, but they are not.  How could only one, Cain, be a mongrel, while the others, Abel and later Seth were pure-blooded?  Why are they so drastically opposed to one another?

Why is one seed line unable to escape the “damnation of hell”while the other will have eternal life?  Why did Jesus say that one seed line was of the devil, while the other was His sheep?  No other seed line, be it negro, Oriental, or Caucasian are said to be the offspring of the devil; just the Sephardic, Hasidic, Orthodox, Reformed, Reconstructionist, Mizrahi, or Ashkenazi, or other types of Jews.  The devil, the leader of the fallen angels, was their father.

From Kevin Mac Donald’s article, entitled, “Why are Jews So Influential”, from https://www.unz.com/article/why-are-jews-so-influential/?utm_source=emai...

“The current situation in the United States is the result of an awesome deployment of Jewish power and influence. One must contemplate the fact that American Jews have managed to maintain unquestioned support for Israel since the 1967 war despite Israel’s seizing land and engaging in a brutal occupation of the Palestinians in the occupied territories—an apartheid occupation that will most likely end with expulsion or complete subjugation and degradation of the Palestinians. During this same period Jewish organizations in America have been a principal…and main force for erecting a state dedicated to suppressing ethnic identification among Europeans, for encouraging massive multi-ethnic immigration into the United States, and for erecting a legal system and cultural ideology that is obsessively sensitive to the complaints and interests of ethnic minorities: the culture of the Holocaust. All this is done without a whisper of double standards in the aboveground media.” 

The devil was the father of Cain.  Adam was not the father of Cain.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.