Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore
November 28, 2021
Scripture Reading: Joshua 24:15: “And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the LORD, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”
Buy and read this book, “The Real Anthony Fauci” written by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. It tells about Bill Gates, Big Pharma and the Global War on the countries of the world. It explains all the criminal activity that Dr. Anthony Fauci has been involved in. Big Tech has cancelled all advertising for this book, which is the reason I am advertising for it. It is a best seller anyway.
And now we have this very strange phenomeon in beauty pageants this year: Miss England and Miss Ireland Are Both Black This Year.
Are we supposed to believe that these two women; Rehemia Muthamia of England and Pamela Uba of Ireland, are far more beautiful than any of the white women who live on these two isles? Miss England 2021 grew up in Kenya, Africa, speaks four languages and escaped an abusive relationship. Miss Ireland 2021 fled South Africa as an asylum seeker looking to start a new life in Ireland when she was a young girl.
And now we have trannies and affirmative action contestants winning competitions, showing just how rigged these contests truly are. The same agenda has been playing in beauty pageants across the Western World.
|Miss USA||Miss Teen USA||Miss America|
They are all black in 2021!
Don’t you think it’s a little bit strange when the population of blacks in England is 3%; the population of blacks in Ireland is 1%; and the population of blacks in America is 13% and they have won each of the five beauty contests given in these three nations this year. And there are other minorities in these countries besides blacks; i.e. Orientals, Hispanics, Indians and Muslims and Jews. And blacks were the winners of the beauty pageants in all three of these former pure nations?
“ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL”
When the Continental Congress adopted the Declaration of Independence on July 4, 1776, it was a call for the right of statehood rather than individual liberties. Many scores of years later many Americans began reading the affirmation that “all men are created equal” in different ways than the framers intended. When the Continental Congress adopted the historic text drafted by Thomas Jefferson, they did not intend it to mean individual equality. Rather, what they declared was that American colonists, as a people, had the same rights to self-government as other nations. Because they possessed this fundamental right, they could establish new governments within each of the states and collectively assume their “separate and equal station” with other nations. It was only in the decades after the American Revolutionary War that the phrase acquired its compelling reputation as a statement of individual equality.
For Americans, equality is a word that has been expanded in its definition since the founding of the country. For Jefferson and many of our Founding Fathers, the phrase “…that all men are created equal…” really meant that “all free, property-owning [white] males are created equal”.
Questioned Frederick Douglass in his Rochester speech:
“Are the great principles of political freedom and of natural justice embodied in that Declaration of Independence extended to us?” All races and the other gender [women] have moved, in the last century in the United States, to achieve full legal equality.”
The written law does not look at one’s race but at the crime committed; the sentencing should not be dependent on the race of the convict or does it? The Constitution is not the Christian’s main book that determines what is right or wrong. It is the Holy Scriptures. What does the LORD God of the United States and of the other Israelite nations say? Does He agree with the modern thought that everyone in the nation is under the same law? Sola Scriptura.
Deuteronomy 14:21a: “Ye shall not eat of any thing that dieth of itself: thou shalt give it unto the stranger that is in thy gates, that he my eat it; or thou mayest sell it unto an alien: for thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God….”
“Ye”, the “holy people unto the LORD thy God”, the Israelites are not allowed to eat the animal that dies of itself, but the racial stranger may, and the alien can. These three different groups of individuals are not equal.
Ezekiel 36:5: "Therefore thus saith the Lord God; Surely in the fire of my jealousy have I spoken against the residue of the heathen, and against all Idumea [descendants of Edom], which have appointed My land into their possession with the joy of all their heart, with despiteful minds, to cast it out for a prey.
The LORD God is against Edom and parts of the heathen who occupied His land. The Edomites are not equal.
Deuteronomy 17:15b: “Thou mayest not set a stranger [Zuwr -- racial alien] over thee which is not thy brother.”
Who should you put as one of your rulers? The racial strangers, Barack Obama and Kamala Harris, are not equal to our brothers.
Deuteronomy 23:20: “Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the LORD thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it.”
Who is an Israelite allowed to lend interest to and who are they not allowed to lend interest to? If you do it wrong, you are not blessed of Almighty God.
20) “For of old time I have broken thy yoke, and burst thy bands; and thou saidist, I will not transgress; [a reference to the Exodus from Egypt and the promises that Israel would keep the law] when upon every high hill and under every green tree thou wanderest, playing the harlot.
21) Yet I had planted thee a noble vine, wholly a right seed: how then art thou turned into the degenerate plant of a strange vine unto me?
22) For though thou wash thee with nitre, and take thee much soap, yet thine iniquity is marked before me, saith the Lord GOD.”
Who are the “right” seed and who are the descendants of the “strange” vine? They are certainly not equal. The Baal religion of the ancient world was a sexual fertility cult which compelled people to commit fornication, and its purveyors were the Canaanites, who are indeed the antecedents of today’s Arabs and Jews. Does anyone think these two seeds are equal? There are different kinds of people, are there not? And the LORD God has a chosen people!
Leviticus 20:16: “And if a woman approach unto any beast, and lie down thereto, thou shall kill the woman, and the beast they shall surely be put to death: their blood shall be upon them.”
Who is the “beast”? Iis it an ox or a chicken or a deer or a two-legged beast? And so, Phineas was accused not of murder, but rather he was rewarded for keeping the law!
Deuteronomy 23:2: “A bastard shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to his tenth generation shall he not enter into the congregation of the LORD.”
How can a bastard be equal to anyone who is qualified to enter the congregation of the LORD?
Leviticus 20:13: “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death; their blood shall be upon them.”
I got this from the following website: https://www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/2015/08/the_7_bible_verses_on_homosexu.html:
“The Book of Leviticus in the Old Testament has two references condemning homosexuality: ‘Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable’ (Leviticus 18:22) and ‘If a man lies with a man as one lies with woman, both of them have done what is detestable. They must be put to death; their blood will be on their own heads’ (Leviticus 20:13).
While condemnations of gay sex are unequivocal in Leviticus, it also is part of a long list of Jewish laws, some of which are not followed by Christians today. [It is not followed by most Jews either.]
For instance, Leviticus bans tattoos, pork and shellfish, offers the proper rules for selling a slave and says a ‘foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born.’ Leviticus also advocates the death penalty for adultery.”
The argument shows one of the many fallacies of the Judeo-Christian theology. It says that Leviticus, and the rest of the Old Testament, is Jewish. Again, I must ask, is it for Kenite, or Canaanite, or Indian, Edomite or Ashkenazi, or orthodox, or reformed, or Hassidic, or Sephardic Jews? This website is giving the LGBTQ individuals the right to do the opposite of what the Bible says is correct behavior. It even ignores the death penalty for the crime.
So, they say that the Old Testament does not apply to the non-Jew. Therefore, they say, that everything in the Old Testament does not apply to us. But if the Old Testament is not for us, why is the New Testament for us?
And on and on it goes. There is a difference between Israelites and racial strangers in the Bible. We are to follow God’s laws; not our Constitution in the places where it differs from the laws of our God.
Etc., Etc., Etc.
Joshua 24:15: “And if it is evil in your eyes to serve the LORD, choose this day whom you will serve, whether the gods your fathers served in the region beyond the River, or the gods of the Amorites in whose land you dwell. But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD.”
Joshua gave his fellow Israelites a challenge. He told them that they had one big choice to make. Which God or god would they serve?
- Would they serve the gods that their fathers had served previously, or
- The gods of the foreigners who were living in their land, or
- Would they serve the LORD God of Israel?
Isn’t this the exact same choice that we have today? Notice that Joshua did not ask the Canaanites this same question.
Here is what one website, https://www.pastortheologians.com said about racial reconciliation; which they say is now the true gospel:
“Yes, racial reconciliation is a gospel issue. For gospel and church must not and – by grace – cannot in fact be separated from each other. Race only ever becomes a non-gospel issue where the gospel has first degenerated into a gnostic offer of liberation for the individual soul apart from participation in Christ’s flesh by faith and communion in his body by love. But for the orthodox Faith, the socio-political problem of racial division is one of the works of the Devil that Jesus came in our flesh to destroy; and the Pentecostal solution of racial harmony through Christ’s blood and by Christ’s Spirit is essential to the gospel of grace. For the saving purpose of God is not merely to redeem individual souls but to create a new yet still thoroughly human people for himself. [What? The saving purpose of God is to create a ‘hu(e)man people for Himself’] “You are a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for his own possession, that you may proclaim the excellencies of him who called you out of darkness into his marvelous light. Once you were not a people, but now you are God’s people; once you had not received mercy, but now you have received mercy” (1 Pet 2.9-10).”
There is no need to examine all aspects of this paragraph; just the Scripture (1Peter 2:9-10) that he used to support his arguments. But before we criticize this interpretation, we will look at what another website says about this passage:
In the website, https://www.bibleref.com/1-Peter/2/1-Peter-2-10.html it concurs with what was previously said and adds an additional view.
“In verse 10 [of 1Peter 2], Peter references Hosea 2:23. This Old Testament prophet was a living symbol of God’s willingness to forgive sin, and to redeem mankind. Even though Hosea’s wife was constantly unfaithful, he forgave her and rescued her from a life of slavery. Like Israel, all Christians together—the church—have been changed. We have a before and an after. Before, we were not a people. We belonged to ourselves and served only our own desires. But in Christ, we have become God’s people. We have belonging. We have purpose. We have a shared destiny with Him in eternity. [This is universalism!]
Before, we had not received mercy. We would have received the full penalty for our sinful choices. But through faith in Christ, we have received mercy. Our status has been permanently changed. Notice that both statements are in the present tense. We are not seeking and hoping to become God’s people and receive mercy. In Christ, we are God’s people. We have received mercy. The transaction is complete.”
1Peter 2:9-10 tells that all Christians have a before and an after. What kind of before and after?
At least this person knew that Peter was referencing scripture from the book of Hosea. Too bad he doesn’t know who Hosea was writing to. For the person implies the identity of “We” as meaning everyone in the world, including the wicked seed line, can become Christian, i.e. universalism.
He totally ignored what Hosea, the Israelite prophet, was saying in chapter two of his book. This false prophet is saying that Hosea taught that there are many people of all races that were before not the people of God, but by faith [after] are now God’s people; i.e. they have received God’s mercy.
Here is what this false prophet is saying in his commentary on Hosea and what the disciple Peter is writing to and about:
Everyone in the world:
Before: All the people in the world did not receive God’s mercy
After: Then those who became Christian did receive God’s mercy. The rest have still not received God’s mercy.
He misidentifies the individuals that Hosea specially says that he was addressing. He totally ignores the people who received mercy from God; i.e. they never was a people who did not receive mercy? Is there such a people? Did Hosea say that there was a people that received mercy?
Who was Hosea talking about anyway? Here is the Scripture from Hosea that Peter was quoting. It would have ruined the false prophet’s argument if he had quoted this verse instead of just referring to it.
Hosea 2:23: “And I will sow HER unto Me in the earth: and I will have MERCY upon HER that had not obtained mercy: and I will say to THEM which were not My people, THOU art My people: and THEY shall say, Thou art my God.”
Who was Hosea taking to? Who was “her” and “them” and “thou” and “they”? Who are the people that God says that He will have mercy upon on that had not obtained mercy? It is the people that Hosea referred to as not obtaining mercy in Hosea 1:6.
Hosea 1:6: “And she [Gomer, the daughter of Diblaim] conceived again, and bare a daughter. And God said unto him, Call her name Loruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon ….”
What do you think is the rest of this sentence? Let’s take a little test? Is it …
- Everyone in the world, or
- The House of Judah, or
- The House of Israel, or
- The entire nation of Israel, or
- The Kenites, Canaanites, Edomites and Ashkenazi?
Let’s look at chapter 1, verse 6 with the pronouns explained:
Hosea 1:6: “And she [Gomer, the daughter of Diblaim] conceived again, and bare a daughter. And God said unto him [Hosea], Call her name Loruhamah [representing the house of Israel]: for I [LORD God of Israel] will no more have mercy upon the upon the house of Israel, but I will utterly take them away.”
Hosea was telling his listeners that Almighty God was divorcing the House of Israel as a punishment for not keeping His laws. He was taking them away in captivity in His judgment. So, the correct answer as to who Hosea is referring to in his comment that they would no longer receive any of their God’s mercy is “C”, the house of Israel. That is a small part of the world’s population at that time.
But what about the other house or kingdom? Israel had split into two diverse kingdoms:
- The house of Judah; 3 tribes, and
- The house of Israel; 10 tribes.
The house of Israel existed for almost 2 ½ centuries. In fact, the United States would be a nation for as long as the house of Israel was in the year 2022!
Hosea 1:7: “But I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will save them by the LORD their God, and will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen.”
Well, that ruins their argument. Again, let us look at what the Judeo-Christian website said: “Before, we had not received mercy. We would have received the full penalty for our sinful choices. But through faith [after] in Christ, we have received mercy.”
They are saying that it was everyone on the earth that could be the “we”. But Hosea says that there is no one, but a portion of one race only, who was at one time “not God’s people” but are now God’s people.
Hosea says that it was only the house of Israel that would receive no longer any mercy from Almighty God, but the other house, the house of Judah would receive mercy. Peter was writing to the people who were descendants of the house of Israel. For he was quoting Hosea.
Who was Peter writing to? Everyone in the world? No! 1Peter 1:1-2 tells us that he was writing to the strangers [#3927 or pilgrims] scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Agia, and Bithynia, the elect [Israelites] according to the foreknowledge of God.
Who were these strangers? They certainly weren’t everyone in the world. They were of the former House of Israel who were in a small region of the world.
But the verse Peter is referring to says that it was only the house of Israel that would no longer receive God’s mercy, but later in the chapter it says that they would receive God’s mercy. These people had God’s mercy, lost it, but receive it again. But Someone had to be sacrificed for their sin of breaking the covenant. It would take over 700 years before their sacrificial lamb was slaughtered and their sins were forgiven, and they were placed back into the covenant relationship. They were awaiting their perfect sacrificial and resurrection lamb.
At the same time the house of Israel would receive no mercy, the house of Judah would receive mercy; they would be the recipients of a miraculous blessing. The house of Judah would defeat the most powerful army in the world at that time without shooting them with the arrow, or slashing them with the sword, or by killing them in a great battle, or by overcoming them with horses.
This battle was greater than what happen in South Africa in 1838! And this can happen once again. The LORD God of Israel saved His kingdom by saving the capital city of Jerusalem by causing a massive fatal division in the Assyrian army. The enemy destroyed itself.
The house of Judah later also became divorced. What did this mean? By God’s law, the husband, if the wife was divorced, could not remarry her if she had other husbands. They both had several other husbands. This meant that either Israel had to die, or God had to die and be resurrected. This was the whole purpose of the crucifixion, for upon Christ’s dying, the way was clear for Him to once again marry Israel as he had done before.
Here’s a chart of who Hosea was writing to:
House of Israel
House of Judah
|Received God’s mercy||Received God’s mercy|
|Did not receive God’s mercy and was destroyed as a nation||Received God’s mercy once again and was saved as a nation when God destroyed the Assyrian army|
|Will receive God’s mercy and be placed back into a new Covenant||Later received God’s mercy and placed in a new Covenant|
But before this happened, let’s examine what Joshua said to his fellow Israelites. First, where did he have the leaders of the nation of the covenant heirs go to hear the message?
Joshua 24:1: “And Joshua gathered all the tribes of Israel to Shechem, and called for the elders of Israel, and for their heads, and for their judges, and for their officers; and they presented themselves before God.”
Shechem was in the region of the tribe of Ephraim and was the first capital of the nation of Israel. Shechem was a strategic location for this important ceremony. Joshua called on the Israelites to renew formally their commitment to the Mosaic Covenant at the site that was very motivating to them to do so. When the split of the nation occurred, Shechem became the capital city of the House of Israel; Jerusalem remained the capital city of the House of Judah.
- God had first appeared to Abraham in Shechem when he had entered the land and promised to give him the land of Canaan. In response to that promise, Abraham built his first altar in the land there.
- Jacob buried his father-in-law’s idols at this location [Shechem] after returning to the Promise Land from Paddan-aram. He made this his home and built an altar to God there, too.
- The same generation of Israelites that Joshua now addressed had pledged themselves to the Mosaic Covenant shortly after it had entered the land. They had also built an altar there [Shechem].
- Joshua later erected the “stone of witness” and buried it under the same oak tree that was next to the altar that Abraham had built in Shechem.
- Joshua chose the same place [Shechem] for the renewal of the covenant, because this act involved a practical renunciation on the part of Israel of all idolatry.
- Jacob had bought from Hamor, the father of Shechem, a parcel of ground, part of which was used as a gravesite for his people. He paid 100 pieces of silver for it. It was in this gravesite that Joseph, who the children of Israel brought up out of Egypt, was buried.
But there is more to the story. Shechem, the Hivite [Canaanite] saw the daughter of Jacob whose name was Dinah. Shechem then seized her and had sexual relations with her. Shechem asked his father, Hamor, to get him Dinah for his wife. Hamor spoke with Jacob and told him that they should make marriages with them. If they did, they could trade and get property.
But this was a very big question. What was Jacob and his family to do. Would they only marry their kin, or would they engage in marrying into the line of the strange seed? Would Israel remain separate or would they become inclusive? Would they serve their LORD God, or would they serve the god of the Canaanites? It is the old story of universalism verses exclusivity. It the same question that faces pure Israelites today; will they marry a person of another race or will they only marry a person of their same race?
Most Christians don’t want to hear what happened next, for the sons of Jacob lied to Shechem and Hamor and told them that they would participate in marriages with them if they would only be circumcised and be like they were. The two Canaanites readily agreed. And as soon as they informed the men of Shechem what needed to be done, they were all circumcised. The Canaanites had agreed to be like the Israelites.
Shortly after the Canaanites had performed the slight surgery on their private parts, two of the sons of Jacob, Simeon and Levi, attacked and killed every one of them while they were still sore. Their soreness had hindered them greatly from defending themselves. As a result, they (Simeon and Levi) rescued their sister, Dinah, from their enemies and took her home. They (Simeon and Levi), in defending their actions to their father, said,
Genesis 34:31: “ But they [Simeon and Levi] replied, Should Shechem have treated our sister like a prostitute?”
JOSHUA CHAPTER 24
Chapter 24 of the book of Joshua is one of the most important chapters in the Bible. For it describes how Joshua did not merely settle for a series of public admonitions in order to guide Israel after his death, but describes a formal covenant renewal enacted at the site of Shechem for the purpose of getting a binding commitment on the part of the people of Israel to the written Word of God.
Joshua appealed to the Israelites to commit themselves to serve the LORD God based on all of God’s great acts that He had done for them. For example:
- He was the One who had brought them up out of the land of bondage in Egypt. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who had provided the miracles of the Passover. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who had done all the great signs in their sight. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who had saved them from the Egyptian army by putting up a barrier and then dividing the water of the Gulf of Aqaba and leading them to safety. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who had provided to them their angel food for 40 years in the wilderness -- manna. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who had driven out from before them all the Amorites, including the giants, which had dwelt in the land east of the Jordan River. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who had led Israel in destroying the mighty city of Jericho by having their walls miraculously tumble down. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who had sent a miraculous, sudden hailstorm that granted His nation a victory over the five nations that united against them. It wasn’t any other god.
- He was the One who …. (countless other events). It wasn’t any other god.
We will serve that LORD, for He is OUR God; not any other race’s god. Why would we want to forsake the God who has proven Himself to us by helping us and then serve other peoples’ gods. We are His people, not the other races.
It is like what the Afrikaners did in South Africa. How could the generations of the Afrikaners forsake the God of their fathers, who had given them a spectacular victory, and then over a century and a half later, celebrate “Racial Reconciliation Day”, instead of the “Day of the Covenant”? The Afrikaners forsook their LORD and God and served the gods of the Zulus. Do you think that smoke is coming out of the nose of our former LORD and king?
The world is up-side down. At least it is in the United States. Most Christians are in love with the antichrists and many are not aware that their ancestors kicked them out of their countries in Europe several centuries ago. Very few Christians have even read the Bible, the source of all the doctrines of “True Christianity”. And the strange thing is that they think that they know what it says or doesn’t say.
The Jews hate Kyle Rittenhouse because he killed a Jew, Joseph Rosenbaum, who was a convicted child molester who had just got out of an insane asylum. Geraldo Rivera is Jewish. His mother was Jewish, and Geraldo had a bar mitzvah ceremony. But in terms of attitude, with regards to Kyle, this guy is a disgusting Jew, who hates Kyle and does all he can to misrepresent and even totally LIE about what Kyle did. They seek revenge.
We now live in a country where one political party is the pro-Jewish Communists universal Party (Democrat) and the other Party (Republican) is the pro-Jewish anti-racism universal Party. We have disobeyed our LORD God. We have no political party to save us. We only have the LORD God to deliver us once again.
I don’t know what you are going to do. If you think that it is evil to serve the LORD God of our people, then you can serve any of the two pro-Jewish political parties. You can keep any of the laws of the false gods that you want, but there will be the judgment of our LORD.
But as for me and my house, we will serve the LORD God who faithfully honors the covenant that He made with our fathers. We will serve the local church that He built. We will keep as many of the laws that He has only given to us. We trust only in our one LORD God.
1) “And God spake all these words, saying,
2) I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.
3) Thou shalt have no other gods before me.”
Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.