WHO DID CAIN MARRY?
Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore
May 31, 2020
Genesis 4:16, 17:
16) “And Cain went out from the presence of the LORD, and dwelt in the land of Nod, on the east of Eden.
17) And Cain knew his wife; and she conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city, and called the name of the city, after the name of his son Enoch.”
There is a pledge to fight COVID-19. Every aspect of the current coronavirus pandemic involves organizations, groups and individuals with direct ties to Bill Gates’ $250 million funding. The World Health Organization, the Imperial College COVID-19 Research Team and the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation as well as the National Institutes of Health, whose head is Dr. Anthony Fauci, who has been leading the White House pandemic response team.
Fauci has direct ties to Gates, via both collaborative projects and funding. For example, Fauci is part of Gates’ Decade of Vaccine leadership council, which has tasked itself with implementing the Global Vaccine Action Plan. Gates has committed a staggering $10 billion to this plan. Lo and behold, despite the fact that Fauci is the one with a medical science background, he’s parroting Gates’ statements that nothing can go back to normal until or unless we have a vaccine.
“We need to be truthful to the American people. The American people need the truth” –said the disgruntled employee Dr. Rick Bright, former NIH advisor, House Committee on May 14, 2020. This is the man who is a whistle-blower who has not gone to his job in months and is earning over $285,000 a year. His most quoted statement is that America is heading toward the “darkest winter in modern history.”
But what is the truth? Is this winter the “darkest” or will the virus be gone? Will schools, non-essential businesses (except Planned Parenthood; abortion clinics and liquor stores), and sports all must be locked downed once again? Or will all businesses, schools and sports be open like it was before the “pandemic.” There are people on both sides of this question who are doctors, politicians, and businessmen. We will know who is right in about six months.
And here is an article that I copied from the Babylon Bee, which was sent to me as an email:
“WILLIAMSTOWN, KY—After weeks of wondering when to reopen the Ark Encounter theme park in Williamstown, Kentucky, Answers in Genesis founder Ken Ham finally received the sign he was looking for. The central exhibit of the park is a life-sized recreation of Noah’s ark, from the biblical account of the flood narrative recorded in the book of Genesis. Ham and seven other members of his family have been living in the ark since the nationwide quarantine in mid-March.
For several weeks, Ham has been releasing birds from the ark to see if it’s safe to come out and to allow tourists back into the exhibit.
‘We started with a raven,’ said Ham. ‘He came back after flying around for a while, so we knew it wasn’t time yet. Then later, one of the doves did the same thing. But this week, the dove came back with a discarded face mask in her mouth. That was the sign we were waiting for. Based on that timeline, we think June 8 will be the best day to reopen.’
When asked if the reopening schedule had anything to do with Kentucky governor Andy Beshear’s announcement that museums and outdoor attractions can reopen on June 8, Ham said no. He claims his decision was based solely on the information provided by the dove and the face mask.
Based on early meteorological models, experts are also predicting a rainbow for the proposed reopening date.”
A PERPLEXING BIBLE QUESTION
The same is true regarding Bible doctrines. One of the most-asked questions in the Bible is, “Where did Cain get his wife?” Skeptics have found that many Christians are easily stumped by this query. William Jennings Bryant was unable to give a good answer to this question in the Scopes trial. The Scopes Trial was held in Dayton, Tennessee in 1925. Bryant was the prosecutor who stood for the universal Judeo-Christian faith, failed to answer the question about Cain’s wife as posed by the Jewish ACLU lawyer Clarence Darrow. The trial was billed as Christianity’s Bible vs. Darwin’s Evolutionary Theories.
Consider the following excerpt from the infamous evolution trial record as Darrow interrogates Bryant. Before I begin it is necessary to explain why the defense lawyer is questioning the prosecutor. This was a planned media showcase (live radio and newspapers) to try and promote the teaching of evolution; and the way to do it was by a trial. The defendant was a substitute teacher who didn’t even know if he had taught evolution at all. He just agreed to be the defendant in the case. Someone had to be the defendant or there would not be a case. And if there wasn’t a case, then evolution would not be taught in the public schools. So, the pressure was on for evolution to win this case.
The prosecutor and defense lawyers agreed to question each other. This was a very unusual situation. Has anyone ever seen a prosecutor, or a defense lawyer take the stand? The agreement was that both would take the witness stand, with the prosecutor going first. After the questioning was over, the defense lawyer would take the stand with the prosecutor questioning him.
But the defense lawyer, Darrow, didn’t take the stand. Why? Because the defense lawyer, after he had finished asking all his questions, agreed to a guilty ruling. As soon as he did this, the trial was over. There was no need for him to take the witness stand. He had destroyed the arguments that were put up by the Christian representative and evolution was the winner. The defense technically lost the case but won the war. Evolution was free to be taught in the public schools after this trial.
Here is a part of the questioning that the defense lawyer (Darrow) asked the prosecutor (Jennings; who was three times a presidential nominee) who was on the witness stand. This scene became one of the highlights of the movie “Inherit the Wind” that was the story of the Scopes Trial. The questioning dwelt with one of the most perplexing Bible questions…Where did Cain get his wife?
SCOPE’S TRIAL DIALOGUE
DARROW QUESTIONING JENNINGS
Q—Did you [Jennings] ever discover where Cain got his wife?
A—No, sir; I leave the agnostics to hunt for her.
(Much laughter from the audience).
Q—You have never found out?
A—I have never tried to find.
Q—You have never tried to find?
Q—The Bible says he got one [a wife] doesn’t it? Were there other people [besides the three people] on the earth at that time?
A—I cannot say.
Q—You cannot say. Did that ever enter your consideration?
A—Never bothered me.
Q—There were no others recorded, but Cain got a wife.
A—That is what the Bible says.
Q—Where she came from you do not know?
This was a major victory for the Jewish ACLU. Darrow got Jennings to admit that he had never even thought about where Cain got his wife, in fact, he never even tried. Darrow implied that there were just three people in the world at the time and Jennings didn’t even bother to find out. Darrow’s conclusion: The Bible is a book of myths.
The world’s media was focused on this trial, and what they heard has affected Christianity to this day—the fundamental Christians that Jennings represented; he couldn’t defend the biblical record! William Jennings Bryant answered Darrow’s questions that he was unaware of who his wife was or where Cain got his wife. And it didn’t matter to him. I would ask, “Why not?”
Because Bryant was a universal believer, was the real reason that it didn’t matter to him. Related to his answer was the broader issue of whether God made the entire human race or was there more than one seed on the earth?
What Clarence Darrow was implying:
If Cain and Abel were the sons of Adam and Eve and Cain killed Abel that would leave three people left on the earth. Where did he get his wife?
William Jennings Bryant answered that he didn’t know and didn’t care. He just believed that he got a wife.
The media took Jennings’ lack of an adequate answer to the detriment of fundamentalist Christianity and in favor of evolution. It would be interesting to see how much this movie influenced the watchers. Remember, Walt said that this movie convinced him, when he was young, that the Bible was a book of myths. Walt said that his life was in the pit for almost 20 years until he finally read the Bible once again. Walt’s eyes were opened to the truth of the two seed line doctrine.
WHO WAS LIVING IN PALESTINE?
Let’s reason together for a little bit. Does the Bible depict two different seed lines that hate one another? Does the Bible tell of two different seed lines that have a different destiny? Does the Bible instruct us that these two different seed lines are enemies of each other? Let’s consider one place where this is very true.
Let’s look at the individuals who were living in Judea at the time of Christ. Were they all Israelites? We’re not talking about Galilee or Samaria, but Judea. Were all the Judaeans of that time Israelites? Were they all of one seed or were they of two seeds?
Let’s look at which of the three sections (Galilee, Samaria or Judea) the following took place:
Where did Jesus live most of his life? Galilee.
Where was the territory of Jesus’ ministry? Galilee.
Where is Nazareth, Capernaum and Gaza? Galilee.
Where did Jesus walk on the water? Sea of Galilee, in Galilee.
Where did Jesus choose eleven of his disciples? Galilee.
Where were most of the inhabitants mulatoes or non-Israelites? Samaria.
Where was Jesus living when as an infant Herod, the Edomite, attempted to kill him. Judea.
Where was John the Baptist beheaded? Judea.
Where did Jesus not walk for fear of the Jews killing him. Judea.
Where was Jesus crucified? Judea.
Where did Jesus go after His resurrection? Galilee.
Were all the Judaeans at the time of Christ-- Israelites? Were they all of one seed or were they of two seeds? Are there at least two different seed lines in the world or is there only one?
If there were all of one seed, then one may be deceived into thinking that:
All men are equal,
That sperm can be spiritual, and
That one’s behavior can somehow dictate one’s origin.
But if a person could somehow change his behavior, then would that change his parentage?
Let’s look at what one of the world’s best deceivers, the universalist Ken Ham, head of Answers in Genesis. He is, of course, a one seeder. Here’s is what he says:
“There were no other people on earth as some have claimed. God did not create other people groups from which Cain choose a wife, as we are all made of one blood (Acts 17:26). If he [God] had made others, other people would not have been able to be saved from their sins, since only descendants of Adam can be saved—that is why it is so important for Jesus to be Adam’s descendant.”
What did Ken Ham say? Only the descendants of Adam can be saved. Nobody else—only Adam and Eve’s offspring. So, if there were other seed lines besides Adam’s, these other seed lines could never be saved.
Wow! That is Answers in Genesis’ major problem. They are teaching a half-truth. They made a statement that is correct, but then the way that they interpret it changes the truth into nothing but complete heresy. If there is just one seed line, then everyone is descended from the same two parents; and that is exactly what they say. And since there is only one seed line, then everyone on the earth can be saved. No one is eliminated. Everyone on the earth is equal. Everyone on the earth has an opportunity to be a child of God. Everyone on the earth can be in the kingdom of God. Everyone on the earth can be a believer. There is no such thing as a racial stranger, for there is only one race.
That is the reason that they said that Cain married his sister or niece. According to their view and most of Christianity’s, there was only one seed line. It was the only choice that they had.
They don’t believe in a sovereign God. They believe that they, themselves, are sovereign; even though they:
Didn’t have a choice as to when they were born,
Didn’t have a choice in who their parents would be,
Didn’t have a choice in where (what country, state, city) they were born,
Didn’t have a choice in what their intelligence quota would be,
Didn’t have a choice in what their gender would be,
Didn’t have a choice in what they are inherently good at,
What the universalist can’t agree on is there are individuals who never have a choice in believing what the Savior said, “Ye believe not because ye are not My sheep…” (John 10:26).
But can it be demonstrated historically and biblically that many, if not most, of the Judaeans of the time of Christ were the offspring of Edomites (descendants of Esau) and Hittites (descendants of Canaanites)? These Idumeans were not Israelites. They were mulatoes. Is there Scripture that says that they couldn’t become a believer? And can it also be demonstrated that the Edomites or Idumeans had usurped the government and the offices of the temple, and these were the adversaries of Christ? As Jesus Himself told them, “ye believe not, because ye are not of My sheep...” (John 10:26).
Who was it that Jesus told them they could not believe, because they were not of His sheep? They couldn’t believe. They were unable to believe. They could never, never believe. If they weren’t of His sheep, then they must have been goats. Neither sheep nor goats are sovereign.
The universalists are wrong. Goats cannot believe and become sheep. A tare can’t become a wheat. Sheep may not believe, but they are still sheep.
The Edomites descended from the seed of the serpent where Esau had taken wives of the Canaanites, who were in turn mingled with the Kenites and the Rephaim (giants), and they were the descendants of both Cain and a father of another seed, possibly angelic.
[I would ask Ken Ham and others who have similar views, can a goat become a sheep? Can a tare become wheat? “Ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep…” means what? The goats and tares cannot be saved! Why is that? Wasn’t it Ken Ham that said, “only descendants of Adam and Eve could be saved”?
And that takes us to a puzzling part of the Holy Scriptures to the Judeo-Christian. How do they explain the LORD God of the Bible when He supposedly told His people to genocide the Canaanites nations? They don’t consider the many verses of holy Scripture to mean what they seem to mean. Here is one of the many:
Deuteronomy 7:2, 3: " And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them [the seven Canaanite nations] before thee [Israelites]; thou shall smite them [Canaanites], and utterly destroy them [Canaanites]; thou shalt make no covenant with them [Canaanites], nor shew mercy unto them [Canaanites].
3) Neither shalt thou [Israelite] make marriages with them [Canaanites]; thy [Israelite] daughter thou shalt not give unto his [Canaanite] son, nor his [Canaanite] daughter shalt thou take unto thy [Israelite] son.”
The God of the Bible, who was the king of Israel, told His people to “utterly destroy” the Canaanites from off the earth. No one was to survive. If everyone was of one seed, why would such a command be given? Don’t the one-seeders think that there could have been a couple of Canaanites who might have believed? But to the two-seeders, this statement commanded by God makes perfect sense. There were two seed lines and the Canaanites were of one seed line and the Israelites were of the other. They were bitter enemies for life.
WHO WAS CAIN’S WIFE?
But, let us examine the possibilities as to who Cain’s wife could be:
Some say that he married his sister or half-sister, a daughter of Adam and Eve or one of their nieces.
Some say that he racially intermarried with an Indian or Chinese woman.
Some say that he racially intermarried with a Negro.
Some say that he married someone and that they are not told what identity the person was, so, as a result they have no idea. This group says that it doesn’t make any difference who he married.
Possibility #4 was what the prosecutor said in the Scopes’ Trial. This is not a good choice. So, we will quickly discard this choice.
The most popular answer today is number #1. The Book of Jubilees gives the name of Cain’s wife as Awan. The book of Adam and Eve gives her name as Luluwa. The Bible does not mention what her name was and omits telling the readers where she came from and what her origins. It only gives us clues.
If the Bible reader believes that Adam and Eve were the only two people who were living in the whole earth in Genesis, chapter 3, then that answer (#1) is the only one that makes sense. For if they also believe that Cain and Abel were their first two children, then when Cain killed Abel there were only three people on the entire earth ... unless, Adam and Eve had other children before the murder (which was possible).
So, if that is what they believe, then Cain could only marry another descendant of Adam and Eve; his sister or half-sister or a niece.
But there are some problems with this view. If Adam, Eve and Cain are the only people yet living on the earth, why is Cain afraid that in his wanderings “anyone who meets me may kill me” (Genesis 4:14)?
Genesis 4:14: “Behold, thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth: and from thy face shall I be hid; and I shall be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth; and it shall come to pass, that everyone that findeth me shall slay me.”
Very few Bible readers ever ask the question as to why would Cain, who would “…be a fugitive and a vagabond in the earth” be afraid that someone would find him in his travels outside of Eden and attempt to slay him. Doesn’t it mean that there are other individuals who are leaving outside of Eden. If it doesn’t, Cain would be living by himself outside of Eden.
Cain was a farmer. Part of his curse was that he would no longer be one. The crops would no longer produce for him. Because he could not no longer raise his own food, he would be a vagabond and a fugitive forever.
He would have to be a parasite in order to get his food to eat. This would be true for all his descendants for an eternity. They could own farms, but they could never be a farmer. They were be fugitives and vagabonds forever. Do you like parasites who eat your food?
CAIN’S BROTHERS AND SISTERS
Look at what Answers in Genesis says about Cain’s brothers and sisters:
“In Genesis 5:4 we read a statement that sums up the life of Adam and Eve: ‘After he begot Seth, the days of Adam were eight hundred years; and he had sons and daughters.’”
[How many children did Adam and Eve have? Does anyone know?]
“During their lives, Adam and Eve had a number of male and female children. In fact, the Jewish historian Josephus wrote, ‘The number of Adam’s children, as says the old tradition, was thirty-three sons and twenty-three daughters [56 children].’
Scripture doesn’t tell us how many children were born to Adam and Eve, but considering their long life spans (Adam lived for 930 years—Genesis 5:5), it would seem logical to suggest there were many. Remember, they were commanded to ‘be fruitful, and multiply’ (Genesis 1:28).
If we now work totally from Scripture, without any personal prejudices or other extrabiblical ideas, then back at the beginning, when there was only the first generation, brothers would have had to marry sisters or there wouldn’t have been any more generations!
‘WE’RE NOT TOLD WHEN CAIN MARRIED OR MANY OF THE DETAILS OF OTHER MARRIAGES AND CHILDREN, BUT WE CAN SAY FOR CERTAIN THAT CAIN’S WIFE WAS EITHER HIS SISTER OR A CLOSE RELATIVE.’”
[Thus, Answers in Genesis and the majority of the corrupt media agree, that all people and individuals in the world are all descended from Adam and Eve. They believe that there is only one race—the human race!]
PARABLE OF WHEAT AND TARES
Who did Cain marry? Your answer is determined by whether you think there is one seed or more. The devil knows the Holy Scriptures better than I do. Don’t you think that one of his strategies would be to get his people to teach the misinterpretation of the Holy Scripture? How would he teach what this parable means?
24) Another parable put He forth unto them, saying, The kingdom of heaven is likened unto a man which sowed good seed in his field:
25) But while men slept, his enemy came and sowed tares among the wheat, and went his way.
26) But when the blade was sprung up, and brought forth fruit, then appeared the tares also.
27) So the servants of the householder came and said unto him, Sir, didst not thou sow good seed in thy field? from whence then hath it tares?
28) He said unto them, An enemy hath done this. The servants said unto him, Wilt thou then that we go and gather them up?
29) But he said, Nay; lest while ye gather up the tares, ye root up also the wheat with them.
30) Let both grow together until the harvest: and in the time of harvest I will say to the reapers, Gather ye together first the tares, and bind them in bundles to burn them: but gather the wheat into my barn.
HOW WOULD THE UNIVERSALIST INTERPRETE THIS PARABLE?
Let’s look how a universalist teaches what this parable means (in bold letters):
“Then, He [Jesus] started telling them what the story meant: The one who planted the good seed is the Son of Man – v. 37.”
[Who was Jesus telling this part of the explanation of the parable to? In other words, who is the “them” in verse 37? In verse 36 is the answer that the interpreter of this article forgot to mention. Jesus “…sent the multitude away…” and began to teach “His disciples” the meaning of the parable which told of things “that have been kept secret from the foundation of the world” (verse 35). Jesus was teaching His disciples one of the secrets from the beginning of the world.]
“Did you know that Jesus is the Son of Man? Yes He is and He is the one who plants the good seed. When someone asks Jesus to be their Lord and Savior, they are asking Him to plant the good seed in their heart.”
[The LORD God is the creator who planted the good seed. I think that we are all in agreement with that sentence. But the next sentence is very confusing. Where in the parable does it say that the planter planted the good seed in their heart? What is the good seed and where is it planted? The next two sentences provide more reasons why I am confused by what this article is saying. Read closely, does it say that the seed is placed in the heart of the believer?]
“Then He continued: The field is the world. The good seed stands for the people who belong to the kingdom – Verse 38a.
God has planted Christians all over the world. The world is like a big field that God has planted with good seed. These are true Christians that belong to Jesus and one day will be with Him in heaven and will spend eternity with Him.”
[Notice the picture of all the children of different races holding hands that encircle the world. The article now changes its mind and says that God plants Christians all over the world. I guess He doesn’t plant seed in the hearts of his people; he plants Christians.
But think for a second. Why is this wrong? How many years have there been Christians? Was Adam a Christian? Moses a Christian? Abraham a Christian? Jeremiah a Christian? Now the article says that the field is the world. And the good seed are the people of the kingdom. Now how could the seed (the people of the kingdom) be sown in the hearts of the people? How do you fit a person into someone’s heart? It makes no sense. If the parable tells of secrets that were hidden from the foundation of the earth, this would include the time where there were no Christians on the earth!
The article shows that all races are part of the good seed. One starts out as a neutral seed and then it is up to the person to become either a good or bad seed. The last sentence of the above article says that the good seed will spend eternity in heaven with Jesus. Where does it say this in the Bible? The eternal destiny of God’s people is the earth in the kingdom of Israel.
Does the fact that the people He made an everlasting blood covenant with mean anything?
Does the fact that the people that He was king over mean anything?
Does the fact that the people that He gave His laws, commandments and ordinances mean anything?
Does the fact that the people that He fed angel’s food for almost 40 years mean anything?
Does the fact that the people that He was with in the Temple of the LORD God mean anything?
Does the fact that He gave the command for all the enemies of His people to be destroyed mean anything?
Does the fact that the non-Israelites who approached the Temple of God were to be killed mean anything?
Does the fact that His people who experienced the blood of the slain lamb at Passover mean anything?
Does the fact that His people who had the very organized camp in the wilderness with the fire at night and the cloud by day which went up from the inner sanctuary of the tabernacle mean anything,
The fire went up by night and the cloud by day. Its origin was the inner sanctuary of the tabernacle.
Does the fact that His people who had the High Priest enter the inner sanctuary or the Holy of Holies once a year to offer the blood that was shed on behalf of the people mean anything?
Does the fact that the people whose Savior was called the “Passover lamb” mean anything?
Does the fact that the blood of the Passover lamb shed for His people mean anything?
Does the fact that the resurrection of this “Passover lamb” who took his blood as the High Priest to the mercy seat in heaven for His people mean anything?
Does the fact that the nation who walked dry-shod through the Red Sea mean anything?
“The weeds are the people who belong to the evil one. The enemy who plants them is the devil – (vs. 38b-39a).”
[How did the devil plant the tares or weeds. Where did he plant them? Did the devil plant them in the field or world too? What did this explanation have to do with secrets kept from the foundation of the world?]
“The tares are people who do not know God and want nothing to do with Jesus. They are always fighting and are liars like the devil. The tares follow the things the world. They read books about witchcraft, spells and magic like Harry Potter and play games like the Ouija board and other violent games that a true Christian would not play because they love God and the Bible tells us not to do those things.”
[Are the tares people who do not know God? Did the devil know God? Does the devil know Scripture? I believe that the devil knows more Scripture than I do. He wasn’t afraid to ask Jesus about some of the verses in the Bible. But he met his match. Do all the evil seed love or hate the LORD God and do what they want to do? They are promoters of death and destruction; they are not builders.]
If Cain and Abel were both sons of Adam and Eve, that would eliminate any difference between the seed of the serpent and the seed of the woman. If such a thing were true, which it isn’t, there would be nothing wrong with inviting descendants of Cain, Canaan, Rephaim and Edom into our churches and identity meetings. Do you understand why that happens today, if the churches believe that everyone is descended from the same parents?
But what if this isn’t true. What if Cain and Abel were not both sons of Adam and Eve? Does one have to guess at which view is true? There are a few people, like John Lightfoot who says the following on page 83 of his book, A Commentary on the New Testament from the Talmud and Hebraica, volume 2, pages 83:
“The war proclaimed of old in Eden between the serpent, and the seed of the serpent, and the seed of the woman, Gen. 3:15, now takes place; when that promised seed of the woman comes forth into the field (being initiated by baptism, and anointed by the Holy Ghost, unto the public office of his ministry) to fight with the old serpent, and at last to bruise his head. And, since the devil was always a most impudent spirit, now he takes upon him a more hardened boldness than ever, even of waging war with him whom he knew to be the Son of God, because from that ancient proclamation of this war he knew well enough that he should bruise his heel.”
Answers in Genesis and the like fails to mention that John the Baptist and Jesus the Christ called the Pharisees and Sadducees “vipers.” Why would they call these people also, “the offspring of the serpent”? Are these just random sayings or are they clues as to where they originated? Is this the secret kept hidden from the foundation of the world?
“You have not begun to appreciate the real depth of our guilt. We are intruders. We are disturbers. We are subverters. We have taken your natural world, your ideals, your destiny, and played havoc with them.”--Marcus Eli Ravage, Jewish author, quote from January 1928 issue of Century Magazine.
“We Jews, we, the destroyers, will remain the destroyers for ever. Nothing that you will do will meet our needs and demands. We will for ever destroy because we need a world of our own, a God-world, which it is not in your nature to build.”--Maurice Samuels, Jewish author, quote from You Gentiles.
Is there just one seed on the earth or is there at least two?
Meet Kellie Chauvin also known as Kelli May Xiong; she is the wife of Derek Chauvin, the Minneapolis police officer who knelt on the neck of George Floyd who later died.
Kelli Chauvin was born Kelli May Thao on October 21, 1974, in Laos. Kellie was still a little girl when her family fled for safety from Laos to a refugee camp in Thailand. In 1980, she eventually moved to Eau Claire, Wisconsin, where her parents later got her into an arranged marriage to Kujay Xiong, a man she barely knew.
“As a Hmong woman, if you’re not married by 18 then your parents think that nobody will marry you,’’ Kellie Chauvin said.
Kellie and Kujay, had two children together, including George Xiong. Kellie said her husband was abusive and eventually filed for divorce. Her ex-husband died in 2013.
She met her police husband when she worked at the hospital and they married in 2010. In 2018 she competed in the Mrs. Minnesota pageant. She divorced her husband immediately after he was charged with the murder of George Floyd. One of the other three officers with Derek during the murder of George Floyd was Tou Thao who some say is the brother of Derek’s wife.
Ezra 9:2: “For they have taken of their daughters for themselves, and for their sons: so that the holy seed have mingled themselves with the people of those lands; yea, the hand of the princes and rulers have been chief in this trespass.”
Mitch McConnell is married to a Chinese woman too. May the LORD God have mercy on us.
To be continued.
Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.