Paul's Missionary Journeys - Part 6

SECOND MISSIONARY JOURNEY (Part Three)

Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

June 8, 2025

Scripture Reading:  Acts 17:26a:

“And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, …”

According to an old and a new gallop poll which asked the following question, “Do you approve or disapprove of marriage between Black people and White people”, the results have changed drastically in the 63 years they have asked this question.

In 1958: 4% of Americans approved of interracial marriages between Blacks and Whites, while 94% disapproved.

In 2021: 94% of Americans approved of interracial marriages between Blacks and Whites, while 4% disapproved.

What happened in the last 63 years? In 1958, I was sixteen years old and a sophomore/junior in high school. I am now 82 years old, and the approval/disapproval category has completely flipped-flopped. Ninety percent more adults approve of miscegenation than before. Here is a chart which measures the increases of approval over time between 1958 and 2021.

The most common form of interracial marriage in the United States is between a White person and a Hispanic. Next most common is an Asian person married to a White, followed by Black-White couples.

Do you think what has happened to the churches in America in the last sixty years has had much influence on the decision of its members on this question?Do you think that what Christendom today believes about what the apostle Paul taught in his sermon in Athens, Greece has changed their opinion on race-mixing? Do you think that America’s churches, which used to have the most segregated time in the nation when they held their weekly Sunday service, have changed the members attitudes on this question. I believe that it has, and in this sermon I will give my opinion on what Christendom has begun to teach in the last couple of generations that is wrong which has usurped the minds of its congregations.

PAUL’S SERMON IN ATHENS

Half of one verse, as quoted at the start of this sermon, is ALL that most Christendom ever hears about the Apostle Paul’s sermon that he gave on Mars Hill in Athens. What they don’t tell their congregants is that Paul was by himself, as he had been very quickly put on a ship in Berea while the other missionaries on his journey were left behind. This happened because the Jews  had traveled from Thessalonica to Berea for the intense purpose of causing either bodily harm or death to the Apostle Paul.  Have you noticed that it is always them. Why is this?  Paul’s brethren paid the fare for him to sail to Athens, while the rest of Paul’s assistants were to meet him in Athens, but they had to travel 275 miles over land.

While Paul waited in Athens for the arrival of his fellow laborers, “his spirit was stirred” (Acts 17:16) as he saw that the city was wholly given over to idolatry. So, he began having discussions with the Judeans and other philosophers and peoples in the synagogue and marketplace. After a short time and much discussion, his listeners decided to take him to Mars Hill for a dialogue of this “new doctrine” that he was preaching about Jesus and His resurrection. 

There are only nine and one half more verses that are recorded in the Bible in his speech that lasted…who knows how long. We will look at the next two verses, after Acts 17:26, and see if these two verses agree with or are in contradiction to what Christendom says that verse twenty-six teaches. Here are the two verses that follow verse twenty-six:

27) “That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after Him and find Him, though He be not far from every one of us:

28) For in Him, we live, and move, and have our being: as certain also of your own poets have said, For we are also His offspring.”

Christendom believes that half of one verse that Paul spoke to the Athenians means that all individuals in the world (estimated at eight billion) are descended from the same source; i.e. Adam and Eve. And because they believe that is true, they say that all the races of the world are related to each other. And since they believe that “all nations of men” (Acts 17:26) are all the same race, (i.e., the human race), there is no such thing as an interracial marriage. So they conclude that  marriage between the races that is not wrong if they are both Christian.

But can a non-Adamite be a Christian? Christendom believes that anyone on the earth can be a Christian. Now seventeen percent of Americans are involved in mixed marriages and mixed marriages are rapidly increasing!

WHAT DOES ACTS 17:27, 28 TEACH?

The next two verses, verses 27 and 28 give us an indication of who Paul’s listeners were. Paul wasn’t speaking to every race of the world; He was speaking to the Athenians in Greece (Acts 17:22). There were no Orientals, Incas, Mayas, New Guinea savages, Zulus, Filipinos, Koreans, etc.  living there.

These two verses contain eight pronouns, with two of them repeated two times and one repeated three times in these two verses. 

1. “They,” used twice,
2. “Your,”
3. “Us,”
4. “We,” used twice,
5. “Our,”
6. “Him,” used three times,
7. “He,” and
8. “His.”

The easiest pronouns to translate would be the pronouns “Him,” “He,” and “His.” The noun that is replaced by these three pronouns are found in the beginning of verse twenty-seven; “the Lord.” That was easy. Now for the harder part.

WHAT DOES THE PHRASE, “FACE OF THE EARTH” MEAN?

But before we try to understand what nouns the rest of the five pronouns represent, we will first look at the phrase in verse twenty-six, “all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth.” What does this phrase mean? Most of Christendom believes that it means all nations or people who dwell on the entire planet of the earth. But is this correct?

Let us look at five of the many other places in the Bible where this phrase is given. In other words, let the Bible interpret itself.

1. Genesis 4:14a:  “Behold, thou hast driven me [Cain] out this day from the face of the earth…”  Does this mean the Cain was driven from off from the planet earth?
2. Genesis 6:1:  “And it came to pass, when men [Adamites] began to multiply on the face of the earth…”  Does this mean that the Adamites began to spread over the entire earth?
3. Genesis 7:4:  “For yet seven days, and I will cause it to rain upon the earth forty days and forty nights; and every living substance that I  [LORD God] have made will I destroy from off the face of the earth.”  Does this mean that every living substance, except those on the Ark, was destroyed in the entire earth?
4. Genesis 11:8: “So the LORD scattered them [Noah’s sons’ descendants]abroad from thence [Tower of Babel] upon the face of all the earth…”  Does this mean that all of Noah’s sons' descendants were scattered into the entire earth?  This map shows that Noah’s sons’ descendants did not go over the entire earth.
5. Exodus 10:14, 15a: “And the locusts went up over all the land of Egypt and rested in all the coasts of Egypt, very grievous were they: before them there were no such locusts as they, neither after them shall be such. 15a) For they covered the face of the whole earth…”  Does this mean that the locusts covered the entire earth?

Does Genesis 4:14 say that God drove Cain from off the planet of the earth? No, for that would make no sense and besides, Cain stayed on the earth (per Genesis 4:14). So, there is no doubt that the interpretation of this verse is wrong from the way that it is translated. Both sides agree that this is the wrong interpretation of this verse.

Look at how over a half of the Bible translations translate this verse, including the New King James Bible:

Genesis 4:14:  “Surely You [LORD God]have driven me [Cain] out this day from the face of the ground[or soil]; I shall be hidden from Your face; I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond on the earth, and it will happen that anyone who finds me will kill me.”

Cain was originally a farmer. For his punishment, God told him that his farming days would no longer be successful. Therefore, Cain’s descendants today are not farmers.  They own pawnshops, jewelry stores, furniture and luggage stores, restaurants, movie production studios, are in politics, and oversee money-lending usury institutions, etc.

The commentators corrected their interpretation of the phrase in Genesis 4:14 and they should also correct the phrase in other places too, as this wrong interpretation of this translation has misled a lot of Christians. 

So, what is the meaning of “face of the earth” in Acts 17:26? Same as the ones in the verses given above.

Acts 17:26a:  “And hath made of one blood all nations of men [Adamites] to dwell on the land that God gave to His people…”

WHAT DO THE OTHER PRONOUNS MEAN?

Who was the apostle Paul addressing in his sermon in the city of Athens? 

First, who do the pronouns “they” and “your” represent?  I believe that these two pronouns in verses 27 and 28, represent “all nations of men” state in verse 26. 

There is no disagreement with who these two pronouns represent. Both sides agree that it is “all nations of men,” who were the descendants of the three sons of Noah in Genesis 10:

(1) Japheth 

(2) Shem, and 

(3) Ham.

The disagreement is who the sons of Noah represent.

• Christendom says that the eight individuals of the family of Noah were the only individuals who were on the entire earth in 2200 BC. And these eight individuals had a skin tone that was probably mid-brown, and they were one race. They say that from these three sons of Noah (Shem, Ham, and Japheth) and their wives were to come all the nations of the world.  Somehow the different races all came from this one race.  Therefore, all the individuals of the world are of the same race; they are all equal. So, Christendom concludes, there is no such thing as an interracial marriage.

• While we say that Noah and his wife and his three sons and their wives were the only White people on the earth. But there were many other races, as well as empires, who survived Noah’s flood and were living on all the different continents of the world where the deadly flood did not occur. But the flood was a very unusual storm. For after the flood, the life span of the descendants of Adam began to lower to eventually one tenth of the pre-flood days.

  The flood annihilated all the White race except for Noah’s family. Only the White people are the descendants of Noah’s sons. One of the descendants of Shem (Abram) was chosen by God to make an everlasting covenant with, and the covenant would extend also with one of his sons (Isaac), and one of his grandsons (Jacob/Israel) and his seed. 

  These people were called by God to be a special people unto Himself. They were to be separated from all the other races; therefore, interracial marriages are very wrong.

That is a big difference: eight people or millions of people/individuals. One race or many races. Eight people alone in the world, or eight White people left in the world with a host of other races dwelling throughout the world. A worldwide flood or a flood that was only in a certain part of the earth. Interracial marriages are okay vs. interracial marriages are sinful. Both statements about what happened can’t be correct.

WHAT ABOUT THE EMPIRES?

But if you only have eight people in all the world4300 years ago (2300 BC), when the worldwide flood started, that will mean that there were no other people on the entire earth. But if you look at history books, or if you plug in, for example, “Norte Chico Empire,” on google.com, you will find that the Norte Chico Empire, the oldest empire of the Americas, that began around 5000 years ago, (about 3,000 BC), there is no mention of them all drowning 700 years later when Noah’s flood occurred. It preceded the Mayas and Incas and was in modern-day Peru. They were located on the other side of the world. Its empire ended in 1800 BC. See the location of this empire on the map below.

• The Egyptian Empire began around 5150 years ago (about 3150 BC) or about 850 years before Noah’s flood (2300 BC). But there is no mention of all of them drowning in Noah’s flood either. In fact, history just says that they continued with no break. The Empire ended in 30 BC.
• Then there was the Indus Valley Empire that began about 4550 years ago, (about 2550 BC), in modern-day Pakistan, about 150 years before Noah’s flood that Christendom says drowned everyone in the world. It ended in 1550 BC.
• The AkkadianEmpire ruled Mesopotamia between the years 4300 to 4100 years ago (from about 2300 to 2100 BC).They say that it began when Noah’s Flood began.

Which view is right? Christendom can argue that the dates are wrong, but they must come up with another reason to explain how there could be all these Empires ruled by different races in different parts of the world if there were only eight people of the same race in Iraq. That’s a huge problem for them to answer.

Let’s continue.

WHO DO “THEY” AND “YOUR” REPRESENT

The “they” and “your” pronouns would represent the Athenians during Paul’s visit who were descended from Javan, the son of Japheth, the son of Noah.  These were Adamic people who settled around ancient Achaia, or modern-day southern Greece. Look at the map below.

Map showing where the descendants of Noah’s three sons migrated after the Tower of Babel

Christendom doesn’t mention very often that many of the Athenians were descended from Javan, the son of Japheth, yet they would agree that this was true. But they would not say that they were White, yet they would agree that they were in southern Greece. But before they migrated to Greece, they were at the building of the Tower of Babel. All the descendants of Noah, one hundred years after the flood of Noah had subsided and were building the Tower, which was located at Babel, in modern-day Iraq (2200 BC).

All the people at the Tower of Babel were dispersed into other lands on the earth because the LORD God had changed their one language into many others. And the people who spoke the same “new” language gathered together and went to their own separate lands. 

Notice, Christendom remains silent and does not mention that they believe that there were no Chinese, Japanese, Indians, New Guinea or other savages or Australian or American Aborgines, Peruvians, Negroes, Caucasians, Pacific Islanders, Koreans, Kenites, or Whites, etc. who existed on the earth at this time. And so, most of their congregants don’t even think about this issue. They only believe that there were just eight mid-brown people of Noah’s family alive 4200 years ago, with the continents of Asia, most of Europe and Africa, North, Central and South America, Australia, New Zealand being empty of any empires, countries, or populace.

But how did the Norte Chico Empire in South America occur at the same time if there were only eight people located on the other side of the earth?  Don't you think that this is a big contradiction? 

We say that the Bible is the story of only Israel and its genetic enemy. The fact that it does not mention the other nations, does not mean that they did not exist, but that they did not have any thing to do with what happened to Israel.

THE LAST THREE PRONOUNS

The rest of the inhabitants of Athens were mainly from three groups. These three groups are very seldom, if ever, discussed in Christendom today.

Two of the groups were Israelites. The “us,” “we,” and “our,” were of this group. They were descendants of Shem, one of the three sons of Noah. They are identified as being the same as Paul’s heritage... Israelites (per Romans 11:1). 

There were Judeans of the house of Judah who had migrated to Syria, Asia Minor, Greece and Italy from the time Zerah, one of the five sons of Judah, and his family left Egypt when Joseph was second in command. Many others migrated throughout Israel’s history in the centuries when they lived in the promised land and others migrated from the countries which had captured them and made them slaves.

The other group of Israelites were the dispersed, divorced, former house of Israel. They migrated for over 700 years, about the same distance that Javan did to get to Greece as well as other European territories. They migrated to all parts of Europe from the Assyrian Empire and from other nations that had conquered them in their disobedient past.

In the Apocrypha (2 Esdras 13:40-48) we are told how some of the Ten Tribes escaped from Assyrian control via the upper Euphrates valleys. Later they became notorious in Asia Minor when they overthrew King Midas of Phrygia.

After the fall of the Assyrian capital Nineveh in 612 BC, the main body of Scythian Israelites came under such pressure from the Medes that they were forced northwards through the Caucasus mountains and into the steppe region of Russia.

As wave after wave of these people were forced through the Caucasus Mountains, the leaders in the west crossed the rivers Don and Dnieper and met the Cimmerian Israel groups who had earlier moved across the Black Sea, thus pushing them westward along the valley of the Danube into Central Europe.

There was a fourth group of people who were in Athens who were the product of interracial marriages – they are known as mongrels. They were offspring of some of the descendants of Japheth, Shem, or Ham, who had had sexual relations with the descendants of Cain, Canaan, and/or Esau and had offspring.  Of course, Christendom denies this as they do not believe in such a thing as interracial marriages.

In addition, the Hittites (another Canaanite nation) had a major empire in Asia Minor and Syria from 1400 – 1200 BC. There were many of their descendants in Asia Minor when Paul made his missionary journeys there. Others Kenites/Canaanites/Edomites were race mixed with other non-Adamic nations as well. They are known today as being Jews. What a group!

But today, America is a whole lot worse than our forefathers were, as it is extremely proud of the fact that their country is the “melting pot” of the entire world. It has practically every race in the world, including over 20 million illegal immigrants now dwelling in our country.

There is no mention of any descendants of Ham, the third son of Noah, being in Athens at the time that Paul was there. Ham settled in Egypt and other places in Africa and the middle east. There could have been a few Hamites who were there but there wasn’t enough, if any, to be significant. 

To review, there were four main groups of men/individuals that Paul addressed in Athens:

(1) Men from Javan, of Japheth(Adamites),

(2) Men from Shem, Judeans, from the House of Judah (Adamites),

(3) Another group of men from Shem, who were from the former House of Israel (Adamites), and

(4) Individuals or Mongrels, offspring of different interracial groups (non-Adamites).

There were very few or no Orientals, Negroes, Filipinos, Indians, Eskimos, etc., who Paul addressed.

The Hebrew or Israelite people as well as the Adamic people were White, which can be demonstrated from Scripture. For example:

1 Samuel 17:42:  “And when the Philistine [Goliath, heroic giant from the nation of the Philistines] looked about, and saw David [descendant of the tribe of Judah and Shem, the son of Noah, and eventually to the son of Adam], he [Goliath] disdained him [David]: for he [David] was but a youth, and ruddy [having a fresh, healthy red complexion in the face], and of a fair [White] countenance.”

Were the sons of Noah the White race or were they, as Christendom says, mid-brown? Christogenea.com presents some other arguments that Christendom has either ignored or have never heard, or if they did, they have seldom or never answered.

Christogenea.com says:

“Deuteronomy 32:8 can only be referring to Genesis chapter 11 and the Tower of Babel event which separated only those descendants of Noah, the White nations listed in Genesis chapter 10.”

 Let’s look at what Deuteronomy 32:8 says with my comments in brackets:

Deuteronomy 32:8:

“When the Most High divided to the nations [What nations are these? Are these all the nations of the world or just the Adamic (sons of Noah) nations (or White nations) of Genesis 10?] their inheritance [did all the races of the world get an inheritance from Almighty God? No, they did not.], when He separated the sons of Adam [when were they separated?], He set the bounds of the people [who are these people?] according to the number of the children of Israel [this is the descendants of Jacob/Israel, which is part of the sons of Adam.]”

This verse says that God separated and dispersed the Adamic nations from the Tower of Babel and later kept them separate from the children of Israel. It is silent on all the other nations/races of the world since they were dwelling far away from Israel.

Christogenia.com continues:

“Yet the appointing of the times ordained for these [Adamic] nations can only be seen in the books of the prophets, and especially in the prophet Daniel, who prophesied the rise and fall of great empires built upon the Genesis 10 nations. In Daniel chapter 2, the prophet interprets a dream for Nebuchadnezzar and tells him that he shall rule over the earth,

‘[And] wheresoever the children of men dwell…’[Daniel 2:38a].

The Babylonians indeed held sway over the entire Adamic world of the time, but they never ruled over the non-White races. The non-White races are not at all considered in the Biblical context as the ‘children of men.’”

Daniel is interpreting Nebuchadnezzar’s dream. He tells him that the first kingdom that he saw in his vision was Nebuchadnezzar’s own – 

1. Babylon. Followed by,
2. Media-Persia, then
3. Greece, then
4. Rome.

These empires ruled over many of the White nations of their time when it says that they“…shall bear rule over all the earth” (Daniel 2:39).

But none of these four empires (Babylon, Media-Persia, Greece, or Rome) ruled over all the earth. They ruled only over a majority of the White nations. None of these empires ruled over the sub-Saharan Negroes, Chinamen, Japanese, Koreans, Indonesians, Incas, Mayas, or Australian or American aboriginals. Therefore, these alien peoples cannot be imagined to be a part of the “children of men” and “all the earth.”

Back to christogenea.com:

“Daniel chapter 4 records a pronouncement of Nebuchadnezzar thusly: 

‘Nebuchadnezzar theking, unto all people, nations, and languages, that dwell in all the earth; Peace be multiplied unto you’[Daniel 4:1].

Yet no non-White races were the recipients of that pronouncement.

Likewise, Luke wrote, as the King James Version has it, 

‘…that there went out a decree from Caesar Augustus, that all the world should be taxed’(Luke 2:1[b]).

Yet no non-White alien nations were ever under Roman rule, except that there were a number of mongrel Canaanite and Arab peoples on the fringes of the world at this time, and the Canaanites had infiltrated many cities. 

However, the blacks of Africa, the browns and yellows of the Orient, the browns and reds of the Americas, they are all outside of the Biblical context, and none of them ever belong in it, unless they are a scourge or a punishment. Paul’s reference to ‘every nation of men’ [Acts 17:26] cannot be taken outside of the same Biblical context to which Paul himself is referring. The phrase ‘every nation of men’ [‘all nations of men’, KJV] can only refer to the ‘sons of Adam’ of Deuteronomy 32:8 and Genesis chapter 10.”

The “all nations of men”in Acts 17:26, is identicalto the “sons of Adam,”in Deuteronomy 32:8 and “sons of Noah” Genesis 10:32.We believe that this was just the White race as they were all descended from the three sons of Noah.

JOHN GILL’S VIEW

But Christendom has a totally different perspective on these verses. Answers in Genesis, quotes John Gill, who gives an opposite explanation of the meaning of Acts 17:26 in their book, One Race, One Blood, Chapter 6, One Flesh, Ken Ham.  My comments are in brackets.

“As John Gill [who was a hyper-Calvinist preacher in England in the 1700’s] makes clear in his classic commentary, the context is that God is in charge of all things — where, how, and for how long any person, tribe, or nation will live, prosper, and perish. To conclude that this passage forbids marriage between people groups [races] is absurd. It says no such thing. When Christians legalistically impose non-biblical ideas such as no ‘interracial’ marriage, they are helping to perpetuate prejudices that have often arisen from evolutionary influences. If we are really honest, in countries like America, the main reason some Christians forbid ‘interracial’ marriage is not scriptural. They forbid ‘interracial marriage’ because of preconceived prejudices.”

Well, tell that to Ezra who wept and tore his clothes and pulled his beard when he learned that the Israelites were repeating this self-destroying sin in Jerusalem. And what does Judges, chapter three mean, when it says that the Israelites gave their daughters and sons to the Canaanites and forsook the LORD their God and served Baalim?

This should be a very important topic in every Christian church today. For most of Christendom is telling its members that it is okay to marry individuals of other races and that God approves their marriages, when less than a century ago, it was just the opposite. Who is right, therefore, is very important.

It is a fact that it was illegal in sixteen of the states in the United States to commit miscegenation until the Supreme Court ruled that race mixing was no longer illegal in 1967. That law was in existence for 191 years verses until the last 58 years when it was reversed! So, what Christendom is now teaching would be against the law in those states in America more than 58 years ago!

But if miscegenation goes on for very long, the world will become like it was in the days of Noah. There will be none of God’s people who are left, for there will be nothing but mongrels on the earth.

So, what does the Bible say about this situation? Does it teach that a person can marry any person who says they are Christian, even a Messianic Jew? Are all races related to each other? 

QUESTIONS ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF INTERRACIAL MARRIAGES

A.  What race were Noah and his wife and his three sons and their wives?

No matter what their race was, to have all the different races in the world today, Answers in Genesis would have to believe in what they say they are fighting against – evolution. They say, because they don’t know for sure, that Adam and Eve, and Noah and his three sons and wives, were probably mid-brown in color.

Think about this for a minute. How do we have all the different races in the world if there are only eight people of the same race (mid brown) about 4200 years ago.  No Orientals, Negroes, Pacific Islanders, Aboriginals, Whites, Hispanics, etc. were in existence at this time. That’s what Christendom believes.  Is this truth or heresy?

A summary of what they teach is that there was only one race until this one race was all scattered at the tower of Babel by the changing of their languages. Groups of people were formed when they traveled with other people who were speaking the same language as they were. The people who went close to the equator changed to Black individuals because their skin became sun-burnt; the people who went to Scandinavia became white because it was cold, the people who went to Asia became yellow, because…I don’t know what they say.

Others say that the sons of Noah and their wives had special genetics that gave them the opportunity to produce sixteen different skin tones as their children. It was a quick evolution that lasted for a short time (maybe for one hundred years). Then it stopped. But what was the purpose of this quick evolution? Why were there difference races if it didn’t mean anything? But how could you get a pure race out of a different race? What was the purpose of the different races? Skin color is only one of many differences between the races!

You can’t marry “kind after kind” and get a different pure race. And you can’t marry “kind” after “unkind” and get another pure race either – you get a mongrel. 

If the three sons and their wives of Noah had something special that no one else in the world has ever had, there is no scriptural reference that this is true. It is only an assumption made by Christendom that the world could have many races when there was only one race to begin with.

B.  When were there dinosaurs on the earth?

Were the dinosaurs on the earth many millenniums before Adam was created or did, they live at the same time Adam lived? Answers in Genesis says that it is the latter. But there is no reference of dinosaurs being in any of the Bible stories.

And have you ever considered that if the flood was worldwide, all the land animals would have drowned too, except for the ones on the Ark. All the animals would have been in modern-day Iraq. There would have been no land animals anyplace else. No people, no animals anywhere in the world except for the two or seven pairs of animals who survived on the Ark and the family of Noah.

It would have been chaotic when they left the Ark…for where would they have gone? There would be no food available because the ground was covered with flood water (salt) for over a year. Nothing was seeded. There would be no harvest for many years, or decades, or maybe even centuries. There were no fruit trees, etc. And there would be no insects either, except for the ones on the Ark. Why wouldn’t all the animals die of starvation, as well as all the people? It would take another miracle by God to have all the water subside very quickly and the ground to dry up and the seeds to produce in a very fast manner; it would take another recreation. God could do this, but the Bible omits this very dramatic, world changing miracle.

C. Everyone in the world is not descended from these three sons of Noah because there were many races that did not drown in the flood of Noah.

The Bible (Genesis 13-15) mentions several groups of giants, primarily in association with the pre- and post-Flood periods. These include Nephilim, Anakim, Rephaim, Emim, Zuzim as well as the Kenites (descendants of Cain), all of which lived both before and after Noah’s flood.

The purpose of Noah’s flood was to punish God’s people, the Adamic man for disobeying His law, and not the Nephilim or the other races. The Nephilim, Kenites, and other races survived the flood because they were in a land other than the land where the flood occurred. 

The Bible is about the history of the children of Israel and its genetic enemy. The other races are seldom, if ever mentioned in Scripture. So, if they are not mentioned surviving the flood, it doesn’t mean that they didn’t. This would include the rest of all the other races of the world including the Norte Chico Empire in modern-day Peru.

What is critical is what Christendom believes today and is teaching its members. That is that the genetic enemy of God was eliminated in the worldwide flood of Noah. They teach that all the people of the earth drowned in the worldwide flood of Noah, except the eight people of Noah’s family. They don’t mention it out loud, but they are saying that the descendants of Cain all drowned in the flood. This presents several unsolvable problems to Christendom.

UNSOLVABLE PROBLEMS FOR CHRISTENDOM

1. If all the descendants of Cain were drowned in Noah’s flood, that would eliminate the “evil” seed of Cain. It wouldn’t matter who Cain’s father was, whether it was the fallen angel, Adam, or pre-Adamic individuals, etc. All his descendants would be dead, and their “enmity” could no longer be used against the LORD in these last 4300 years.
2. All the curses given to Cain, who could no longer be a farmer, would now be meaningless, because Cain and all his descendants would have drowned.
3. What would the meaning be of what Jesus said to the Edomite/Jews when he told them that their ancient founding father was the murderer from the beginning if the descendants of Cain were all destroyed in Noah’s flood? For the murderer of Abel would have no descendants on the earth for 2300 years when this parable was said.
4. The parable of Wheat and the Tares says that both the wheat and the tares would be in existence until the end of this age. But who are the “tares” if all of Cain’s descendants had drown in Noah’s flood? What was the purpose of telling the parable if half of the individuals were no longer in existence?
5. If there is no “evil” seed now, Christianity has no genetic enemy. And that is what Christendom says today that all races are brothers. No one is the genetic enemy of anyone else.
6. Would all our forefathers in Europe have been wrong when they kicked the Jews out of their lands and burnt their Talmud? The Talmud is the Jewish “holy book” that says that Mary, Jesus’ mother, was a prostitute, who married a non-Israelite (non-Jewish)Roman soldier; that Jesus was not divine, He was a bastard, who blasphemed the Jews and their god, and is now in hell, boiling in a cauldron of excrement.
7. If everyone on the earth drowned in Noah’s flood, except for one family, that would mean that all the races that exist now are related to each other.
8. If all the races of the earth are related to each other, then that would mean that there is only one race.
9. If there is only one race, there is no such thing as an interracial marriage.
10. Thus, anyone can marry anyone of any race, and it is approved of by God, if they both are Christians. But would it be okay for a Christian to marry a “Christian” Messianic Jew?

11. But if there was only one race since the Tower of Babel, and every individual can marry any other individual on the earth…what about God’s forbidding His covenant people (Israel) to marry the Canaanites?

    That occurred after the Tower of Babel? As did God’s forbidding marriages with the Moabites, the Ammonites, the Edomites, the Philistines, the Hittites, Girgashites, Nubians, Arabs, Orientals, and all other foreigners. Christendom is saying that there were practically none of these people who were believers in the Old Testament, but now all of them could be believers.

12. Were the following wrong? Martin Luther, Henry Ford, King Louis IX, James Traficant, Gerald L. K. Smith, Adolph Hitler, Charles Coughlin, Gerald Winrod, and Pastors Everett Ramsey, Dan Gayman, Charles Jennings, Bill Finck, Mark Downey, Lawrence Blanchard, Jim Jester, Jerry Wickey, Walter Giddings, Brian Jones, etc. who exposed God’s genetic enemy. 

And what about what Christendom says about there being only one language older than 4200 years? 

Christendom believes that there was just one race and one language on the earth a century after the flood (2200 BC). They were all living in Babylon (modern-day Iraq) at the Tower of Babel. If this is true, then who was living in Asia? Africa? Europe? North America? Central America? South America? Australia? Christendom answers, “No one.”

The earth was completely barren of any other race. All the people of the world were of one race in just one city in Iraq speaking one language. This is pure nonsense! What language did the Norte Chico Empire (in South America) speak, for example?

And, if what Christendom believes is true, then everyone on the earth all belongs to one family; then everyone on the earth are brothers. 

Jesus spoke some parables that reveal things that have been kept secret from the foundation of the world (Matthew 13:35). One of these is the “parable of the wheat and the tares.” Both the “wheat and the tares” are in existence till the end of the age. But Christendom teaches that there were only eight people in the same family who survived the flood. There were no “tares”. They all had drowned in Noah’s flood.

That is one of the most dangerous consequences of this false doctrine. They have eliminated Christianity’s greatest enemy, who at one time in the past was excluded from Israelite society, but now they are ruling over every Israelite nation. 

King Louis IX of France rounded up all copies of the Talmud (Jewish “holy book”) in France (24 cartloads or roughly 12,000 manuscript copies of the Talmud and other Jewish books) and had them all burned (June 1242 AD). Then later, all the Jews in France were told that they had to leave their nation (1306 AD). They had previously been banished from England for 370 years, beginning in 1290 AD.  Were France and England correct when they did this?

Christendom today says that Cain and his descendants all drown in Noah’s Flood 4300 years ago. So, none of the Canaanites married any of the Kenites’ sons or daughters, because there were no Kenites for them to marry. So, why were the Canaanites so evil that God told His people to commit genocide against them and to have nothing to do with them? If they had the same ancestors as everyone else, why were they so different? Why was Canaan so different from his brothers: Cush, Mizraim, and Phut?

So, who then does Christendom say the Jews are descended from? It must be, according to their theology, either Shem, Japheth, or Ham or a combination of them. It can’t be the Kenites because they say they were eliminated in Noah’s flood. So, what happened in the Garden doesn’t matter any longer since no one on earth today is descended from any people who lived in the Garden except for eight people in one family.

Cain has no meaning in today’s world if all of his lineage died off in the flood. God put enmity between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman (Genesis 3:15)because of the sins that took place in the Garden. One of the consequences of these sins produced two main racial lines that would cause hate, conflict, and war in the world until one of the two seed lines were taken away. 

But Christendom has said that the war ended in a little over 1600 years when the seed of the serpent all drown in the flood. They say that everyone who is alive today (over eight billion) is from the same parents, Adam and Eve. 

We say that Cain and his seed could never be believers, because they were not God’s sheep. Cain’s descendants survived the flood and Canaan intermarried with them. Canaan then could not be a believer, because they were not His sheep. Then the Edomites intermarried into the Canaanites, then they could never be a believer, because they were not His sheep.

Do you believe what Christendom says?

The Bible’s account of the events at Babel confirms that all people are descended from the groups split at Babel (who were all direct, recent descendants of Noah and, consequently, from the first humans—Adam and Eve—who were special, direct creations of God). There is no basis for racism as all people are related and comprise only one “race” of people made in the image of God. Therefore, they are all equal and all equally human. There are no individuals on the earth who do not have the opportunity to be saved. Christendom has nullified the belief in the past that the Edomite Jews are descendants of at least a part of the Kenites (descendants of Cain). 

Or do you believe what we teach?

The nations that split at the Tower of Babel were the White nations who were descended from Noah’s three sons and wives, and thus, Adam and Eve. All other individuals on the earth (that is the majority) are not descended from Adam and Eve or Noah’s three sons. Therefore, all races do not have the same ancient mother and father.

God chose one group of people, Abraham, one of his sons, Isaac, and one of his grandsons, Jacob, from one of the sons of Noah, Shem, and made an everlasting covenant with them. They soon became a nation, and God became their husband and King (Why was God the husband and king over just the nation of Israel?). 

He made the promise that His special covenant people would never be destroyed but would suffer divine punishment if they disobeyed Him. These people were the “apple of His eye” and were to become and remain separate from all the other races of the world. Do you think that they kept this law, or do you think that they are embracing the “melting pot” of the world?

Deuteronomy 7:6:

“For thou art an holy people unto the LORD thy God: the LORD thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto Himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth.”

To be continued.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.