The Art of Dealing with Loaded Words

by Walter Giddings

September 25, 2022

Scripture Reading Job 10:16

Are the words “sex”, “sexual”, and “sexuality” loaded words that are best avoided in polite company?!  That is a yes/no question!  What is your answer? 

How many of you here, or within the sound of my voice, or in sight of the text of this message or lesson, are ready, right now, to avoid these loaded words?

There is so much occurring in American social intercourse that constitutes perverse “in your face” provocation, it resembles assault by legion!  Did I say “intercourse”?  Is this assault by legion inescapable?

Greetings Kindred and Fellow Sheep.  We are on a 1st name basis here.  My name is Walter.  I am not your teacher.  Our Master is Jesus Christ.  I, like you, am your classmate in God’s classroom.  My role in this pulpit is pedagogue, the term meaning the one who is supposed to lead you to the Real Teacher.

Shall we attempt an example of what we want to escape by using a less charged, more unloaded term?  What is a “term”?  Could this get complicated?  How complicated is unloading loaded words? 

TERM, n.  [L. terminus, a limit or boundary.] 7. In grammar, a word or expression; that which fixes or determines ideas.  1828 Webster. 

Can we see there might be a way out of this confusion? 

Job in earnest Prayer asked God, “shew me wherefore thou contendest with me.”  [10:2]. 

Job 10:15  If I be wicked, woe unto me; and if I be righteous, yet will I not lift up my head.  I am full of confusion; therefore see thou mine affliction. 

“See thou mine affliction.”  Are we full of confusion in a confusing age? 

Shall we pray?  Shall we pray the prayer of the 71st Psalm, verse 1? 

Psalm 71:1    In thee, O LORD, do I put my trust: never let me be put to confusion. 

Does confusion have an author? 

1 Corinthians 14:33  For God is not the author of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. 

Who do we find is the author of confusion

What is the foremost question we should ask about loaded words? 

2 Corinthians 2:11 Lest Satan should get an advantage of us:  for we are not ignorant of his devices. 

How hard is it for the Adversary to employ his devices?  Does Satan lack volunteers?  Do his volunteers fall into his lap?  Are they taken captive by him at his will?  Is every volunteer for Jesus hard fought, hard won, blood bought? 

Does every volunteer for Jesus have the comfort of the Father of Israel’s promise? 

Philippians 4:7 And the peace of God, which passeth all understanding, shall keep your hearts and minds through Christ Jesus. 

The word “keep”, is translated from the Koine Greek word, G5432 froureo, froo-reh’-o, which has the seminal signification “to mount a guard”.  Does this mean “the peace of God” mounts a guard in our hearts and minds?  Shall we use the promise of Israel’s God What is the foremost question we should ask concerning loaded words?  Are we “ignorant of his devices”? 

Who loaded these words?  Is the work of the author of confusion everywhere evident? 

Shall we attempt an example of what we want to escape by using a word less loaded?  Take, for example, the use of the word “overturn”.  Whenever people with a sense of responsibility encounter trespasses of state election laws, and breaches of the state constitution, they are routinely and universally accused of attempting to overturn “the election”.  Berserker accusations are commonplace in 2020’s social intercourse.  Does the 1st to accuse win?!  Is it possible to unload the word “overturn”?  Have we thought to ask, who can overturn an already over-turned election?  Does Lucifer accuse the brethren of crimes he is committing? 

The 1st thing we notice about the words sex, sexual, sexuality is none of them appear in the Scriptures.  These English words are not in the Bible.  They do appear in the 1828 Webster’s First American Dictionary of the English Language

SEX, n.  [L. sexus; from L. seco, to divide.] 

1. The distinction between male and female; or the property or character by which an animal is male or female.  The male sex is usually characterized by muscular strength, boldness and firmness.  The female sex is characterized by softness, sensibility and modesty.  ...

2.  By way of emphasis, womankind; females. 

Unhappy sex!  whose beauty is your snare.  Dryden

The sex whose presence civilizes ours.  Milne. 

SEXUAL,  a.  [from sex.] 

1.  Pertaining to sex or the sexes; distinguishing the sex; denoting what is particular to the distinction and office of male and female;  as sexual characteristics;  ...

SEXUALITY, n.  The state of being distinguished by sex.  1828 Webster. 

Do the 1828 definitions mean we have been “having sex” since the day we were born? Has Noah Webster shown us three English words that have been loaded in our time?  Did these words have any such disability in Webster’s time? 

Does it seem the Devil’s volunteers, both single-fold and two-fold sons of hell, work overtime as change agents into the English language?  And why not?  Consider the source!  What else should we expect from wretched, miserable rebels against the Good Shepherd, against the God and Author of Peace? 

How did the change agent sons of hell get these 3 words loaded for our time, the last days?  Return above to the adjective SEXUAL.  Notice the 3 periods in punctuation indicating there is more left off.  I did that to parse this subject with questions. Shall we add back what was left off? 

SEXUAL,  a.  [from sex.]  ... sexual intercourse, connection or commerce. 

“Sexual intercourse”; “Sexual connection”; “Sexual commerce”.  The American English of 1828 added the words intercourse, connection, and commerce.  The American English of 1828 is age appropriate.  Has the American English of the 21st Century limited the word “sexual” exclusively to intercourse, connection, and commerce?  (Proverbs 22:6).  Does the “public fool system” of our day wish to appropriate the duty of parents to “train up a child in the way he should go”?  Do the sex educators of the U.S. Department of Education have aggressive sex education lesson plans fully developed for little children with organs not fully developed?  The “special teachers” that “teach” from these aggressive sex education lesson plans are they already “teaching”?  Are those trained to teach these abominations chomping at the bit and stomping their hooves, awaiting the day parents are handcuffed at home and the “immune” children can be abused at school?  Are they already accusing the parents of being the terrorists?  Is accusing your enemies of the crimes you have been systematically committing all along, a classic favorite in the satanic bag of tricks?  Purple for Parents has copies of the lesson plans and the evidence they are already being “taught”! 

Proverbs 6:22 Train up a child in the way he should go:  and when he is old, he will not depart from it. 

“And when he is old, he will not depart from it.”  Will an old public fool graduate not depart from pedophilia?  Airplane barf bag, anybody?  Do they mock our God? 

Classmates, you are my classmates in God’s classroom. What unloaded word or words could we substitute instead of, or in place of, “sex, sexual,” and “sexuality”?  Any ideas?  In 1828 Webster what did Noah Webster’s study of word origins show us how we should define “sex, sexual, sexuality”?  When we think of the terms, male and female, what English word refers to both? 

GEN’DER,  n.  [L. genus, from geno, gigno; Gr. to beget, or to be born; 

Eng. kind.  ..  We have begun from the same root.  ..  ]

1.  Properly, kind; sort. 

2.  A sex, male or female.  Hence,

3.  In grammar, a difference in words to express distinction of sex; usually a difference in terminations of nouns, adjectives and participles, to express the distinction of male and female.  But although this was the original design of different terminations, yet in the progress of language, other words having no relation to one sex or the other came to have genders assigned to them by custom.  Words expressing males are said to be of the masculine gender;  those expressing females, of the feminine gender;  and in some languages, words expressing things having no sex, are of the neuter or neither gender. 

GEN’DER,  v.t.  to beget;  but engender is more generally used.  

GEN’DER,  v.i.  To copulate; to breed.     Levit. 19. 

1828 Webster. 

Verse 19 of Leviticus chapter 19 states in pertinent part, “thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind:” If we let our cattle gender with a diverse kind, what Law of Creation Order do we transgress? 

Is that any better?  Have we succeeded in unloading the loaded words sex, sexual, sexuality? 

Uh Oh!  Transgender!  Are they attacking us at every point on the compass? 

“Transgender” does not appear in 1828 Webster.  “TRANSGRESSION” is there.  “Transgender" is not!  This word transgender is a later invention in American English.  Does the devil “knoweth that he hath but a short time”? (Revelation 12). 

One of the most glaring, but unnoticed changes these wretched, miserable change agents have invented, is the word homosexual.  This word, homosexual, is a later invention in American English. 

Why invent the word homosexual?  Is this a satanic device used to control social discourse?  Is this a clever device to give adherents and proponents the edge on the debate platform?  Does this device include a railing accusation:  homophobic ?  Is this aggressive, accusatorial, prosecutorial, civilization-cancelling platform designed to secure to abusers additional civil rights unavailable to Americans made victims of practices that war on public hygiene, sanitation and health?  Will the abusers have all civil rights while the “hateful bigots,” accused of being Christians are robbed of their living and liberty and trodden down in the mire?  Will even that fail to satisfy the abusers?  Are abusers genocidal maniacs?    

Should sheep remain stupid?  Should the sheep stand between the rails of the express train railroad tracks with palm of hand extended forward in the classic stop sign?  Or should we loosen a few bolts, and move one of the rails outward slightly?  How do we sheep get back the edge on the debate platform?  What do we do to move a section of railroad track outward slightly?  For God’s sake, I do not want any fair minded man or woman telling We the People that I advocate derailing trains!  Let the abusers, the wretched miserable rebels against God expose themselves, while We the People consider the source!  Derailing a train is a word picture, a metaphor, to help us strategize with wisdom! 

Who is the author of wisdom?  Shall we make use of God’s wisdom to strategize a way to level the debate platform against the common use of the loaded words, sex, sexual, sexuality, transgender and homosexual?  Thinking caps, anybody?  How do we derail the abusers express freight train of loaded words in every boxcar coming full speed down the tracks to unlevel, and slant every debate platform?  How do we sheep know God’s will, to walk in God’s way, to do God’s work, and derail this metaphorical express freight train of loaded words?  How do we do this the Jesus way and not the heathen way? 

My friends at Mission to America have this beautiful poster portraying hills of gently sloped pasture near still waters with sheep feeding, resting, and enjoying where the Good Shepherd has led them.  Printed on this peaceful background are God’s will, God’s way, God’s work, a concise definition for each, and a Scripture illustrating each step. 

God’s Will, on this pastoral poster, is defined as “Exactly what I would choose if I knew all the facts.”  Selah. 

Psalm 143:10 Teach me to do thy will; for thou art my God:  thy spirit is good; lead me into the land of uprightness. 

“Teach me to do thy will; for thou art my God.”  What is God’s will in dealing with change agents loading words to slant every debate platform?  What would Jesus do?  Better yet, What did Jesus do?!  Does the most ancient literature in Adam, the Library of God, contain a built-in dictionary?  Does any student of the Bible know the 3-letter word defined as “the transgression of the law”?  Sin

I have encountered a couple of brothers in the Common Faith who are in the habit of saying “Words have meaning.” 

If God took care to define His terms, should we do what God did?  If we do what God did, would we have blessed assurance we are doing God’s will?  Should we take care to define the terms in our speech the way God defined them?  Should we, as the children of God, do what our Heavenly Father did?  Is God’s will “exactly what we would choose if we knew all the facts? 

Did we know all the facts?  Does our lack of success on the debate platform indicate No?  Should sheep remain stupid?  Are the tactics of God’s enemies moving goalposts definitions for words like racist, racism, homosexual, homophobic?  How in the face of that, do we perform God’s will according to God’s way?  How well do we understand God’s way?

God’s Way, on the pastoral poster is defined as “exactly the opposite of my natural inclinations”! 

Proverbs 14:12  There is a way which seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are the ways of death. 

 Have we sheep found the source of our stupidity?  Is our own carnal nature our very worst enemy? 

How urgently does God want to impress upon us the wicked nature of our desperate condition?  If we die in our own carnal nature without the birth from above are we utterly sold out unto the second death, a death infinitely more terrifying that the first death, the common death of Adam? 

Proverbs 16:25 There is a way that seemeth right unto a man, but the end thereof are  the ways of death. 

Does God have to repeat Himself?  Yes/No?  Then why does He choose to?  If God chooses to repeat what He has already said, should that get our attention?  Is God’s way exactly the opposite of our natural inclinations? 

Have we been losing the debate on the slanted debate platform? Are we sick and tired of losing in our losing? 

Romans 6:21 What fruit had ye then in those things whereof ye are now ashamed? for the end of those things is death. 

How well do we understand God’s way?  Does our losing the debate on the slanted debate platform tell us we do not have a complete understanding of God’s way?  Did the Sadducees intend to slant the debate platform on the question of the Resurrection?  Did they frame a trick question to trap Jesus?   

Matthew 22:23-33

23 The same day came to him the Sadducees, which say there is no resurrection, and asked him,

24 Saying, Master, Moses said, If a man die, having no children, his brother shall marry his wife, and raise up seed unto his brother.   

25 Now there were with us seven brethren:  and the first, when he  had married a wife, deceased, and having no issue, left his wife unto his brother: 

26 Likewise the second also, and the third, unto the seventh. 

27 And last of all the woman died also. 

28 Therefore in the resurrection whose wife shall she be of the seven?  for they all had her. 

29 Jesus answered and said unto them, Ye do err, not knowing the scriptures, nor the power of God. 

30 For in the resurrection they neither marry, nor are given in marriage, but are as the angels of God  in heaven. 

31 But as touching the resurrection of the dead, have ye not read that which was spoken unto you by God, saying,

32 I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob?  God is not the God of the dead, but of the living. 

33 And when the multitude heard this, they were astonished at his doctrine. 

Did the Sadducees understand they were confronting the holy Author of the Scriptures?  The multitude “were astonished at His doctrine.”  Six times in the Gospels we find the phrase “astonished at his doctrine, the doctrine of the Lord”.  What astonished the multitude here?  Did Jesus preach something the priesthood did not?  Did Jesus say, “God is not the God of the dead, but of the living”?  Do we want to be among “the dead”, or among “the living”?  Who are “the dead” of whom “God is not the God of”?  Does being alive unto Christ mean we are dead to this world?  Where did God speak unto the Sadducees, saying, “I am the God of Abraham, and the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob”? 

Exodus 3:6 Moreover he said, I am the God of thy father, the God of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob.  And Moses hid his face; for he was afraid to look upon God. 

Had Moses led the flock of his father-in-law Jethro to the backside of the desert nigh unto the mountain of God, even Horeb, opposite Sinai in Arabia as Galatians tells us?  Is this Moses standing without shoes on holy ground at the Burning Bush?  Shall we go to the last two verses of John 5? 

John 5:46-47

46 For had ye believed Moses, ye  would have believed me:  for he wrote of me. 

47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words? 

Did the Sadducees believe Jesus?  Have you heard the old saying, “That’s why they’re Sad, you see? 

Have we seen the Sadducees brought a trick question to Jesus?  What did Jesus tell them?  Look back to Matthew 22:29:  what did Jesus tell them?  “Ye do err, not knowing the Scriptures, nor the power of God.”   

If we, as the followers of Christ, know the Scriptures and the power of God, are we able, as Christ was, to solve a trick question posed to us in our time?  What trick question is presented to us in our time by those who are “sad, you see”?  Upon what does this trick question revolve? 

Does the relatively new word homosexual contain a loaded word?  What is that loaded word?  “Sexual” is the loaded word in homosexual.  The agenda is homosexuals need extra civil rights, because of their history as an oppressed minority.  And Americans need no rights!  Failure to cooperate labels Americans as homophobes; a crime akin to terrorism!  The agenda dictates that Americans have been so mean and nasty toward homosexuals that these draconian measures are absolutely necessary and imperative to right the wrong!  Indeed the agenda dictates only the draconian measures can right the wrong of centuries! 

Should we use the wisdom of Christ and rely on the power of God?  What can we use as a load leveler against the slant in the public debate platform?  Ideas? 

What makes the question or issue of homosexual rights such a thorny one? 

Does the term Resurrection appear in the Bible?  Yes:  zero times from Genesis unto Malachi, and from Matthew unto Revelation, 41 times in 40 verses.  In these verses Jesus has, with the Apostles and Disciples, arrived, after Lazarus’ death, at his tomb. 

John 11:24-25

24 Martha saith unto him,  I know that he shall rise again in the resurrection at the last day. 

25 Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection and the life:  he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live. 

“Though he were dead.”  Were Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob dead when Moses spoke with the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob at the burning bush?  Did we just read that in Exodus 3:6?  Were those who were sad, you see, ignorant?  Does ignorant mean we do not know something?  They did not know God is not the God of the dead!  How bad is the bad news for the dead!  How good is the good news for those who are eligible to live again (!)?  After the 1st blood sacrifice, when Adam and his wife received the animal skins to replace the fig leaves, did Adam prophesy in naming his wife Eve?  What does the name Eve mean?  Does the name Eve mean “the mother of all living”, the mother of all those eligible to live again?  (Genesis 3)

Does the invention, homosexual, appear in the Bible?

The invention homosexual, does not even appear in 1828 Webster!  Does the invention homosexual fit the definition of TERM within its grammatical meaning in 1828 Webster?

TERM:  7.  In grammar, a word or expression; that which fixes or determines ideas.  1828 Webster. 

Does the invention homosexual, fix or determine an idea?  Or is it more like the invention racism/racist?  Are the inventions homosexual, and racism/racist anything and nothing, and nothing and anything?  Are they all portable goalposts?  According to 1828 Webster they are not “grammatical”!  If we define “grammar” as the laws of our native language, are those inventions lawless?!!  How fitting for wretched, miserable rebels who hate Jesus Christ and all his followers!  Why do we sheep take this dung in the face?Are we stupid?  Are we stupid?  We are sheep! 

Abortion rights were foisted on Americans in the wake of the most massive ignorance of basic biology in history.  Will homosexual rights be foisted on Americans in the wake of the most massive ignorance of basic biology in history? 

1828 Webster defines Abuse! 

ABUSE, n.  Ill use; improper treatment or employment; application to a wrong purpose; as an abuse of our natural powers; an abuse of civil rights, or of religious privileges;  abuse of advantages, &c.   Liberty may be endangered by the abuses of liberty, as well as by the abuses of power.  Federalist, Madison. 

2.   A corrupt practice or custom, as the abuses of government.        ...

4.   Seduction.  After the abuse he forsook me.  Sidney. 

5.   Perversion of meaning; Improper use or application; as an abuse of words. 

ABUSED,      pp.  s as z.  Ill used; used to a bad purpose;  ...  perverted to bad or wrong ends;  deceived;  defiled;  violated. 

ABUSER,  n.  s as z.  One who abuses,  ...  a ravisher;   a sodomite.     1 Cor.  vi. 

ABUSE,  v.t.  s as z.  [ ... L.  abutor,  abusus,  of  ab and utor,  to use ;  ...  See use.] 

1.   To use ill; to maltreat; to misuse; to use with bad motives or to wrong purposes; as to abuse

rights or privileges.  They that use this world as not abusing it.     1 Cor. vii. 

2.   To violate; to defile by improper sexual inter course.  Spenser.  1828 Webster. 

In our research of the term ABUSE did we see the lawless invention Homo-sexual?  Signification #5:  “Perversion of meaning; Improper use or application; as an abuse of words. 

Let us return to the pastoral poster.  God’s work.  Do we know how to do God’s work in God’s Vineyard?  The pastoral poster reads:  God’s Work.   Exactly what Jesus would do if He were in my situation. 

Matthew 6:10 Thy kingdom come.  Thy will be done in earth, as it is in heaven. 

In order to fix in the law extra civil rights for homosexuals would wisdom dictate we have to have a list and an accurate description of the acts, deeds, or doings they wish to have as specially protected activities?  Can we imagine sodomites testifying before Congress the lurid biological details of their crimes against nature in rank opposition to our laws of public hygiene and sanitation?  Are most of them so out of the closet, they’d be stupid enough to do it?!  On the other hand the monsters of evil, will scream “invasion of privacy”!  These are the same Bolsheviks that want to turn sodomites loose in our public marketplaces and public parks!  How grateful have we been; how thankful are we to the God of our salvation for all the exposure of the public fool system’s curricula?  Are we grateful God in His will has manifested public fools teach children being victims of pedophilia is natural?  Has the Bishop of our Souls already gone before us?!  Has the Good Shepherd already led in the way we should go?!  Shall we, in God’s work, insist on accurate descriptions of the acts, deeds, or doings they wish to have as specially protected activities?

Would anything less make the law unenforceable?  If the persecutor (sorry judge, I mean the prosecutor) does not intend to prove that I violated the rights of sodomites to engage in their specially protected activities, has he already admitted I have committed no offense?  Has he failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted?  I move the case be dismissed with prejudice!  Judge, did the prosecutor know, or should he have known that his filing charge(s) would be frivolous?I move he be assessed damages for my expenses out of his own pocket for acting outside his scope of authority!  Who has heard of the Void for Vagueness Doctrine?

 Would anything less than an accurate description of the acts, they wish to have as specially protected activities make that enactment “Void for Vagueness”?    Should we join The Great I Am, our God in His Work, exposing their wicked deeds?  Shall Christians shed light into a dark place?  Shall we stand for the last Scripture reading in honor of The Good Shepherd who has done, is doing, and will do all things according to His Will, His Way, and His Work?!!!    

Ephesians 5:11-17

11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them. 

12 For it is a shame even to speak of those things which are done of them in secret. 

13 But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light:   for whatsoever doth make manifest is light. 


15 See then that ye walk circumspectly, not as fools, but as wise,

16 Redeeming the time, because the days are evil. 

17 Wherefore be ye not unwise, but understanding what the will of the Lord is. 

In verse 13:.  “Whatsoever doth make manifest is light.”  Is that the old light and darkness trick?  Turn on the lights, and watch the cockroaches scurry?!! 

What do Homosexuals do?!! 


1828 Webster   TERM 

Job 10:15   “mine affliction”.

Psalms 71:1   “confusion”. 

1 Corinthians 14:33   “confusion”. 

Philippians 4:7   “the peace of God”. 

1828 Webster   SEX, SEXUAL, SEXUALITY. 

Proverbs 22:6   “Train up”. 

1828 Webster   GENDER. 

(Leviticus 19:19).  “gender with a diverse kind”. 

Psalms 143:10 “to do thy will”. 

Proverbs 14:12 “way that seemeth right”.

Proverbs 16:25   “the end thereof”. 

Romans 6:21   “the end”. 

Matthew 22:23-33? of the resurrection. 

Exodus 3:6 “the God of” whom?

John 5:46-47   “believed Moses”. 

John 11:24-25   “though he were dead”. 

1828 Webster   “in grammar”. 

1828 Webster   ABUSE. 

Matthew 6:10.  “thy will be done”.

Ephesians 5:11-16 “For it is a shame ...”I