The Unholy Seed - Part 36



Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

May 10, 2020

Scripture Reading:  Matthew 4:15“The land of Zabulon, and the land of Nephthalim by the way of the sea, beyond Jordan, Galilee of the Gentiles:”


Dr. Fauci is involved in a treasonous act. He willingly violated United States’ law and was working hand in hand with the Communist nation of China. It is like the state of California ordering $1 billion worth of masks from a Chinese auto company that had just lost over $40 million dollars in the last quarter. The company has never made masks at any time; it made cars. And who owns stock in that company? —Warren Buffet.

While being at the head of the National Institute of Health, Dr. Fauci broke United States’ law, which forbade any more testing on the coronavirus. To get around this hindrance, he approved $3.7 million to be shipped to a lab which had many problems in Wuhan, China for the continuation of the study. The money was sent in 2014 while Fauci was in the Obama administration.

Fauci did what? Fauci gave a $3.7 grant to a Wuhan laboratory. The grant was made despite the fact the United States Department warned that the Wuhan laboratory was conducting dangerous experiments. That lab is suspected of leaking the virus that has spread itself all around the world. If the above is true, then American taxpayers have foot the bill for the thing that is killing us and many of our businesses.

The United States Intelligence Community has growing confidence that the current coronavirus strain may have accidentally escaped from the Wuhan lab rather than from a wildlife market, as many, including the W.H.O., across the world claim. But, why did the United States give money to the Chinese lab that it had prohibited? And now, Dr. Fauci is leading the United States in how to handle this disease!

Wasn’t Dr. Fauci the one who said in an interview over three ½ years ago that “…there would be a surprise outbreak…” in President Trump’s administration? Wasn’t he the one who said:

  • That the fraudulent model he was following was saying that there could be as many as 2.2 million Americans die from the pandemic?

  • That there wouldn’t be any professional, collegiate, or high school sports this year?

  • That there is a good possibility that the disease could spike again in the fall and maybe once again after the fall outbreak?

  • That he has been on the payroll of the Clinton Foundation for years?

I wonder how he can face the nation each day knowing that it was he who gave our enemy the grant to continue studying the coronavirus? The virus was probably made in Wuhan, with backing from our own labs in North Carolina and several other places.

Dr. Fauci’s father was a graduate of Columbia University (are you surprised?) and was a pharmacist. Fauci is a Roman Catholic and could be a crypto-Jew. He is a Jesuit. Should Dr. Fauci be found guilty of engaging in research intended to build biological weapons that target human beings. And if he is found guilty, should Dr. Fauci be criminally investigated and prosecuted for carrying out crimes against humanity? And if found guilty, should he face the death penalty?

Dr. Fauci is linked to Bill and Melinda Gates, the W.H.O. and the C.D.C., the United States laboratories and Harvard University. Did the media tell you that the hospitals get $13,000 for every patient that has coronavirus that enter the establishment and another $39,000 if they are put on a ventilator, which is the wrong treatment? The president has said that we are fighting an invisible enemy. The enemy that he is referring to is the coronavirus. But there is an enemy that is also invisible. Who is it?

But does our media pick up this story?


Daughters of Hunter Biden (on the left) and Barack Hussein Obama (on the right) are best friends. Here is a picture of them vacationing in Miami, Florida.When Obama was president, Joe Biden was his vice-president. They had many experiences together. But there is one that developed over time that the media doesn’t tell its readers/watchers/listeners about.

One of Joe Biden’s sons, Hunter, (you've heard of his troubles haven’t you?) has a daughter. Barack’s youngest daughter, Natasha or Sasha, and Hunter’s daughter go to the same school and have become the best of friends. They play on the same teams and even go on vacation together. They are best friends. But does our media pick up the story?

McKinsey & Company

In a past sermon, I told you about this company. It was in reference to Pete Buttigieg, the sodomite-married mayor of South Bend, Indiana. He worked for this company for about three years and was very secretive about what he did for them.

If was founded by James O. McKinsey, graduate of the University of Chicago and Columbia University (another surprise). From these two universities, you could guess his political views.

Peter Walker, former senior partner of McKinsey & Company says that China moved quickly on the coronavirus. The company that he worked for was a consultant to many companies, and they told them to improve their immediate profits by moving their companies to China and other low-cost countries. Here are a few of the famous people who have worked for this company:

  • Tom Cotton; United States Senator from Arkansas

  • Susan E. Rice; American diplomat; former U.S. National Security Council Advisor and former U. S. Ambassador to the United Nations

  • Chelsea Clinton; Vice Chairman, Clinton foundation, daughter of former United States President Bill Clinton and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton

  • Pete Buttigieg; Mayor of South Bend, Indiana and 2020 Presidential Candidate

  • Amelia Warren Tyagi; daughter of Elizabeth Warren (I talked about her in another sermon)

  • Taggart Mitt Romney; American management consultant, businessman, venture capitalist and political advisor. Eldest son of U.S. Senator Mitt Romney.

Does our media tell us about this company and who works or worked for them?


Media portrays this battle inaccurately, ignoring that Blacks picked up their weapons after surrendering and started shooting again.The Battle of Fort Pillow occurred as part of Confederate General Nathan Bedford Forrest’s spring 1864 raid into west Tennessee and Kentucky, areas held by Union troops. Fort Pillow is located at a bend in the Mississippi River roughly 40 miles north of Memphis, Tennessee. Built in 1861, the fort was originally a Confederate installation named after Brig. General Gideon J. Pillow.

In 1862 the combined might of the Union army and navy seized control of most of the Mississippi River and West Tennessee, rendering untenable the Confederate position at Fort Pillow, which was abandoned. Union forces moved into the vacant fort, using it as a supply depot and recruitment center.

In 1864, the South got involved in a battle to take the fort back. Forrest attacked the fort which was under the control of General Booth. General Booth had under his control a few more White soldiers than Black soldiers. He was killed by a Confederate sharpshooter early in the battle. And shortly after this, is when the controversy occurs.

There were about twice the number of Blacks that were killed during the attack than Whites. There were 100 of the 295 Whites killed and 200 of the 262 “colored” killed. Forrest, the founder of the KKK after the war, quickly gained control of the battle and offered the Union the opportunity to surrender. But the north refused. So, the attack resumed.

The South won. But, did they kill the Blacks after they surrendered and when they were unarmed, or did they kill the Blacks after they threw down their rifles and then picked-them back up and started shooting again. You know which version the North media promoted as the Battle was a battle-cry used in the Civil War for the North, especially as they destroyed the South at the end of the War.

Most media totally ignore the fact that the Blacks retrieved their rifles after they put them down and began shooting again. They just say that Forrest’s men killed twice the number of Blacks as Whites and made the battle of Ft. Pillow a rallying call for the north.

Do you believe the media?


Haiti is part of an island, originally called Hispaniola, in the Caribbean, that was first discovered by Christopher Columbus in 1492.Haiti is part of an island, originally called Hispaniola, in the Caribbean, that was first discovered by Christopher Columbus in 1492. There were several wars between the Tainios, the inhabitants of Hispaniola, and the Spaniards. The Spaniards won the war.

They soon imported African slaves from Portugal. The first ones came from Western Guinea Africa to Lisbon, Portugal. More and more African slaves came to the island. Soon, sugar was introduced in 1511. More and more slaves came to the island.

Do you know that in 1655, Oliver Cromwell (remember my past sermons), who was the Lord Protectorate of the Republic of England, dispatched a fleet, commanded by Admiral Sir William Penn, to conquer Santo Domingo (Hispaniola). A Spanish defending force of perhaps 400–600 men, mostly militia, repulsed a landing force of 9,000 men.  Yet although the English had failed to overrun the island, they nevertheless seized nearby Jamaica.

The city soon was subjected to a smallpox epidemic, cacao blight, three hurricanes and an earthquake. The entire island of Hispaniola was long under Spanish rule until 1697, when the Spanish rulers handed over the western third of the island to France.

Map of San Domingo (Haiti)The western part of the island became known as San Domingo (France) while the eastern part under Spanish rule was known as Santo Domingo. By the time George Washington was elected president of the United States (1789), the French part of the island (Haiti) was the most prosperous region in the Western part of the world.

How did it get so prosperous? It started out in the 1600s that the farms produced tobacco, cocoa and indigo. There were many small farms who had a few White indentured servants and/or a few slaves. Each farm was prosperous on its own.

But in the 1700s, the crops and farms were changed. The new crops were coffee and sugar and the small farmer became dispossessed and their land became incorporated into sprawling plantations that farmed every available acre. Sugar requires:

  1. Large acreage,

  2. Many laborers, and

  3. Large capital outlay.

By the time George Washington took his first oath of office, the number of sugar plantations numbered 800 with the number of coffee plantations 3,000. Their produce supplied not only the mother country, France, but half of Europe.

The island basically only grew the two money crops; they had to import food to feed their slaves and themselves. This caused a problem when France was fighting an enemy. What happened when their rival would blockade their food supply? Many would die of starvation.

The population was divided into four castes:

  1. Whites…36,000;

  2. Free coloreds (which included both Mulattoes and Negroes) …26,000;

  3. Mulatto slaves…40,000; and

  4. African slaves…450,000.

There were several major problems:

First, there was the number of White men (25,000) to White women (11,000), over 2 to 1. They were living on an island. It was difficult to go anywhere else. They violated God’s law on race-mixing or miscegenation. It gave rise to a Mulatto population.

Second, the need for large capital outlay resulted in a class of absentee owners, deeply in debt to the Jewish usury bankers, who owned these great plantations but rarely visited them. These owners were living in France and had bought the small farms and were now running large plantations.

Third, the Roman Catholic Church violated God’s Law against interracial marriage. They also violated God’s Law against monopoly, as they had one-third of the land and close to half the floating wealth of the both France and the colony that was based on the island. They had gained this wealth through many generations in payment for prayers for the unfortunate “faithful” who might otherwise spend eternity in purgatory. In short, the Church allowed the Mulatto problem to develop.

What happened next? The French Revolution.

The San Domingo (Haiti) production of sugar and coffee halted. This stopped the income needed by the owners of the wealthy plantations in San Domingo: i.e. the French king, his nobles, and the Roman Catholic Church. They needed the money to pay their debts. But when the production stopped, the money no longer came in. So, the debts went into default. The French Revolution foreclosed on these properties and banished the owners.

The “puppet” Napoleon was defeated, and the lands seized from him. The great prize of two-thirds of France was now firmly in the hands of the international Jewish usury bankers, which was protected by the allied armies of the world.

The French Revolution was a successful _________ operation. What word is missing? It is “business”. The French Revolution was a successful business operation.


How did the usury banking establishment gained control over the people of France to control their minds to the point that they had sympathy with the Blacks and Mulattoes?


They bought and controlled the media. They are still doing the same thing that worked in the past. They controlled the media.

Once the usury bankers had bought the media, they supplied the material for them to print. They ignored what had actually happened, and printed any slander, any vilification required. The people read and believed them. They believed the newspapers, magazines and other forms of media; they didn’t believe what the Bible had told them; if they read it at all. The media only told the French what it wanted them to know…not the truth.

The newspapers of that day were established and financed by the usury bankers. Instead of printing the king’s announcements, they printed exclusively news and views that the bankers wanted. They wanted strife and revolution. And revolution is what they got.

They preyed on the natural pity of the French people for the underdog and painted a picture of continuous misery of the Black slave and the vindictive, brutal evil nature of slave owners in a way to make the aristocrats and clergy monsters in the public’s mind.

Since the king and the Roman Catholic Church owned two-thirds of the land which had formerly belonged to the people, and since slavery was an exclusive institution of these two groups, it was natural that the international Jewish financiers would successfully use the slavery issue against the Church and government. Follow the money. It was all there beneath the surface, hidden in plain view. If the people could remove the king and clergy, the land would be ownerless, and the Jewish bankers could foreclose. The media blitz was successful beyond belief.

The establishment repeats what has succeeded in the past. For example, in England the king’s land could not be disposed as long as the king lived. So, they got the king to flee for his life which was given as an excuse to execute him. The Puritan, Oliver Cromwell was chosen for this job.

The same thing was done in France. The French king was frightened into fleeing. He was caught and executed. Any government that holds land or wealth is fair game.

Once the king was dead, the establishment media was the only voice that was heard in France. It was a monopoly. It could not be answered, and no one knew how to quiet it. Its hammering of the same radical viewpoint led people to believe that “everyone” had the same view. Every event that took place in the colonies was twisted to disinform and mislead.

Every blow, every whipping, every execution was stripped out of context, placed under a magnifying glass, and made to appear as a further example of colonial inhumanity. The population of France underwent non-stop stories said to be the daily fare of the slaves.

The French public, based on what they were told, were clearly justified in their sympathy with the Blacks and Mulattoes. But what they had been told were lies. But what they had been told were falsehoods. But what they had been told was not the truth. The establishment press mounted the ladder of success by painting a picture of San Domingo that did not exist. The establishment press was paid to create revolution. And it was successful.

The prize was San Domingo. The campaign was choregraphed by the media. Carefully chosen radical French leaders were made prominent by media exposure and rose to power. San Domingo was no problem until the media made it a problem, and media-selected politicians provided a solution.

The San Domingo revolt was a media event. The establishment media got possession of the plantations, but it resulted in the elimination of all the White people who lived in Haiti. Let me repeat this, all the White people in Haiti were killed. There were no White people who were left.

And now, two hundred years later, the most prosperous country of all the island colonies has become the poorest country in the Caribbean, if not the whole world. The other country on the rest of the island, Dominican Republic, has an economy that is 600 times more prosperous than Haiti.

There were Black insurrections, war with England, disease epidemics; but the final outcome was the White population was completely and totally eliminated in Haiti. The regicide, the guillotine, the empire, the battles, the mountains of bodies, the massacres were incidental. They were only the footsteps of racial strangers to God’s Law, who, hid behind the media, money, politicians and armies. They passed unrecognized. They didn’t suffer a sleepless night and they now owned the land. And that is what they always do.

The same thing is happening right before our eyes. I constantly hear people say that the media is a “leftist” media. And they are correct.


For example, the media said that “all women should be believed” when Brett Kavanaugh was being nominated for the Supreme Court. A whole host of Democrats made their speeches that was carried by every newspaper, television station and radio as well as internet. “I believe all the women accusers of Kavanaugh.”

But now when the shoe is on the other foot, the Democratic nominee for president, Joe Biden, is accused of doing even a worse thing than Kavanaugh was accused of doing, the Democrats (including all the women who believed the women who testified against Kavanaugh) all believe in “good old Joe” and endorse him.

The media totally ignores any accusation against him and all his mafia dealings with the countries that he was put in charge of. He is as rotten as any politician we have ever had. He has dementia and is partially senile. And the media is silent. They just keep on writing articles and having “experts” who attack president Trump.

The media: newspapers, magazines, television, cable, internet, billboards, speakers, etc. are controlled in the United States. Who controls them? Could it possibly be the same people who control the media in France two hundred years ago? I believe that it is.


Do you remember the late John McCain? Some people believe that he was a traitor who was responsible for many deaths as he show-boated on a plane that caused an explosion and killed many sailors. Do you remember that he was captured as a prisoner-of-war and was regarded as a traitor by many of his fellow soldiers? Do you remember how he voted when he was in the Senate?

But the media loved him. When he died, most politicians, news anchors and Senators praised him over and over. Anyone who disagreed with him were vilified. I bet you have never heard the story of how he rose in power. The media kept this part of the story a secret.

Do you know who John McCain married? He married Cindy Hensley. His wife was the daughter of Jim Hensley. Who was Jim Hensley?

The media is silent about the origins of the Hensley fortune that financed McCain’s rise to power. The Hensley fortune is no more than a regional offshoot of the vast bootlegging and rackets empire of the Bronfman dynasty who, in turn, were major players in the crime syndicate ruled by Meyer Lansky and his partners.

The media keeps silent about Bronfman—Lansky—Capone—Luciano—Siegel—Torrio-- Castello—Colosimo—Hensley—Marley--all part of the Jewish mafia organization run by the Bronfman’s. The Bronfman’s start was Seagram’s Liquor Company in Canada and later included:

  • DuPont Chemical company,

  • Campbell Soup,

  • Schlitz Brewing,

  • Colgate-Palmolive,

  • Kellogg,

  • Nabisco,

  • Norton Simon,

  • Quaker Oats,

  • Paramount Pictures,

  • Warrington Products,

  • Various real estate companies,

  • Etc.

Hensley worked for Marley, who basically oversaw Bronfman’s alcohol business in Arizona. In 1948, Hensley was prosecuted by federal prosecutors for falsifying liquor violations. Hensley got a six-month suspended sentence. And in 1953, Hensley was prosecuted by federal prosecutors for falsifying liquor records.

But it is common knowledge that young attorney William Rehnquist acted as the “mouthpiece” and he got them off scot-free. Rehnquist later became chief justice of the Supreme Court and presided over the “fix” that made George W. Bush president in a rightly disputed election.

Hensley was rewarded by Marley by being given the Anheuser-Busch beer distributorships in Arizona, which is one of the largest beer distributors in the nation. The media implied that the Hensley’s company was a “mom and pop” operation that became a big success; but the real story goes to the history of organized crime at the highest levels. The media keeps the knowledge of organized crime hidden.

While John McCain himself cannot be held personally responsible for the sins of his late father-in-law (whose fortune was passed on to his daughter, Cindy McCain, John’s wife), hhe fact is that “reformer” McCain owed his political and financial fortunes to the good graces of the biggest names in organized crime. Are you surprised that the Las Vegas gambling industry was one of McCain’s primary financial benefactors? And do you think that it is strange that McCain was one of Israeli’s leading United States supporters? McCain was Bronfman’s personal Senator.

The media would protect that information and never would let anyone know. No wonder he was depicted as a hero by the media, ignoring the small outcry of his traitorous behavior.


Finally, what do you think of the words “Jews” and “Gentiles”. They are not even words that are in the original English translations of the Bible, but now they are translated in many verses. Most “Judeo-Christians” believe what the media wants them to believe. “Jew” means the descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob while “Gentiles” means everyone else.

At first, it may make sense. When I was an American Baptist that is what I was taught. But I didn’t read the Bible very much. And when I read it, I didn’t understand it. It was too confusing for me. I knew that the Bible told us about Abram, who God made an everlasting covenant with; both with him and his descendants—Isaac and Jacob. They eventually wound up in Egypt where they became slaves. Moses was chosen to lead them out. There were all kinds of miracles that occurred as they crossed the Red Sea and eventually made their way to the promised land. God was their king and He said that they were His people. The American Baptists along with the Catholics and most of the Protestants say that that was the Jews.

This was the people that Jesus was born into. In short, they say that Jesus was a Jew. He used to be the King of this people. But wait a minute! Was Jesus really a Jew? If he was, then He would be related to Bronfman, Hensley, and Al Capone? What do the Jews say?

They lie. They say publicly that they are descended from Judah, Levi and Benjamin. That makes them and Jesus being descended from the same kingdom, most from the same tribe, if it were true. But it would still not be all of Israel. For there was another kingdom of Israelites.

The Roman Catholic Church was the first to use the words, “Jews” and “Gentiles”. They said that they meant that salvation was universal. But their error was carried on by Martin Luther, John Calvin, and the Wesley brothers together with cult leaders such as William Miller, Joseph Smith, and many, many others. The common teaching is that the “Jews” are Israel and the “Gentiles” are everyone else. And since this traditional teaching is so ingrained in commentaries, concordances, Bible dictionaries, books and in people’s minds, it is very hard for anyone brought up with this belief to shake it off. The modern-day media teaches that this is the correct translation.

The media says that the words translated as “Gentile” in the KJV translation of the Bible are:

Hebrew: Greek:

gowy, goi, goyim ethos, ethne

374 times as “nations” 64 times as “nations”

143 times as “heathen” 5 times as “heathen”

30 times as “gentile(s)” 93 times as “gentile(s)”

11 times as “people ‘ 2 times as “people”

Let’s look at a few of the many scriptures where these words are used:

Genesis 12:1, 2:

1). “Now the LORD had said unto Abram, Get thee out of thy country; and from thy kindred and from thy father’s house, unto a land that I will shew thee:

2) And I will make of thee a great [Gentile] nation, and I will bless thee, and make thy name great; and thou shall be a blessing.”

Think about these two verses for a second. If the media is correct, God made a great non-Israel “gentile” nation out of Abram.

Genesis 25:23“And the LORD said unto her [Rebecca], Two [gentiles] nations are in thy womb, and two manner of people shall be separated from thy bowels: and the one people shall be stronger than the other people; and the elder shall serve the younger.”

Rebecca had two gentiles, meaning non-Israel nations in her womb? These two sons were named Esau and Jacob. Did they both become non-Israel nations?

Jeremiah 31:36“If these ordinances [the sun and the moon] depart from me, saith the LORD, then the seed of Israel also shall cease from being a [gentile] nation before me for ever.”

Would Israel cease from being a non-Israel nation? Would Israel cease from being a gentile nation? Would Israel cease from being a heathen nation?

Acts 10:22“And they said, Cornelius the centurion, a just man, and one that feareth God, and of good report among all the [Gentiles] nation of the Jews, was warned from God by an holy angel to sent for thee into his house, and to hear words of thee.”

Cornelius was the first Gentile (many Judeo-Christians say) who was saved. But who are the “Gentiles of the Jews”? It doesn’t make any sense.

But what does make sense? When you read the Bible, you discover that the nation of Israel was divided into several parts during their history. The northern part of the nation became one of two nations, who became entirely separate nations. They eventually became divorced. They were scattered. They became “not the people of God.” This is a marvelous revelation that the majority of Judeo-Christians have never heard. They had been divorced for almost 700 years.

Less than 50,000 of the Kingdom of Judah had returned to Jerusalem and many of them had racially intermarried. But they had been joined by many of their enemies in their land. Edomites, Babylonians, Syrians, etc. were all there. But the land was divided into three regions. Which region did Jesus feel the most comfortable? Which region did Jesus pick the majority of His disciples? In which region did Jesus do most of His preaching?

The three regions were:

  1. Galilee

  2. Samaria

  3. Judea

John 7:1“After these things Jesus walked in Galilee: for he would not walk in Jewry, because the Jews sought to kill him.”

Galilee was where Jesus lived most of his life. The tribe of Benjamin were the inhabitants that mainly lived there. Babylonians and other non-Israelites were the major dwellers in Samaria. The tribe of Judah and Edomites (Jews) were the conflicting nations that lived here.

Many Christians seem to think that Jesus dwelt among “The Jews” in Jerusalem, but this is not true. Most Christians seem to think that Jerusalem was the center-point of Jesus’ teaching ministry. Jesus only went to Jerusalem at particular times for particular purposes.

But it was in Galilee that Jesus lived and performed most of His ministry. And these people, in places like Matthew 4:15 and 16 are called ________? The Israelites who were living in Galilee were referred to as being “Gentiles” in many translations.


Do you believe the media?

  • Do you believe that Anthony Fauci didn’t give $3.7 to the Wuhan lab;

  • Do you believe the Obama’s daughter is not a close friend to Joe Biden’s granddaughter;

  • Do you believe that there is any company like McKinsey & Company that prepares American industry to leave the country and build manufacturing in other countries;

  • Do you believe that Ft. Pillow was a massacre by Forrest’s men who slaughtered unarmed negroes;

  • Do you believe that Haiti didn’t kill all the White people in that country;

  • Do you believe that Joe Biden is innocent when his son, brothers, sister, friends made multi-millions from nations in which he oversaw and that the “me-too” movement is not to be believed when the charges are against him;

  • Do you believe that John McCain was an American hero;

  • Do you believe that the Jews are the people who are living in the country by the same name in the Middle East and all over the world and the Gentiles are everyone else?

Do you believe what the media is teaching? The media is a far-far-far-left, pro-Democratic media which supports the communist’s viewpoints. Or do you believe what the Word of God teaches? Which one do you believe?

To be continued.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.