Evil Good and Good Evil - Part 2

SEGREGATION

Copied from the sermon notes of Pastor Don Elmore

October 4, 2020

Scripture Reading:  Exodus 33:16  “For wherein shall it be known here that I and Thy people have found grace in Thy sight? Is it not in that Thou goest with us? So shall we be separated, I and Thy people, from all the people that are on the face of the earth.”

To begin this sermon, I will give a quick review of Part 1.

The Democratic National Convention gave us the clue that they are demonic. What else could this odd-looking star mean if not demonic?

The Democratic National Convention gives away the clue that they are demonic. This odd-looking star is very similar to the pentagram symbol of satanism.Satanic pentagramSymbol of satan with pentagram on forehead

Republicans and Democrats believe the opposite on what is the “light” that they both argued about in the conventions. But I believe both parties are wrong in their definitions. However, the Republicans’ view are a whole lot better than the Democrats’, for the Republicans are:

  • Against the murder of the unborn,

  • For school choice,

  • For less regulation in businesses,

  • For reduced taxes,

  • For energy independence,

  • For secure borders,

  • For the funding of the police,

  • For fracking and energy independence,

  • For public control against the burning, looting and murders in the communities,

  • For public worship in churches,

  • For the suburbs remaining the same, as opposed to the larger cities that are near them taking and destroying the suburbs (no more single housing),

  • For the returning of American jobs that have gone overseas,

  • For fair trade agreements that put America first,

  • For keeping America’s institutions intact,

  • Against the lying national media,

  • Etc.

The capitalist integrationist Republicans are more correct than the very hardcore communist Democrats, but they both do not know what “Made America Great” and what will “Make American Great Again”. Did God’s blessing on the common fathers [Abraham, Isaac and Jacob] of the American settlers have anything to do with the greatness of America?

The Democrats are demonically inspired. They are threatening Senators, small business owners and opponents of their political and religious views with physical harm, even death. Who are these Burners, Looters, and Murderers? Who is paying them to come to the locations that are in an uproar of rioting? Men like the Jew Norm Ison, the Jew George Soros and the woman like the Jew Susan Rosenberg, who was paroled on the last day President Bill Clinton was in office. They also are worshippers of strange god(s)—most are billionaires and the have financed the attempt to make America a communist nation.

Kamala Harris, the Democratic candidate for vice-president, raised funds (contributed to by many high-level Democrats) to pay to get the rioters out of prison as fast as they were put in. That should be considered treasonous behavior.

The first issue that neither party will support is to be against sodomy and all its support groups. Thom Brennaman, an announcer for the Cincinnati Reds, was immediately suspended and may even lose his job(s) because he referred to another city as being the “fagot capital of the world.” That was all that was heard – those five words. He later resigned his position. And yet, BLM harassers, after the RNC called a couple of sodomites the same word, plus they threw a drink and a cup at one of the them -- nothing was done to them.

The second issue that neither party has as one of their programs in their platform is that America should be segregated, not integrated. Both national parties favor integration – it is not even discussed.

But America started as a basic segregated nation. Only Caucasian men who were property owners could vote. After the War between the States, men of color also got the right to vote. Then, 100 years ago, women suffrage won its battle and they got the right to vote. Then it was people who were at least 18 years old, not 21, who received the right to vote.

One time in the United States there were the white side of town and the colored side of town. There were white businesses and colored businesses. There were white schools and colored schools. There were white churches and colored churches. There were white ball teams and there were colored leagues. There were white drinking fountains and there were colored drinking fountains.

There were the Jim Crow laws. All this is not endorsed by either political party. They once were, but now both political parties assume that it was an evil time. No one in either party says that this was better than what we have now. The second issue that both parties have no issue with is that integration is better than segregation. Forced integration was advertised as necessary for peace. But it has delivered lawlessness and strife.

Exodus 33:16“For wherein shall it be known here that I and Thy people have found grace in Thy sight? Is it not in that Thou goest with us? So shall we be separated, I and Thy people, from all the people that are on the face of the earth.”

Moses was talking to the people who were descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob’s seed. God told them that they would be separated (not integrated) from all the people that are on the face of the earth. This verse is one of several in the Bible, that proves that it was the will of the God of Israel for them to be completely separated from all other nations. Are they separated now or are they integrated now?

In fact, the image of our nation is the Statue of Liberty in New York City. Almost every American believes that we are the “melting pot” of the world. Both Republican and Democratic parties endorse the policy of integration. They both state that the strength of our nation is the diversity and inclusion of all races and cultures.

INTEGRATION

This surprising article was written by the Editor of the Cincinnati Enquirer. It appeared in the Sunday edition on August 23, 2020. He wrote these amazing words:

THIS IS OUR NEWSROOM DIVERSITY PROMISE

“A first and important step is to make sure our newsrooms reflect the racial, ethnic and sexual orientation of the communities we serve.”

How our newsroom demographics compare to our city [Cincinnati]:

20.8% of our newsroom employees are people of color,

22.2% of people in our community are people of color.

40.3% of our newsroom employees are female,

51% of people in our community are female.

11.5% of our newsroom employees identify as Black,

13.2% of people in our community identify as Black.

5.1% of our newsroom employees identify as two or more races,

2.2% of people in our community identify as two or more races.

0% of our newsroom employees identify as Latinos or Hispanic,

3.2% of people in our community identify as Latinos or Hispanics.

2% of our newsroom employees identify as Asians,

3% of people in our community identify as Asians.

But this is “crazy.” Didn’t the President of the United States use that word to describe the actions of the Democrats recently? What if the Cincinnati area was flooded with so many Vietnam refugees that they reached 8% of the population? Should the newsroom strive to have 8% of its population Vietnamese? What if the population of a certain racial group declined? Should they fire one of its workers who were of the same race so they would be equal to the community?

And what about sexual orientation? Do they have the same percentage of sodomite people as the population has? What about bi-sexual? What about transgendered? What about Christians, Jews, Moslems, atheists, etc.? What about single, married, married and divorced? What about those married four times? Does he want the nation’s ball teams to use the same scenario? They certainly don’t now!

The editor then wrote this paragraph later in his article:

“Our awakening goes beyond the newsroom. We are aligning all of our company’s resources in support of social change. The Gannett Foundation is making direct grants and matching employee donations to organizations focused on racial equity and social justice. We will leverage the vast reach of our advertising platforms to drive awareness on issues of systemic racism. And, we will support our employees’ volunteer efforts in this space by providing paid time off.”

The newspaper says that it will match employee donations to organizations that are focused on racial equity and social justice, i.e. like Black Lives Matter. Plus, they will play their employees for volunteer efforts by providing paid time off in order to drive awareness on issues of systemic racism. Does that mean that they will pay for protestors? Or rioters? Don’t they know that the BLM organization was started by three lesbian Marxists-trained individuals who are involved with witchcraft – they communicate with the dead.

Racial equity and social justice are major goals in pro-Democratic Party organizations, like the Cincinnati Enquirer. Black Lives Matter will receive donations from the many individuals who are either Judeo-Christians or non-Christians. But what is the systemic racism that was mentioned in the article and now is a buzz word in the mouths of many in the political world today? The owners of the Cincinnati Enquirer are seeking social change. They are focused on racial equality and social justice and want to eliminate systemic racism from the culture. But what do all these words mean?

Systemic Racism

Who was the individual who developed and began to use this phrase? These two words were unknown until less than 200 years ago. Does anyone know? It was developed by a sociologist and a Marxist. And who is a Marxist? Do you remember that the three lesbian co-founders of Black Lives Matter were trained by Marxists? Marxism originates from the works of 19th-century German philosophers Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. According to orthodox Marxist theory, the overthrow of capitalism by a socialist revolution in contemporary society is inevitable. Marxists argue that a socialist society is far better for the majority of the populace than its capitalist counterpart.

Karl Marx, descendant of a family of rabbis. Notice where his hand is a freemasonic sign.Karl Marx was born in 1818 in Trier, Prussia; the oldest city in Prussia. He was the oldest surviving boy in a family of nine children. Both of his parents were Jewish, and descended from a long line of rabbis, but his father, a lawyer, converted to Lutheranism in 1816 due to contemporary laws barring Jews from higher society. Young Karl was baptized in the same church at the age of 6, but later became an atheist, i.e. a pagan Satanist.

The 1917 Russian Revolution, which overthrew over 300 years of tsarist rule, had its roots in Marxist beliefs. The revolution’s leader, Vladimir Lenin, built his new proletarian government based on his interpretation of Marxist thought, turning Karl Marx into an internationally famous figure more than 30 years after his death. Communism follows the beliefs of individuals who hate the God of the Bible.

Karl Marx wrote about his and Frederich Engels views in the book, “The Communist Manifesto”. The text became a significant political influence on the German public and led to Marx being expelled from Deutschland [Germany]. Marx was expelled from Germany several score of years BEFORE the Nazis came to power. This prompted Marx’s permanent move to London and the pamphlet’s 1850 publication in English for the first time.  Do you think Germany’s expelling Marx was the correct thing to do?

The Black Lives Matter movement in the United States, which is supported by over 200 corporations, almost all the professional and college sport teams, most big-time entertainers, is Marxist. So, these organizations support the same views that the Russian Revolution supported. They are supporting communism!

The co-founders of this organization (BLM) stated in an interview, which was taped, that they were trained by Marxists.

“We are trained Marxists. We are, super, versed in sort of ideologies.”

They were trained by Communists! There have also admitted that they are also pagan Satanists who regularly talk with the dead, i.e. witchcraft. The ancestors of the dead have given them the advice and strength to carry on. And there are churches with BLM banners!

Deuteronomy 18:10-11:

10) “There shall not be found among you any one that maketh his son or his daughter to pass through the fire, or that useth divination, or an observer of times, or an enchanter, or a witch,

11) Or a charmer, or a consulter with familiar spirits, or a wizard or a necromancer.”

Well, back to the question as to who the first person was who used the phrase “systemic racism”. It was developed by sociologist and Marxist, Joe Feagin. A Marxist! A communist!

Systemic racism is a popular way of explaining, within the social sciences and humanities, the significance of race and racism both historically and in today’s world. Feagin describes the concept and the realities attached to it in his book, “Racist America: Roots, Current Realities, and Future Reparations.”

In it, Feagin uses his view on historical evidence and demographic statistics to create a theory that asserts that the United States was founded in racism since the Constitution classified black people as the property of white people. I don’t know what Feagin says about the blacks who owned slaves; even the blacks who owned white slaves. But Feagin illustrates that the legal recognition of slavery based on race is a cornerstone of a racist social system in which resources and rights were and are:

  • Unjustly given to white people, and

  • Unjustly denied to people of color.

Joe Feagin did not know about the God of the Bible; he has another god. More about that later in this sermon. But let us look at his last sentence, “…slavery based on race is a cornerstone of a racist social system in which the resources and rights were and are unjustly given to white people and unjustly denied to people of color.” That implies that the slave owners were white, and the slaves were black. It ignores the fact of the blacks who captured and sold their fellow blacks to the jewish and Arab slave traders, who traveled on jewish boats and who were sold to mostly white slave owners in the United States because the king of England was in debt to the usury bankers.

For starters, how many black slave owners were there in the United States in 1830? Were there:

  1. 0;

  2. 4;

  3. 40;

  4. 400;

  5. 4000;

  6. 40,000;

  7. 400,000;

The answer given later in this sermon.

In fact, the first legal slave owner in America was a black man (not the first slave owner). He was captured as a slave in Angola, Africa by an enemy tribe of other black Africans. He was sold to Arab (Muslim) slave traders. He was eventually sold as an indentured servant to a merchant working for the Virginia East India Company. He married a person of his race (black) who came to his plantation from England.

The man was called Antonio. Sometime after 1635, Antonio and his wife, Mary, gained their freedom from indenture servitude. Antonio changed his name to Anthony Johnson.

Sixteen years later, in 1651, Anthony owned 250 acres and the services of four white and one black indenture servants. The black indentured servant demanded that Johnson release him after his seven years of indenture. The case eventually went to court and Anthony won. The black slave of Anthony Johnson became the first person of African descent in Britain’s Thirteen Colonies to be declared as a slave for life as the result of Johnson’s civil suit.

But he was the not the only black slave owner. In 1860, right before the War Between the States, white or black slave owners owned around one to five slaves on the average. About 28% of the free black population in New Orleans at the time owned slaves with at least six owning 65 slaves or more.

  • C. Richards, a widow and her son P. C. operated a large sugar plantation together and owned more slaves than all other black slave owners in Louisiana.

  • Kingdom of KongoDuring the 1730s the Pendarvis family was one of the most prominent in the South, owning the biggest rice plantations in the Palmetto region and over 123 slaves. They became one of the wealthiest slaveholding families in South Carolina. Marie met her husband in the Kingdom of Kongo in Africa. Marie was black, while her husband was a white Frenchman named Claude Metoyer. It was a time when interracial marriage was considered wrong and immoral. (Why is it now considered right and moral?) So, Marie technically remained a slave to her husband. They moved to Louisiana and had their six children. After this they divorced, and Marie was made free. Claude went to France and married a white woman, while Marie started a tobacco plantation. They became the largest slave owners in their county with 287 slaves by 1830.

  • Antoine Dubuclet was born a free man to free parents and inherited a large sugar plantation from his father. He grew his small plantation to one of the largest sugar plantations in Louisiana. He owned over 100 slaves. He became extremely wealthy, so wealthy that he was the wealthiest black slave owner in Louisiana.

  • Another black slave owner was one of the largest slave owners in South Carolina as well as one of the wealthiest. He as born a slave but was luckier than most as he was bought by a white slave owner name William Ellison, who took the time to educate him. He was freed when he was 26 years old and took the name of his owner – William Ellison. But he made his wealth through being a “slave breeder” which was against the law in many Southern states. He secretly sold most of his slave females.

In 1830 about 13.7% (319,599) of the black population was free. Of these, 3,776 free Negroes owned 12,907 slaves, out of a total of 2,009,043 slaves owned in the entire United States. In 1830 there were almost 4,000 black slave owners who owned other black slaves!

What this shows is that some black individuals bought and sold other black individuals for profit. How would you answer the BLM rioter who justified the looters actions as "taking their reparations"? Not all black people were slaves. Some were free. Some were slaves to other blacks. Some whites were slaves. Some Chinese were slaves. Etc.

So, now you know that Systemic racism was first used by the communist Joe Feagin, whose goal was to abolish the White race. Feagin used his theory that asserts that the United States was founded in racism since the Constitution was founded in racism and that the legal recognition of slavery is based on races is a cornerstone of a racist social system. Feagin was a hater of the God of the Bible and is silent on what the WORD says. He has no knowledge of what nation the LORD God was king over. Do you think Feagin was a descendant of these people or was he a descendant of the people who were against the people that the LORD God was king?

But do you know who first used the following two words: racism and racist?

Racism

The word "racism" was first used by the Richard Henry Pratt in 1902. This word, racism, has only been around for a little more than a century. Who was Richard Pratt? Pratt was railing against the evils of racial segregation, claiming:

“Segregating any class or race of people apart from the rest of the people kills the progress of the segregated people or hinders their growth. Association of races and classes is necessary to destroy racism and classism.”

From 1879 until 1918, over 10,000 Native American children from 140 tribes attended Carlisle. Only 158 of them graduated.This was a reference to educate Native Americans. In 1879, Richard Henry Pratt opened a boarding school for Indian youth in Pennsylvania. The reason he opened the boarding school was to use education in order to uplift and assimilate the Indian youth into the mainstream of American culture.

From 1879 until 1918, over 10,000 Native American children from 140 tribes attended Carlisle. Only 158 of them graduated.  Only 158 out of over 10,000 graduated? What school would continue today if they had the same percent of graduates as Carlisle did—less than 2%.

Who was the most famous individual who attended Carlisle Industrial School for American Indians?

His father had an Irish father and a Sac and Fox Indian mother. His mother had a French father and a Potawatomi mother. He was raised as a Sac and Fox Indian and his native name meant “Bright Path.” His parents were both Roman Catholic a faith which this man from Carlisle observed throughout his adult life. His mother’s name was Charlotte Vieux and his fathers was Hiram Thorpe. The most famous student of Carlisle Indian School was the mongrel, Jim Thorpe.

The first person to use the word racism: Lieutenant Richard Henry Pratt, Founder, and Superintendent of Carlisle Indian School.Thorpe gained nationwide attention for the first time in 1911. His coach was the famous Glenn “Pop” Warner, who now has football leagues that are named after him. As a running back, defensive back, placekicker and punter, Thorpe scored all his team’s four field goals in an 18 -- 15 upset of Harvard, a top-ranked team in the early days of the National Collegiate Athletic Association. In 1912 Carlisle won the NCAA largely as a result of his efforts. That year they won 27-6 over Army. Do you know what famous person was on the losing Army team that game?

The Army football player that participated against Jim Thorpe was Dwight D. Eisenhower. A future General and future president of the United States. Thorpe later gained more fame as an Olympic winner.

So, as “systemic racism” was used by a communist whose goal was to abolish the White race, “racism” was used by a desegregationist who used the word that eventually destroyed segregation.

Racist

The word “racist” has been the single most effective fear-word in the leftist arsenal. This word, too, was unknown except for the last century. For decades, they have successfully used it in the political arena to slander traditionalist, shut down debate, and leave opponents running for cover. In the social arena, they have caused even more damage by using it to brainwash impressionable children and young college students, and to teach people to hate their nation, their cultural traditions, and worst of all, themselves.

How many people know who invented that word? Does anyone remember who Pastor Jim Jester said it was? Would it make any difference who it was? It was the first leader of the infamous Red Army, Leon Trotsky. Racist was first used by communist Leon Trotsky. Trotsky applied the word “racist” to Slavophiles who opposed Communism.

(1) “Systemic racism”, (2) “racism” and (3) “racist” were all words that were invented by opponents of racial segregation. It is the same strategy that was used when they added words like “jew” and “gentile” to the Bible as a substitute for “the southern kingdom of Judah” and the “northern kingdom of Israel”. Both Democrats and Republicans are integrationist. They both are against the former Jim Crow laws and the KKK. When President Trump said that he rejected the KKK since he was five years old, denounced David Duke, denounced all white supremacy groups; he tested positive for Covid-19 less than four hours later. They both brag that their party is the one that will give jobs to the minorities the best, help the black neighborhoods the best, and help the blacks, browns and mixed-seeds gain the equality that they have been missing for decades. Neither party is now on the side of our LORD God. They reject what the LORD God said about His people and their enemies.

And most of the churches are not either. They have been made into multi-cultural monstrosities. There was a very good reason that churches were the “most segregated places on Sunday mornings.”

So, who is to be the spokesmen for our LORD God? It is the church in which He is still the Head. It is the churches that still believe what they are told in the Bible.

Exodus 33:16“For wherein shall it be known here that I and Thy people have found grace in Thy sight? Is it not in that thou goest with us? so shall we be separated, I and Thy people, from all the people that are on the face of the earth.”

Leviticus 20:24“But I have said to you, You shall inherit their land, and I will give it to you to possess it, a land that flows with milk and honey: I am the LORD your God, which have separated you from other people.”

Leviticus 20:26“And ye shall be holy unto Me: for I the LORD am holy, and have severed you from other people, that ye should mine.”

1 Kings 8:53For You did separate them from among all the people of the earth, to be your inheritance, as you spoke by the hand of Moses your servant, when you brought our fathers out of Egypt, O LORD God.”

Israel was to be separated from all the people of the earth. Who separated Israel from all the other people who are in the earth? It was their LORD God. When did Israel’s LORD God tell Israel that they were to be tolerant and to “be the melting point of the world?” You won’t find any Scripture which teaches this.

Israel’s God told them to not only be separate, but to be intolerant to other gods. He told them to kill any racial stranger who came near His holy temple.

When king Herod had rebuilt the Temple in Jerusalem between 19 and 9 B.C., he enclosed the outer court with colonnades. The large separated area was where the non-Israelites were permitted to enter this great open courtyard of the Temple area. They could walk within in it, but they were forbidden to go any further than the outer court. They were excluded from entering any of the inner courts, and warning signs in Greek and Latin were placed giving strict warning that the penalty for such trespass was death.

The engraved block of limestone was discovered in Jerusalem in 1871. Its dimensions are about 22 inches high by 33 inches long. Each letter was nearly 1 1/2 inches high and originally painted with red ink against the white limestone. Josephus, a famous historian of the first century A.D., wrote about the warning signs in Greek and Latin that were placed on the barrier wall that separated the court from all other peoples. Its seven-line inscription reads as follows:

NO FOREIGNER IS TO GO BEYOND THE BALUSTRADE AND THE PLAZA OF THE TEMPLE ZONE WHOEVER IS CAUGHT DOING SO WILL HAVE HIMSELF TO BLAME FOR HIS DEATH WHICH WILL FOLLOW

If “no foreigner” [racial stranger] was forbidden to enter the inner court of the temple, why would a racial stranger be allowed to enter the church?

CONCLUSION

The Republicans are better than the Communists, secretly led by Bernie Sander’s rioters and burners in the Democratic Party. But, no matter what party wins, they will not save our nation. If the Democrats win, it will be over for the United States. If the Republicans win, it will take a little bit longer – but they are both on the socialist/communist road. It is because they both are not following all or even most of God’s law.

Sodomy and segregation are two issues that are not followed by either party, and there are more. We will discuss, usury with loans, the unholy seed that controls both parties and that they are haters of the God of the Bible and His people.

Numbers 23:9“For from the top of the rocks I see him, and from the hills I behold him: lo, the people shall dwell alone, and shall not be reckoned among the nations.”

Blessed be the LORD God of Israel.

To be continued.