Evil Good and Good Evil - Part 3

SLAVERY

Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

Click here to view the playlist of the entire 2020 October Conference

October 11, 2020

Scripture Reading: Exodus 22:25:

“If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as a usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.”

Let me introduce myself to you. First of all, I come to you with the blessings of The Fellowship of God’s Covenant People of Florence, Kentucky. The men of our church put their hands on myself and Jim Jester and asked that some in this audience might be blessed by hearing the words of our LORD God.

I don’t know if I met Pastor Dan Gayman or Pastor Everett Siliven first. I wasn’t a pastor when I first met both men. But I will talk about Pastor Gayman first. A member of our Bible study group heard about his church and suggested that we go there for one of the Feast Days that they celebrate (they still do). So, off we went.

After attending a couple of the Church of Israel’s Feast Days, Pastor Dan heard that we had a regular, weekly Bible study. Eventually, he asked me if I would consider being ordained by his church. To make the story short, I said that I would, after I talked it over with my study group. The study group agreed that I should be ordained. It took two years, but I was ordained by the Church of Israel. Pastor Gayman has one of the best newsletters and collection of books available in the nation on who Israel is in the world today.

Pastor Siliven was speaking, along with some young preachers in Van Wert, Ohio. There was a young Pastor by the name of Pete Peters, Pastor Jerry Wickey, Pastor Bruce McCarthy, Richard Hoskins and others. Pastor Siliven, when he was a Baptist preacher in Nebraska, had his church padlocked, was put in jail; all because he didn’t understand about what the 501c3 was all about. He has made many changes from that day and has become one of my best friends. He has suffered under the jewish powers in this country but has not let that bother him. He eventually changed his real last name, which was Ramsey, and has written some of the most outstanding books about the truth of who Israel is and the consequences of their sins.

Pastor Charles Jennings I met at one of the Church of Israel’s Feast Days. We eventually got together, and he preached at my church and I preached at his. He has made his magazine one of the most outstanding in Christian-Identity circles.

Then there is Pastor Blanchard and his wife Sandi. He moved from Seattle and came to our church as co-pastor. He was at our church for several years, maybe closer to a decade. His wonderful series of books was the result of a Bible study classes that he held on Saturdays. They eventually became his outstanding book series and then his Bible Boot camp discs. I dare anyone to read them and deny the Israel truth.

The one preacher in this conference that I have known for the shortest time is Dave Barley. One of the reasons is that he lives in Idaho and I live in northern Kentucky. I heard, like a lot of us did, Sheldon Emry on the radio and he had a lot of influence on what I came to believe. Dave is married to Sheldon’s daughter. I met him at the first Homecoming Conference, and I have gotten to know him better each seceding conference. I consider it a privilege to call him my friend.

Lastly, is my current co-pastor, Jim Jester. Jim took over after our last co-pastor died – Pastor Mark Downey. I wish you could have met Pastor Mark, for he was an outstanding preacher. We didn’t agree on everything, in fact, I will tell you a little secret. I don’t agree with anyone in this conference on everything – I don’t even agree with myself. But we all agree with the major doctrines that make us Christian Identity.

Pastor Jim took over when Mark died, and he has grown greatly as a pastor. His sermon, which he will preach after I am finished, was one of the best I ever heard. He has gotten better and better until now I consider him a better preacher than myself. In fact, I consider myself the least of all these great orators. It is a blessing that I am even considered to speak to you today.

But it isn’t just the preachers, it is their wives. Pastor Gayman lost his dear wife, Deloris, about nine years ago, but has continued onward. Pastor Ramsey lost his dear wife, Tressie, but was given another one, Linda, who has encouraged him greatly. Pastor Jenning’s wife, Marilee, has been a great encourager wife to him, and can anyone imagine Larry without Sandi? Dave has his wonderful wife, Martha, and Jim has Laura who has inspired our whole church as to how she has overcome her trials and health difficulties. And then there is my wife, Randa, who has let me study in my office, typing out my sermons and putting out the New Covenant Messengers. She now is the one who puts our monthly discs together and gets them ready to be mailed each month. She is now home taking care of our daughter who has the shingles. We are thankful to our LORD for giving to us our wonderful wives.

I have been blessed to have known many of the preachers and their wives, who have taught me the great truths of the Bible. I started out as an Arminian, then became a Calvinist, and eventually reached the truth in becoming a Christian Identity minister. I traveled to Romania in Europe and to Australia where I preached at Hendrik Roelof’s with his many children. While in the “land down under” I first met a person that I didn’t know – in fact, I had never heard of him before I went. But we were the two preachers at that Roelof conference. I eventually valued his friendship greatly. His name was Arnold Kennedy. Arnold preached at our church several times as he traveled in the United States after I first met him in Australia – he was from New Zealand.

About 12 years ago, I suffered mini strokes. It knocked me for a loop. I used to have my sermons on notes on a card and I preached from those notes. But since my strokes, I couldn’t preach that way anymore. I couldn’t fill in the blanks. So, I had to write my sermons out completely so I wouldn’t forget anything.

It seemed strange at first, as I always felt it was bad to read a sermon word-for-word. But it worked out great when we got a website. At our church, we put our sermons up on the wall via computer, where our people have the option of reading the sermon as we preach it to them. When the sermon is over, we put both the written and tape portions on our website. You can listen or read or do both to every sermon that is preached at our church.

Now, my sermon.

This is the third part of the series, “Evil Good and Good Evil.” The series explains that there are many of our LORD God’s laws that He has given to us that are not in either the Republican or Democratic party’s platform.

The Democratic National Convention gives us the clue that they are demonic.

Republicans and Democrats believe the opposite on what is the “light”. I believe they are both wrong on their definitions. But the Republicans’ views are a lot better than the Democrats’, for they:

  • Are against the murder of the unborn,
  • Are for school choice,
  • Are for less regulation in businesses,
  • Are for reduced taxes,
  • Are for fracking and energy independence,
  • Are for secure borders,
  • Are for the funding of the police,
  • Are for public control against the Burning, Looting and Murder in the communities,
  • Are for public worship in churches,
  • Are for the suburbs remaining the same as opposed to the larger cities that are near them taking and destroying the suburbs (no more single housing),
  • Are for the returning of American jobs that have gone overseas,
  • Are for fair trade agreements that put America first,
  • Are for keeping America’s institutions intact,
  • Are against the lying national media,
  • Etc.

The capitalist integrationist Republicans are more correct than the very hardcore communist Democrats, but they both do not know what “Made America Great” and what will “Make America Great Again”. Did God’s blessing on the common fathers [Abraham, Isaac and Jacob] of the American settlers have anything to do with the greatness of America?

The Democrats are demo(n)cratically inspired. They are threatening Senators, small business owners and opponents of their political and religious views with physical harm, even death. Who are these Burners, Looters and Murderers? And who is paying them to come to the locations that an in an uproar of rioting? Men like the Jew Norm Ison, the Jew George Soros and the woman like the Jew Susan Rosenberg, who was paroled on the last day President Bill Clinton was in office. They also are worshippers of strange god(s)—most are billionaires and the have financed the attempt to make America a communist nation.

Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for vice-president, raised funds (contributed to by many high-level Democrats) to pay to get the rioters out of prison as fast as they were put in. That should be considered treasonous behavior.

The Republicans are a better choice to have win than the Democrats. But they aren’t the best choice either. But at least, they are advocating a couple of God’s laws being reinstated. The best choice would be a party that advocates the keeping of all of God’s holy laws. But that choice is not available to us now.

Part One of this series dealt with the sodomy question. Both parties are afraid of losing the LGBTQ+ vote and they have homosexual groups in major roles in their parties. The Democrats have the most; they have mayors, presidential candidates, senators, etc. who belong to this perverted group. The Republicans have a few, but they have them and won’t speak out against them. They are worshippers (whether they know it or not of the god Baal!)

Part Two dealt with the segregation question. America used to be a partly segregationist nation. America has gradually changed. It used to be that only white men could vote, i.e. only white men who owned property. They were the taxpayers, so only they had a right to vote on how their money was spent.

There were white and colored businesses, white and colored schools, white and colored churches, white and colored sport teams. There were even white and colored drinking fountains. There were the Jim Crow laws that each party now dismisses without a thought. They just say that these laws were harmful and embrace the civil rights advocates like Michael King, Jr., John Lewis and Ruth Bader Ginsberg. (They are worshipping another position that is what the followers of Baal hold!)

You can read and hear these sermons on our website: www.fgcp.org.

Now, we come to the third part of the series, and there will be more sermons on this subject, that both parties are not inclined to add God’s law to their programs.

I will start it off by relating a true story. The man was an alcoholic and was an atheist, made one by a religion teacher at a local college in the city where he lived. But atheism wasn’t working for him, and he had tried everything. It was 4 o’clock in the afternoon on April 28, 1965. He made an agreement with God – if there was one – that if he would let him work and help his marriage, he would try his best to believe. He gave his word. He would read three chapters a day in the Bible and four on Sunday. He also promised that he would go to church on Sunday. That promise put him on a path that most of us can relate to.

Many times, he went to a church service after drinking alcohol and didn’t see anything wrong with it. But one time when he went to church, he heard some verses that told him that certain drinks could make a person forget keeping God’s law. So, shortly thereafter, he was given a beer to drink. He drank half of it and set the can on the kitchen counter. That was the last time that he drank an alcoholic drink.

He also smoked three packs of cigarettes a day. But he heard some more verses that taught against it and he quit smoking one year after he quit drinking.

There were other changes that he made; some made his marriage a lot better. But the biggest happened when he was writing a book that argued that all the major wars in recent centuries were fought because of universal usury. He read in the Bible that the WORD made it a capital crime. The Bible said that anyone who charges usury to his brothers should be put to death!

His book had come to a standstill. Was it the correct thesis?

  1. If the Bible approved of usury – that was one thing. The book would not be published.
  2. If the Bible condemned usury – that was something else. The book would be published.

But he couldn’t seem to get a straight answer out of anyone. He did his homework and called his pastor -- Jerry Falwell. Jerry said that he would come down to the man’s office. When Jerry arrived, the man told his pastor that he believed that usury was wrong and showed him some 20 pages of reasons. Pastor Falwell told him that if he believed that usury was wrong, he should act accordingly.

The man groaned, took a big breath and stopped selling bonds. Selling bonds furnished half his income. But then two weeks later, Thomas Road Baptist Church came out with a new bond issue and sold it to its own members – which made usurers out of Thomas Road members. This was a huge problem for him.

The man thought that Jerry had told him that usury was wrong. He then went to Thomas Road Baptist Church to get this straight. Jerry was talking to someone else and asked an associate pastor to help him. The associate pastor told him that only Jews were under God’s Law. He said that if the man wanted an answer about the Law dealing with usury, the man should call the local rabbi (who, of course, was a jew!)

So, the man took a trip to the local rabbi and told him that Thomas Road Baptist Church told him to ask the rabbi to answer his question. The rabbi agreed that usury was unlawful. But could he take the rabbi’s word? Jews practice Kol Nidre.

This true story was lived by Richard Kelly Hoskins, who is now 92 years old. He continues and tells that Jerry Falwell taught that the Jews were God’s chosen people, that the rest of us were Judeo-Christians, and that both Christians and Jews believed in the Old Testament.

But shortly thereafter, when Richard Hoskin’s was speaking to Eldon Purvis’ church group in Richmond, Virginia (New Beginnings) about money and usury, he mentioned that he was a “Judeo-Christian.” There was a shocked silence and then they told him what was wrong with being a Judeo-Christian.

The “Jews”:

  • Believe in the Talmud and Kabballah;
  • Are their own Messiah;
  • Are antichrists;
  • Over 90% of the jews today are descended from the mongrel Khazar-Turks; and
  • That the rest of the “Jews” are descended from Cain, the Canaanites, and Edom.

Richard Kelly Hoskins concluded that the jews can’t be the sons-of-Jacob, or, Jacob-Israel, the keeper of the law. His life changed even more. And the usury book that he had written, “War Cycles/Peace Cycles”, was published.

I think that is quite a story. Is usury to be charged to brothers in the land of Israel? Remember the questions that he asked:

  1. If the Bible approved of usury – that was one thing.
  2. If the Bible condemned usury – that was something else.

What was the correct answer; A or B? If answer A is correct, then what is happening in the world today is alright. If B is correct, then everything is wrong. Let’s do a little investigating.

In a college math textbook, they quote the Khazarian Jew, Albert Einstein, who said,

“The most powerful force in the universe is compound interest.”

That means that it is more powerful than the atomic bomb. The evil of compound interest is concealed by calling it “interest.” The public is told that “high interest is bad and low interest is good”. Any interest of a loan is usury, whether it is compound or simple. They are both bad, but compound interest is by far the worst. Today, loans are advertised, and people have been trained not to take offense. Usury is hidden in the open for all to see.

On July 21, 2020 Alameda, California’s City Council, voted unanimously to “de-name” the park that had been known as Andrew Jackson Park for 111 years. One of the members of the public weighed in on the park’s name change during the meeting and said:

“As an Alameda High School alumnus, I have walked by or through Jackson Park thousands of times on my way to and from school,” the member said. “I have spent countless hours sitting in Jackson Park, always uneasy with the reverence and honor the park places on the racist slave trader, slaveholder and genocidal murderer that Andrew Jackson was. Jackson represents the antithesis of the values I was raised with and that I until recently believed Alameda held dear.”

Andrew Jackson owned slaves. A lot of people did in those days, even free black individuals owned slaves – both white and black slaves. There were almost 4,000 black slave owners by 1830 in America. Even Kamala Harris, the Democratic Party vice-presidential candidate is descended from black slave owners of white and black slaves in the plantations in Jamaica.

But the person who told of changing the Park name didn’t tell of one of President Jackson’s biggest problems -- The Second National Bank. The First National Bank was started in 1791 by President George Washington and Alexander Hamilton. It ran for 20 years; that would be 1811 but was failed to be re-chartered. Does someone know what happened in 1812? The United States and Britain went to War from 1812 – 1814. Was the cancellation of the Bank a reason for the War of 1812?

The Second National Bank of the United States, which was created in 1816, was chartered for 20 years – thus, is was scheduled to be re-chartered in 1836. The prime supporter of the Second National Bank was Henry Clay, who hoped to make re-chartering an issue in the coming election of 1832. Clay urged the Bank to submit an early application for Congressional renewal; the request was made in 1832, and the expiration date was not to occur until 1836. Congress passed a re-chartering measure as Clay had planned, but it was promptly vetoed by President Jackson. The bank War had begun.

President Jackson said:

“Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country. When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank. You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin! You are a den of vipers and thieves. I intend to rout you out, and by the Eternal God, I will rout you out.”

This led to an economic war. President Jackson was opposed to the Bank president – Nicholas Biddle. He was opposed as President of the United States by Henry Clay. Jackson won in a land slide and the bank was dead in 1841.

Has anyone heard either Party, Republican or Democratic, have a presidential or vice-presidential candidate say anything like President Jackson said about the Second National Bank? What if the Republican presidential candidate says that the people who run the Federal Reserve Bank are a den of vipers and thieves? Does that verbiage remind you of something that was said that is recorded in the Bible?

Matthew 21:13“And said unto them, It is written, My house shall be called the house of prayer; but ye have made it a den of thieves.”

Who was Jesus the Christ taking to? What do the pronouns them and “ye” in this verse refer to? Was it the Jews, or Muslims, the Black race, or the Asiatic, or the Caucasians, or Israel, or who?

There is a lot of things that can be said about President Jackson, both good and evil. In 1838, he became an official member of the First Presbyterian Church in Nashville, Tennessee. But President Jackson, like many other presidents, was a member of Freemasonry. Jackson was a Freemason, initiated at Harmony Lodge No. 1 in Tennessee. He was elected Grand Master of the Grand Lodge of Tennessee in 1822 and 1823.  During the 1832 presidential election, Jackson faced opposition from the Anti-Masonic Party. He was the only United States president to have served as Grand Master of a state’s Grand Lodge until Harry S. Truman in 1945. His Masonic apron is on display in the Tennessee State Museum. An obelisk and bronze Masonic plaque decorate his tomb at the Hermitage.

So, the United States eliminated its National Bank. So, what happened next? The War Between the States. Did the cancellation of the Second National Bank of the United States have anything to do with this war being fought? Or did it have to do with freeing the slaves, as both Parties say?

The South, with its independent plantations and farmlands, did not need the usury banks. This was a big problem for the usury banks. Usury used to be illegal and unlawful in Christian nations. But it has also been extremely profitable. How could usury banks flourish without much opposition? It had to have good public relations – the media would offer its protection.

THE MEDIA CONQUERS AMERICA

By 1785, much of the media of Britain were in the hands of owners who were owners in name only – who owned them for someone else. That someone else was the one who had the money. The ones who had the money by this date were the international bankers. Thus, the king, who was a debtor and slave to the banks, made press releases to a media which were creatures of the banks, and the words that reached the people in the name of the king were the selected, censored, rewritten, and approved words of the bank. The king spoke the words of his master.

Proverbs 22:7 “The rich ruleth over the poor, and the borrower is slave to the lender.”

The control of the media in America had been completed in the urban North by 1830, but it could not be done in the South where there were few large cities and only a few medium-sized ones. The people ruled in the agricultural South. Its population was scattered widely over enormous distances. Its news was satisfied by many local weeklies that reported local events – usually events of no interest to those not living in that region. The South was independent with little need for loans, let alone usury loans.

The media monopoly operating in the population centers of the North was successful beyond belief. It brought instant results. Diversity of opinion vanished overnight, replaced with slogans. Opposing opinions were neither reported nor allowed.

The media in the urban north quickly reached operating speed. Public opinion was reduced to an acceptable standard. A single media opinion replaced diversity, just as it does in today’s world. Have you seen articles, shows on television that shows Biden’s criminal ring that benefited his son, wife, brothers and friends? It is just ignored by the mainstream media. Few dared to differ. The majority who opposed the standard are totally ignored.

What happened in America in 1832? The battle between the National Bank vs. the President of the United States or Biddle vs. Jackson. Jackson won, but he did not realize that The Second National Bank was only a part of the gigantic usury apparatus which by then had spread across most of the country. Jackson crushed and humiliated Biddle, but Biddle was only a single enemy who had foolishly put himself in direct opposition to the most popular and powerful man of his age.

The important thing to note is that by the 1830s, the media of the major population centers was in the hands of the usury banks (in the North). Jackson and his successor, Martin Van Buren, were the last United States presidents to be freely elected by the people. From this time, the only ones receiving media publicity were bank approved candidates, and whoever receive publicity was elected. Whoever was denied media publicity was defeated. It was that simple.

Democratic election on the national level in the urban North became a sham. Despite multiple political parties America was being reduced to one political opinion while giving the appearance of having a republican democracy.

The assessed valuation of all United States property in 1860 was $12 billion. One-half of that was in 11 Southern States with only eight million Whites. These eight million Whites exported 57% of the total exports of the nation. The plan was to conquer the South and take her wealth.

War would be necessary since the South could not be expected to willingly give away wealth that had taken over 250 years to accumulate. Then, too, war is good for business. In fact, it is the best of several ways to force money to be borrowed into existence in a usury society.

The usual way the media goes about creating a war climate is:

  1. “The enemy” must be made to appear illegal. He must be made to appear criminal, one that must be restrained and punished for the good and safety of all.
  2. The public must be made to believe that the enemy is going to attack them. If the enemy can be made to strike the first blow, opinions harden and unite on war, and “happy days are here again” as contracts go out.

The War Between the States was a staged media event. It’s supposed issue was abolition of slavery. It cost hundreds of thousands of lives and it violated God’s Laws. Laws that demand heavy punishment. Wars between our people are forbidden.

The war wasn’t fought over slavery, it was fought to make all the southerners’ (white and black) slaves. They destroyed their farms, so they had to borrow money. They destroyed their rural way of life, so they had to go to the city and work. And the slaves weren’t really freed, they were made to be lenders to the usury banks that were soon built in the South. They went from being slaves on the plantation to slaves to the usury banks.

The South fell, and next it would be Germany, South Africa, Libya, and soon... Why don’t we believe that our LORD God told us that anyone who lends money to their brother on usury will be guilty of the death penalty?

1 Kings 12:24a:“Thus saith the LORD, Ye shall not go up, nor fight against your brethren the children of Israel: return every man to his house; for this think is from me.”

Jews are forbidden from usury in dealing with fellow jews, thus lending is to be considered charity. However, there are permissions to charge interest on loans to non-jews. As the Jews were ostracized by most professions during the Middle Ages, they were pushed into marginal occupations considered socially inferior, such as tax and rent collecting and moneylending. Christian churches who once condemned interest-taking absolutely, agreed that jews could lend to non-jews with no penalty. Usury banking had begun in Israelite lands.

CONCLUSION

The media controlled northern America several years before they defeated the South. They had done the same thing in Haiti earlier, when all the whites were killed by the black slave revolt. The 1861-1865 war in America, that was so carefully promoted, nurtured, and developed, could not be called a civil war. It was a war between a banking establishment which had conquered and gained monetary, media, and political dominance over the northeastern states and used the resources of those states (including the people) to expand their power over others. Thus, it was a “War Between the States.” It wasn’t a “civil war” but an even better name for the disastrous war would be the “Second War of Independence.”

All wars end. This one did, too. From Vicksburg to Gettysburg, to Richmond, to Petersburg practically all the soldiers from the South lay dead. Of the Army of Northern Virginia, only twenty thousand were left to surrender to 200,000 men of the Army of the Potomac. The South was one vast blackened and charred cemetery. The war was over. It ended in a whimper.

“Slaves set free” was the slogan used for the destruction and confiscation of Southern wealth accumulated over the previous 250 years in its no-interest economic system. This accumulated wealth was ripe to be harvested. The same as the wealth of the rest of the Saxon West today.

Lincoln’s wife owned slaves. Over 4000 free blacks owned black slaves. Ignored was the nationwide “Repatriation Movement” to free black slaves; females age 18, males age 20, and to teach them a trade and settle them in Liberia, Africa. Villages were built, tens of thousands returned. 

But “Repatriation” would deprive Esau’s “Trade-Cartel” of cheap black labor and potential usury-borrowers. 

Proverbs 22:7: “The borrower is SLAVE to the lender” 

It would also deprive Esau of his principal weapon against Jacob; racial interbreeding.

The invasion and conquest of the South was instigated by Lincoln’s executive-order. Lincoln was Esau’s media-elected agent. The black leader Marcus Garvey, with millions of dues--paying black followers, bought ships for his followers to return to Africa. He was imprisoned.

“Free the slaves” was propaganda Esau’s media used to destroy the Saxon South and both its land and wealth, making usury-slaves of everyone. Esau’s media-agents were fulfilling Esau’s age-old threat:

Genesis 27:41: “I will kill my brother Jacob.”

Today, Esau instigates strife to destroy Jacob and take his wealth. Esau must destroy Jacob’s law-system which is based on the 10-Commandments of their LORD God. Esau intends to replace these laws with his own law-system. Can you see the battle that is taking place right before our eyes? Abortion, integration, sodomy, same-sex marriages, feminism, public school education, usury loans, fiat money, transgendered individuals, pharmacy medicine, etc. vs. God’s laws.

After the war, America was turned into a corporation. The were two world wars against Germany and it allies, the second one was against the man who kicked the usury bank out of Germany and his name is hated to this day, war in South Africa, Russia, China, and now the United States. “We have reaped what we have sown.”

Both parties are full of Edomite or Khazarians who will pull the strings no matter which one is elected. They have controlled the media for a long time; they have controlled the political parties for a long time; they soon will control the United States…except our LORD God has made to us an unconditional promise. Israel will never be destroyed. Our LORD God will never leave us. We are the inheritors of the promise of His kingdom.

We live in a society where the acquisition of debt has become as American as apple pie. It has not always been this way. For example, in 1900 most homeowners owned their homes outright and those who had mortgages were required to pay 50% down with a 5-year payoff. It was not until after World War II that Americans began to use debt more freely as loan requirements were progressively loosened and lenders were protected by federal laws.

At the same time when mortgage debt opportunities expanded and evolved, consumer debt has skyrocketed. The severity of this can be seen when over seven out of ten Americans are just one paycheck away from financial disaster and cannot deal with a $500 emergency and that most adults have less than $1000 in savings.

The Bible does not prohibit Israelites from going into debt. It is being charged usury or interest on a loan. And there was an automatic cancellation of debts every seventh year, making it clear that debt was not a sin, but in God’s kingdom it only lasted no longer than seven years minus a day!

Why do both parties ignore these issues:

  1. Sodomy, (Baal worship)
  2. Segregation, (Baal worship) or
  3. Our huge usury debt (Baal worship).

More later:

  1. Unholy seed that control both parties (Baal worship),
  2. Haters of the God of the Bible and His people (Baal worship).

To be continued.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.