What Gospel Is Important? - Part 1

Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

November 9, 2025

Scripture Reading: 2 Corinthians 11:4

4) “For if he that cometh preacheth another Jesus, whom we have not preached, or if ye receive another spirit, which ye have not received, or another gospel, which ye have not accepted, ye might well bear with him.”

The pronouns in this verse represent the following nouns:

1.  The pronouns “he” and “him”: False preacher(s) that come(s) to the church of Corinth and preaches another Jesus, brings another spirit, or preaches another gospel.
2. The pronoun “we”: Apostle Paul and his associates who preached to the church of Corinth the correct, acceptable gospel to both houses of Israel – Judah and Israel.
3. The pronoun “ye”: Members of the church of Corinth, what will you do when a false preacher(s) of another Jesus, spirit, or gospel, appears?

What gospel was preached by Jesus and His apostles and disciples? Were there different gospels preached when the church began? Did they preach the Calvinistic gospel, or the Arminian gospel, or the gospel of the kingdom? There wasn’t any Calvinistic or Arminian gospel when the church began; these gospels came many years later (around the 1500s). Calvinism came first followed by the Arminian which was a rebuttal of Calvinism by Dutch Reformed theologian in the late 16th century, Arminius. But does it make any difference today which one is preached?

It doesn’t seem to matter in Christendom what gospel is preached, except for the third one in the list above, for practically all Christians are convinced that that gospel is heresy. Almost all Christians are in churches that preach not only different gospels than was preached by Jesus’ apostles but teach many different views on a myriad of different topics. Many members just go from one church to another with little or no consequences. Most Arminian churches accept people who have been “saved” under a Calvinistic gospel and vice versa. 

If that is true, then what does 2 Corinthians 11:4 and Galatians 1:8 mean? The Apostle Paul’s letter to the church at Corinth warned them that they might experience a man and at the church at Galatia, an angel, who would come to them preaching another Jesus, asking them to receive another spirit, and another gospel which they had not received from Paul and his associates. 

So, it did matter what gospel was preached when the church had its beginning. They were told that the gospel which was preached in their church by the apostles and disciples of Christ was very important. Any variation from it was considered heresy. So, why isn’t it important today?

The Apostle Paul gave the Corinthians (the Israelite Greeks) the same advice that he gave to the Galatians (the Israelite Turks), for in Galatians chapter 1, which was written a few years prior to the Corinthian epistle, the apostle said:

Galatians 1:8:

8) “But though we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel unto you than that which we have preached unto you, let him be accursed.”

Paul is telling them that any preacher of another gospel is to be accursed, even if it was them who had regressed from the gospel that they had originally preached. And who would be the angel from heaven that would preach in their church? Doesn’t this reflect the seriousness with which the early church viewed the integrity of the gospel message? The message is greater than the messenger. No one has the authority to alter the gospel. If one does, he is to be accursed.

To be cursed is a strong denunciation, indicating the severity of changing the gospel message. Paul’s use of such strong language reflects the seriousness of the offense and the potential spiritual harm caused by false teachings. The phrase serves as a warning, not just to the Galatians, but to all future believers about the dangers of distorting the gospel.

But only one gospel can be correct. The “good news” that is preached the most today is the Arminian gospel; the next most common is the Calvinistic gospel; and then lastly, is the very seldom preached, “gospel of the kingdom.”

The Arminian gospel says that man is sovereign, while the Calvinistic gospel says that Almighty God is sovereign. The former says that man chooses to be saved, while the latter says that God chooses the ones who are to be saved. These two uncompromising points should have Christians screaming that one of these gospels are terribly wrong. Or maybe both are wrong. But they both can’t be correct, for there is no agreement between the two.

Practically all the churches in America beginning (in the 1600s and early 1700s) preached a Calvinistic gospel. It stayed that way until the First Great Awakening which occurred during the years between 1725-1750 (a few years before America’s Revolutionary War). The movement was a response to a perceived spiritual decline and the rise of rationalist ideas from the Enlightenment era. The Enlightenment period produced five main ideas:

1. Opposition to absolute monarchy. No ruler should have unlimited power.
2. Separation of powers. Power should be distributed across different branches of government.
3. Liberty and individual rights. All men possess natural rights to life, liberty, and property.
4. Equality. All men are created equal, and no one should be born into power than another.
5. Free-market capitalism. Governments should allow markets to operate with minimal regulations.

Political and intellectual leaders in Britain’s thirteen American colonies used Enlightenment values to justify their Declaration of Independence in 1776. Following the American Revolution, those Enlightenment principles—including liberty, equality, and individual rights (Fraternity in the French Revolution)—became enshrined in the United States Constitution, even though many rights were initially reserved mostly for landowning and tax paying white men. 

Who were some of the famous people in the Enlightenment or Age of Reason who were influential forces who advocated new ideas based on reason in the American and French revolutions:

• John Locke
• Voltaire
• Jean-Jacques Rousseau
• Benjamin Franklin
• Adam Smith
• Thomas Jefferson
• Thomas Paine
• James Madison, and
• John Adams

In the battle against the Enlightenment era, notable leaders in this evangelical revival included George Whitefield, John and Charles Wesley (writer of over 6500 hymns), and Jonathan Edwards, who led large outdoor preaching tours and wrote influential theological works. The First Great Awakening promoted a more personal and emotional form of Christianity, emphasizing an individual spiritual experience over formal church doctrine. The movement fostered a shared religious and cultural experience across the diverse colonies and influenced later social and political thought. 

While the Evangelical Revival united evangelicals across various denominations around shared beliefs, it also led to division in existing churches between those who supported the revivals and those who did not. Opponents accused the revivals of fostering disorder and fanaticism within the churches by allowing the uneducated to be itinerant preachers and encouraged religious enthusiasm. 

In England, many evangelicals in the Church of England became newly formed Methodists from the ministries of Whitefield and the Wesley brothers (John and Charles). In the American colonies, the Awakening caused the Congregational and Presbyterian churches to split, while strengthening both the Methodist and Baptist denominations. It had little immediate impact on most Lutherans, Quakers, and non-Protestants, but later gave rise to a schism among Quakers that persists to this day. 

Evangelical preachers of the First Great Awakening, “sought to include every person in conversion, regardless of gender, race, and status” (Taylor, Alan, 2001, American Colonies: The Settling of North America, page 354.) 

Evangelicals considered the “new birth” to be a bond of fellowship that transcended disagreements on fine points of doctrine, allowing Anglicans, Congregationalists, and Presbyterians, and others to cooperate across denominational lines. The emphasis of the “new birth” didn’t arrive in Christendom until the First Great Awakening.

Throughout the North American colonies, especially in the South, the revival movement increased the number of African slaves and free blacks who were exposed to (and subsequently converted to) Christianity, “Slavery and African American Religion Encycolpeia.com”. It also inspired the founding of new foreign missionary societies, such as the Baptist Missionary Society in 1792.

Around this time, the 13 colonies were religiously divided. Most of:

1. New England belonged to congregational churches.
2. The Middle colonies were made up of Quakers, Anglicans, Lutherans, Baptists, Presbyterians, the Dutch Reformed and Congregational followers.
3. Southern colonies were mostly members of the Anglican Church, but there were also many Baptists, Presbyterians and Quakers.

The First Great Awakening, followed by the other Great Awakenings, put the Christian intellect on the back burner. It didn’t matter to most of the masses who attended these Awakening meetings: 

• What happened in the Garden,
• Who descended from whom,
• Who were all the races descendants of: was it Adam and Eve, and
• Who was guilty of the murder of Jesus?

One of the results of the First Great Awakening was to get everyone, of every race, to be saved.

THE BATTLE BETWEEN RELIGIOUS REVIVALS AND THE ENLIGHTENMENT ERA

Religious revivals began in Europe during the late seventeenth century in response to the beginning of the Enlightenment era. Spreading to the colonies, the movement also challenged the formality of Congregational churches and the abuse of power and control that was used by monarchs to retain their authority as well. 

The First Great Awakening brought various philosophies, ideas and doctrines to the forefront of the Christian faith. Some of the major themes of the First Great Awakening included:

• All people of all races are born sinners,
• Sin, without any acceptance for the payment for that sin by the individual of all races, will decide whether that individual will be going to hell.
• All people can be saved only if they confess their sins to God, seek forgiveness and accept God’s grace,
• Promoted women to be more active and take leadership in the church,
• All people can have a direct and emotional connection with God, and
• Religion shouldn’t be formal and institutionalized, but rather casual and personal.

OLD LIGHTS VS. NEW LIGHTS

Not everyone embraced the ideas of the First Great Awakening. One of the leading voices of opposition was Charles Chauncy, a Congregational minister in Boston. Chauncy was especially critical of Whitefield’s preaching and instead supported a more traditional, formal style of religion.

By about 1742, debate over the Great Awakening had split the New England clergy and many colonists into two groups. Preachers and followers who adopted the new ideas brought forth by the Great Awakening became known as “new lights.” Those who embraced the old-fashioned, traditional church ways were called “old lights.”

The First Great Awakening altered the religious practices of the general population by taking away from them a repeated ritual to foster a more personal experience. The idea was to hold you more accountable for the efforts you put into your faith. It fostered a deeper spiritual connection between the average person and their faith. Several preachers were involved in spreading this new approach to religion; they had a great impact on many, this included not only those immigrants originally from Europe, but also the Native Americans (Indians), freed blacks, and black slaves. A great number of the population converted to this new form of Christianity by joining the revivalist movement.

Pastor Charles Chauncy was a strong force opposing the First Great Awakening and was frequently there to combat the concept revivalists who were attempting to spread it in New England. The revivalists’ growing presence in New England, especially George Whitefield, was the reason why he became so outspoken on the topic. He believed that their concepts promoted religious enthusiasm.

 Religious enthusiasm is a fervent and passionate commitment to one’s faith, characterized by emotional expression, heightened zeal for religious practices, and a desire for spiritual renewal. This was a key feature of the Great Awakenings that occurred in America. 

This new gospel contributed to the creation of new religious movements and denominations as people sought to express their renewed faith. Religious enthusiasm not only influenced individual spirituality but also had significant social implications, encouraging reform movements related to abolitionism, temperance, and women’s liberation from the home.

Remember, it wasn’t until 1920, that women in America received the privilege to vote. Women stayed at home and raised their children. They cooked the meals, washed the clothes, taught their children, and kept the home clean: -- There were no Congress women, no women vice presidents or presidents, no women pastors, no women CEO’s, no women in the military (except for nurses), very few women working outside the home, etc. Women had a different role in the plan of God than did the men. They were not the same. Husband and wife were one, that is why the wife didn’t vote – for her husband voted for his entire family.

Despite his Puritan heritage, Chauncy opposed Calvinism and its doctrine of total depravity. He held liberal Arminian views on free will, believing that human beings have God-given “natural powers” that were meant to be nurtured toward an actual likeness to God in knowledge, righteousness, and true holiness .

Sometime in the 1750s, Chauncy underwent a thorough scriptural study of Romans and Genesis, concluding that all humanity was destined for eternal salvation. He based this argument on the perfect equivalence between Adam’s downfall and Jesus’ salvational work. As early as 1754, he began circulating his views among local ministers. 

His three works were generally received by Boston’s clerical and political elite, including the diplomat to both France and the Netherlands, John Adams. (John Adams, the second president of the United States Constitution, and one of its founding fathers, was not a Christian. He was a Unitarian, who denied the deity and atoning work of Jesus Christ, like Thomas Jefferson did. He was a believer of the Enlightenment which said that humanity would improve and progress.) 

Benjamin Franklin, (prominent freemason, known to be a religious sceptic, who also denied the divinity of Jesus Christ) became enthralled with Whitefield and quickly befriended the minister. Whitefield and the Awakening helped usher in a strong form of unity and toleration. His views did not make any friends within his own Church of England.

Yikes! We weren’t as Christian as we once thought! And all the founding fathers were directly descended from the highest levels of the British peerage (duke, marquess, earl, viscount or baron.) Many, besides being Unitarians were also Deists, which now is an extinct belief in America. 

Deism was a religious movement that grew out of the Enlightenment worldview. It was based on the idea of a universal natural religion in contrast to the existing revealed religions. Deism maintained that God created the universe and set up the natural laws by which it is governed and does not interfere with it in any supernatural way. 

The First Great Awakening challenged the leading gospel in America to “Free will” or Arminian.

SECOND GREAT AWAKENING

Toward the end of the 18th century, another revival, known as the Second Great Awakening (1795-1850) began in the United States. It began in New England and moved quickly to the Tennessee-Kentucky border. 

This Awakening altered the religious climate in the American colonies for the second time. Ordinary people were encouraged to make a personal connection with God, instead of relying on a minister.

Newer denominations, such as Methodists and Baptists, grew quickly. While the movement unified the colonies and boosted church growth, many scholars say it also caused division among those who supported it and those who rejected it. 

The Second Great Awakening had an enormous effect on American society, changing the way Americans worshiped and preached, inspiring social reform movements like Abolition, Prohibition, Civil Rights, and Woman Suffrage and converting thousands to this new kind of Christianity. Its emphasis on equality of spirit, regardless of race, led to alliances between black leaders in northern cities and white abolitionists. 

African Americans felt empowered by the egalitarian message of the Awakening to form their own black denominations and churches. The African Methodist Episcopal Church and many independent black Baptist churches were formed during this period. 

Think about it: There were no black churches before the end of the 1700s! All Negroes, before this time, went to hell, is what the gospel of the Arminians would say, because the vast majority of the blacks and other races, like the Orientals, never heard of the life, death, and resurrection of Jesus Christ from the time they were on the earth until the late 1700s.

The Second Great Awakening led to the rapid growth of existing Protestant denominations, like the Methodists and Baptists, and the emergence of new religious groups like the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (freemason Mormons), the Shakers, the Onedia Community (utopian community in Onedia, New York), the Millerites (Seventh-day Adventist Church), the Church of Christ, the Christian Church, and many more new forms of religious expression and societal reform. 

And its new gospel message increased the involvement of the non-Israelite races to become this new kind of Christian. The movement emphasized personal salvation (being “born again”), experiencing righteous living, and wanting social reform, and fostering growth in the West and South by increasing the diversity of American religious practice.  

WHAT HAPPENED TO THE PREACHING OF THE “GOSPEL OF THE KINGDOM”?

The gospel began to be changed in America, from its beginning fifty years before the colonies’ Declaration of Independence till now, from Calvinism to Arminianism. Arminianism has grown until it eventually passed Calvinism in the twentieth century. And now it is practically all that one hears in churches, on television or radio broadcasts or on the internet. What is the difference between the two gospels?

Five points of Arminianism:

Conditional Election: 

God’s choice to save individuals is based on His foreknowledge of what people of any race will freely choose. It is up to the individual to choose to serve God. They teach that God is not sovereign, but humans are the ones who decide their own fate if they are to be “saved” or not. Many Arminian churches make the offer for the “lost” people in their congregation to come to the front of the church and say the fifteen second “sinner’s prayer” together with the minister, and they would be guaranteed an afterlife in heaven.

Universal Atonement: 

Christ’s atoning death was intended to be sufficient for all people of all races, not just a select few. Christ died for everyone, but it will only be those who accept His sacrificial death for their sins who will be saved. 

Those people, who do not accept His sacrifice for their sins, are destined for hell, which is what the Arminian says. But they don’t explain how these people who would be going to hell, would still have all their sins paid for but had not confessed their sins??? Christ death and resurrection were vain for most humans in the Arminian gospel. Out of the 8½ billion people on earth today, how many do you think ever hear the word of God? So, according to the Arminian gospel there are more people going to hell than heaven.

Resistible Grace: 

God offers saving grace to all people of all races, but this grace can be resisted and rejected by human free will. In other words, humans are sovereign over Almighty God.

Prevenient Grace: 

God provides a universal grace that “enables” the human will to respond positively to God’s offer of salvation, overcoming the effects of total depravity. Where is this teaching in the Scriptures?

Perseverance of the Saints:

A believer can, through a willful act of unbelief, fall from a state of grace and lose their salvation. They can then, if they repent, be saved a second, third, fourth, etc. number of times. This concept is directly opposite of Calvinism’s view of “once saved, always saved.” Has the Arminian thought that if they are in the “saved” condition now, it would be better if they committed suicide than live and then fall away from salvation? They teach that salvation is not of God, but of human choice.

The doctrine of election, instead of being based on God’s absolute, unconditional predestination in Calvinism, is based on foreseen faith of the individual. The person has the free will to choose God, rather than the other way around. God has no say in the matter. It is man’s election, not God’s election.

But what is the destiny, according to the Arminian gospel, of the millions of babies who are murdered in the wombs of mothers (abortions) or who die by natural means when they are in the womb (miscarriages); they cannot make any decision about Jesus’ sacrifice -- are they doomed to hell? 

What is the destiny, according to the Arminian gospel, of the young infants and children and/or the mentally disabled who die without their condition being healed; they, too, are unable to make any decision about Jesus’ sacrifice – are they doomed to hell?

What is the destiny, according to the Arminian gospel, of people who never hear of Jesus and His sacrificial death and resurrection for His people; they are unable to decide about Jesus’ sacrifice -- are they doomed to hell too?

What is the destiny, according to the Arminian gospel, of all the individuals who were not the descendants of Adam and Eve, and later who were not the descendants of Jacob/Israel and recipients of the Abrahamic Covenant, who they say had their sins paid for by Jesus Christ and who did not confess their sins – are they doomed to hell?

What is the destiny, according to the Arminian gospel, of all the giants, none of whom, confessed their sins either – are they doomed to hell? 

What is the destiny, according to the Arminian gospel, of individuals who believe that Jesus was not the Messiah but was just a bastard (mixed-racial) human who practiced witchcraft. They hate Jesus so much that they say that He went to hell after His death and, of course, was not resurrected. They say that he has been boiling in a hot cauldron for over two millenniums. They made their choice that they do not accept His sacrifice – are they doomed for hell?

CALVINISTIC GOSPEL

The doctrine of atonement, Arminianism perceives as universal, that Christ died for everyone living on the earth, whereas Calvinism holds to a limited atonement for the elect. But here is where Calvinism is wrong too, for it says that the elect come from all the races in the world. God does the choosing, not man. Anyone from any race can be chosen for salvation by God, that is what the Calvinists teach. In fact, William Carey, a Calvinists, started one of the first missionary societies to go and preach and save non-Israelites in India. Carey urged the leaders of the Northampton Baptist Association to find a “society for propagating the gospel among the heathen.” Thus was a Particular Baptist voluntary society born in 1792 that became know as the Baptist Missionary Society.

But both gospels cannot correctly answer the question as to why it was only Israelites that choose God during the last two millenniums of the Old Testament or why it was God who only chose Israelites? No individuals of any other race ever choose God or were chosen by God in all the Old Testament. Why? Both gospels forget the importance of the everlasting Abrahamic Covenant. It is as if it was never made. Why is the story of this everlasting covenant in the Bible then?

The doctrine of Grace, Arminianism teaches is resistible, but Calvinism strongly asserts that God’s grace is irresistible, meaning that the elect cannot ultimately refuse it. Man can counter God’s grace, says the Arminian, which means that he is stronger than Almighty God. 

These two gospels are practically opposites of each other. Who is sovereign: is it God or is it mankind? Did God choose you for salvation or did you choose yourself? A mighty big difference.

But both Calvinism and Arminianism are the wrong gospels. I was a member of two Arminian churches and three smaller Calvinistic churches. The two Arminian churches that I was a member of never knew that they were Arminian. I don’t know if the preachers knew the term, but the vast majority of its members didn’t. They preached this new (couple of centuries old) gospel whose purpose was to “save the lost”. And they were pro-Zionists, which means they were for the enemies of God.

The three Calvinistic churches, that I was a member of, knew that they were Calvinistic and preached their gospel (five centuries old) but didn’t know that they had a genetic enemy. They had other enemies, but not genetic ones. They too were pro-Zionist, which also meant that they were for the enemies of God.

These two gospels have opposing views dealing with God’s sovereignty and man’s responsibility about salvation. But there are very few churches that would say that the men who preach these two different, opposing gospels are accursed as Paul states in Galatians as we saw earlier. And they would accept any person who was under either one of these two gospels and would identify them as being “Christian.”

If the men who are preaching the wrong gospel are to be accursed, it is because theology orders our world. Everything flows from theology -- law, race, marriages, relationships, customs, agriculture, inheritance, jobs, covenants, etc. The right gospel is part of God’s kingdom order, or the wrong gospel is part of this world-system chaos.

Our understanding of the true gospel will be thrown off course by an errant beginning point. For example, most of Christendom today, erroneously, begins with the statement that “all people were created in God’s image.”

They believe that all races of the world have Adam and Eve as their original father and mother, since they are descended from the only survivors of Noah’s flood: Noah and his three sons and their wives, who were all descended from Adam and Eve. But this is the wrong understanding. For there were many individuals that are mentioned in the Bible that lived on both sides of Noah’s flood, i.e., the descendants of Cain and well as the giants.

CHARLIE KIRK’S MEMORIAL SERVICE

One writer, Michael Foust, wrote that we must know what the gospel is about and to whom it pertains. He then said that the gospel was proclaimed clearly and repeatedly during Charlie Kirk’s memorial service on Sunday (September 21, 2025), as individuals testified to the God who was an essential part of the conservative activist’s life.

The service lasted five-hours at State Farm Stadium in Glendale, Arizona included musical worship from some of the top Christian artists. An estimated 200,000 turned up for the event, with more than 70,000 packing the stadium.

Of all the many speakers that day (close to one hundred), a few were Hindus and Jews. The one who would shed the most information on what gospel was proclaimed would be Charlie’s pastor, Rob McCoy of Godspeak Calvary Chapel in California. The late Charlie’s pastor said that the conservative activist loved Jesus far more than he did politics. 

“Charlie wanted his Savior to be the guest of honor,” McCoy told the audience. “He wanted all of you to receive this gift from him – the why in what he did. Charlie was never afraid, because he knew his life was secure in the hands of God.” McCoy declared, “Jesus has come to seek and save that which is lost. And I would say this to all of you: The Lord loves you. He wants to save you. He wants to give you a new life.”

Pastor McCoy speaking at Kirk’s Memorial Service.  Toward the end of his address, McCoy asked those in the massive stadium, who wanted to receive Christ, to stand on their feet. Countless individuals did. 

“The Bible says that when one sinner gives their heart to the Lord, the angels in heaven rejoice, and I’ve got to tell you, there’s one up there right now – Charlie Kirk – he’s stoked, and he’s excited about your commitment to his Savior.” 

Did Pastor McCoy say that Charlie is now an angel? Yes, I believe he did.

Now, what gospel was preached at Charlie’s memorial service? Was it an Arminian or a Calvinistic gospel? It was an Arminian gospel. Charlie’s pastor asked all the people who wanted to receive Christ, and there were an innumerable number who did, in the massive stadium to stand on their feet. The pastor equated their standing to their commitment to Charlie’s Savior. Where is this taught in the Scriptures? Nowhere. It is a false gospel.

R. Albert Mohler, Jr., president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, had nothing but praise for the way the gospel was proclaimed at the memorial: 

“Right now, I am stunned by the sheer weight of Christian testimony that came in that service yesterday. May God use it for the increase of the gospel and all to His glory,” he wrote.

And what is McCoy’s megachurch all about? Here are some of their “events” that were mentioned on their church website:

Join us for our Israel 2025 Orientation Meeting, Wednesday, October 15th [about one month ago] @ 6:00 PM in the Sanctuary. At this meeting you will: 

- Receive your personal travel documents
- Review the detailed trip plans and itinerary
- Meet your fellow tour members
- Get answers to any questions you may have.

For those who live further away from Godspeak, the meeting will also be livestreamed so you can tune in remotely. If you have any questions ahead of time, please email [email protected]. We look forward to seeing you there!

“Join Pastor Rob McCoy on the Godspeak Calvary Chapel Israel Tour, happening November 10-20, 2025! [It begins tomorrow.] Walk in the footsteps of Jesus as we visit Galilee, the Jordan Valley, the Dead Sea, Jerusalem, and more. This 11-day journey includes first-class hotels, daily breakfast and dinner, and expert-guided tours, all for a starting price of $4,146 per person. This is a life-changing opportunity—register today and experience the Holy Land like never before!”

And then, there is their explanation of the Gospel:

The Gospel

“We believe that all people [of all races] are, by nature, separated from God and responsible for their own sin, but that salvation, redemption, and forgiveness are freely offered to all [people of all races] by the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ. When a person [of any race] repents of sin and accepts Jesus Christ as their personal Savior and Lord, trusting Him to save, that person is immediately born again [not born from above] and sealed by the Holy Spirit, all his/her sins are forgiven, and that person becomes a child of God, destined to spend eternity with the Lord.”

Where did this ever happen in the missionary trips of Paul and the other apostles? It never did!

Senior Pastor

Pastor Rob Mccoy recently resigned as senior pastor of the church. Micah Stephens has taken his place. He served at Godspeak Calvary Chapel since his junior year of high school. Over the years, he has held a wide range of roles including maintenance, pastoral assistant, youth pastor, worship pastor, and administrative pastor. In July 2025, he stepped into the role of Senior Pastor.

Micah has been married for 12 years to his wife Molly and is the father of six children. He continues to oversee worship and administration while shepherding the church through weekly teaching, leadership development, and practical discipleship.

The late Charlie’s pastor?

The late Charlie’s new pastor, who is not an Israelite, at his church in California is married to a person of another race (Caucasian) than he is. What are his children then? Does the Bible say that they were permitted to go into the Temple if they were alive during the Old Testament? Would the father be permitted to go into the Temple? No, he would be killed if he did.

Charlie Kirk held for most of his life that he was very pro-Zionist. Here is a picture of him holding an Israeli flag while he was in Israeli.

But Charlie had begun to see that the Jewish community had been doing some questionable things. For example, look at what he recently said:

“Jewish communities have been pushing the exact kind of hatred against whites that they claim that they want people to stop using against them. The ADL [Jewish group that was started with the purpose of not letting anymore Jews be executed after Leo Frank, president of the B’nai B’rith of Atlanta, was hanged for the death of a little girl who was his employee, Mary Phagan. The are a hate group against true Christians.] was part and parcel with Black Lives Matters … It is true that some of the largest financiers of left-wing, anti-white causes have been Jewish Americans … Jewish Americans have been primarily financing cultural Marxist [Karl Marx was a Jew] ideas.”

Then look at what Charlie Kirk said about Israeli. He was openly questioning the story Israel was trying to tell the world about October 7th. 

“So, I’ve [Charlie Kirk] been [to] Israel many times. The whole country is a fortress. When I first heard this story, I still have the same gut instinct that I did initially. I find this very hard to believe. I’ve been to that Gaza border. You cannot go ten feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15 or an automatic machine gun that is an IDF soldier. Right. The whole country is surveilled.”

And then Charlie was pressured by his large (billionaire) Jewish donors to cancel the commitment of Tucker Carlson, who also was questioning Israeli activities, to his December meeting. Charlie refused. He was even thinking of inviting Candace Owens to one of his future rallies. And then within one week of these meetings with some of his before mentioned Jewish donors, he was shot and killed.

And his organization that he founded grew exponentially and is now very pro-Zionist. It is headed by his wife, who was raised Catholic. So, Candace Owens, Megyn Kelley, Miles Mathis (who claims Kirk, and his supposed murderer, Robinson, are Jewish cousins, as well as Kirk’s wife, Erika is also Jewish), and Tucker Carlson, all who were at one time pro-Zionist, asked a few questions about what Israeli is doing in Gaza, and they are called “antisemitic.”

CONCLUSION

The death of Charlie Kirk was like a staged play. There are so many questions that have not been answered that it is getting to look like the 911 event. So, many questions that are never answered, like how did the third tower fall as fast as the other two, when it had no plane that hit the tower and burned for several hours supposedly loosening the steel beams of the structure? 

The city of Orem, Utah and Utah Valley University are heavily Mormon. The Mormons like Jews. Why? Because the Latter-Day Saints were founded by crypto-Jews. Joseph’s Smith’s mother was Lucy Mack, and the Macks were and are Jews. The Mormons founded and still run Las Vegas. So, it is no coincidence this event was run in Orem, Utah. If you will remember, the Robbie Parker from the Sandy Hook Elementary School massacre event was also from Orem, Utah. That is not a coincidence.

Researchers have also discovered that the “crazy” old guy that they first nabbed, who said he shot Charlie, was also interviewed at 911 and the Boston Marathon event. So, he is some kind of professional CIA actor. His name is . . . George Zinn which is, of course, Jewish.

There has been very little news in the last several weeks about the murder of Charlie Kirk and his supposed murderer. The suspected murderer, Tyler Robinson, is expected to go to court soon, but it will be behind closed doors with no media presence. It will all be kept hidden. 

Candace has relayed information that an Egyptian plane landed in Provo, Utah a day before and thirty minutes after Charlie was shot. It left soon after it landed and flew to Egypt the next day.

But I am not going to get dragged into all the unknown information and omissions of what happened in this very suspicious case. I am going to stay focused on what is the true gospel that was preached to the Israelites in their churches. For that is the major issue that is kept secret from the masses. It is the only message which can save our people from complete suicide (genocide).

Look at what Pastor Blanchard says on his website, Your Biblical Heritage Podcast:

“What Evangelical Christianity Believes

In the previous two posts on this subject, I have documented the consensus of opinion about the gospel and to whom evangelicals say it applies. 

Overwhelmingly, that opinion concluded that all ‘human beings’ on the planet are the legitimate recipients of the gospel message. They are all ‘sinners’ in need of spiritual regeneration by the Spirit through the blood sacrifice of Jesus Christ. 

Therefore, the primary focus of evangelical Christianity has been to advance:

1.  Multi-racial churches,
2. Promote foreign global missionary work,
3. And support foreign immigration into the United States of America as well as other countries of Western European origin. 

In a phrase: Diversity, Equality and Inclusion – DEI.​   

It should come as no surprise that if today’s gospel is inclusive of the ‘human race,’ then all things multi-racial must be advanced with vigor. The huge push now for racial equality marches right along in lockstep with:

1.  Politics,
2. The media,
3. In education, and
4. Modern Christianity. 

It’s white supremacy this and white supremacy that. Modern Christianity must promote racial equality at any price and at the expense of White People. The so-called ‘truth’ about race is the theological order of the day for modern-day Christianity.”

Are these modern-day preachers preaching another gospel, Calvinism or Arminianism? Or are they preaching a prosperity gospel or a social gospel or a legalistic gospel or liberal gospel or consumer gospel or a forgiveness-only gospel or a dispensational gospel? Are they called accursed or are they called blessed.

We live in a world that is full of deceit. The Jews have led the push for insanity of almost every issue, from medicine to politics, to the sports world, to entertainment, and to the religious world, too. 

Why is it that the Jews that are so evil? Eviler than any other people. Why have they divided and split the Christian churches to shreds, including Christian Identity. That will be my next sermon.

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.