People - Part 2

 
00:00

Sermon Notes of Pastor Mark Downey

July 9, 2017

Scripture Reading: Acts 10:34-43 “Then Peter opened his mouth, and said, Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons; but in each nation the man who fears Him and does what is right is acceptable to Him. He has sent this message to the sons of Israel, preaching good news of peace through Jesus Christ, who is Lord of all. You know the testimony which has spread throughout all of Judea, beginning in Galilee after the baptism that John preached; how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power, and how He went about doing good and healing all those injured by the false accuser, because God was with Him. And we are witnesses of all which He did both in the land of the Judeans and in Jerusalem, whom they then had killed, hanging upon a tree. This One God raised up on the third day, and caused Him to be seen, He was not seen by all the people, but by witnesses whom God had already chosen, we who ate and drank with Him after His resurrection from the grave. And He instructed us to proclaim and to affirm to the people that it is He who having been appointed by God as Judge of the living and the dead. Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone who believes in Him shall receive forgiveness of sins.

In today's reading from Acts 10, there are many words synonymous with 'people' having the same intent to direct our attention to the exclusivity of Israel in the Word of God. Words like persons, man, sons, all and everyone point to the same race of people. It should never be confused with jews or every biped upon the face of the earth, because it does not pertain to them. The Bible is racist book that has been deracinated by the enemies of Jesus Christ. An enemy hath planted weeds amongst the wheat. By trying to be inclusive of non-Israelites, they make one's belief in Christ a matter of cognitive dissonance; a confused state of mind, believing in two opposites at the same time, that is: us and them (Gen. 3:15) deserving of the same things reserved only for God's people. We'll talk about how salvation only applies to us and not them.

The idea of who Christ came for is imperative in understanding the Gospel message, which was Good News for “the lost sheep of the house of Israel”, and why White people gravitated to the Christian phenomenon exponentially. That's who the apostles went to and that's who heard the voice of Christ. They came to believe in Christ like fish to water and the sign of fish was an appropriate symbol of the early church. It really has never been that big of a deal for the impure world of mongrels, which is why they are likened to dogs, always sniffing around for crumbs, but not too keen on the loaf itself. So much money and time has been spent on a misguided 'great commission' of modern missionaries to savages in mud huts who care more about a lizard for dinner than a White man who was God and was the greatest story ever told to mankind. The misnomer of “the human race” just doesn't get it. There is no such thing. There is only Israel chosen of God. Even within Judea, the risen Christ was not seen by all the people, but rather by God's chosen people from within Israel. The primitive savages of the jungle were oblivious to the concept of a Messiah and still are to this day. They only pick and choose that which conforms to their ancestral traditions. We Israelites are all chosen, but the context is Israelite witnesses. “He was not seen by all the people, but by witnesses whom God had already chosen, we who ate and drank with Him after His resurrection from the grave.” All the witnesses who dined with the resurrected Christ were of the same race. That's a fact! There were no Judas' to betray Him. The witnesses were not an array of multicultural diversity. They were all the people of God.

Through the Abrahamic Covenant, God promised His people that He would “make you a great nation... and make your name great” (Gen. 12:2) and there is only one Great Britain that fulfills that Scripture. God said to Abraham, “My covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of many nations” (Gen. 17:4). It would only be in those particular God-fearing Covenant nations, that God's people, doing what is righteous, would be accepted and meet with God's approval. There was no favoritism by God among the 12 tribes of the White race. This could not be inclusive of other so called races, because they were neither a race (kind after kind) nor did they ever receive favor of any kind from God (consider God's regard or shall we say disregard for the Canaanites). Therefore, the premise of establishing the identity of 'people' is not everyone of any ethnic group who believes in the authority of Jesus, because God is not the “Lord of all” bipeds upon the face of the earth. What was the context of Acts 10:36? Here it is: “The word which God sent unto the children of Israel.”

Even if you don't believe the context in the same sentence, you cannot avoid the selectivity. Oh, you can avoid it, but you would be double-minded; the stuffing of hypocrisy. That's why universalists are such turkeys. Jesus said to the Canaanite woman just after He told her that He was only sent to Israel, that "It is not good to take the children's bread and throw it to the little dogs" (Mt. 15:26). He was not talking about literal bread or dogs. But, the metaphor and racial slur should not be lost that dogs are not people. Dogs, figuratively speaking in the Bible, means racial aliens. And bread is the Word of God. Jesus said, “I am the Bread of Life” (John 6:48). The undeniable context here is the granting of the bread of life to the children of Israel and not to the mongrel dogs. It is a matter of God assigning to various cultures of the earth their reception and reciprocation towards the divine. Some will be attracted, while others will be repelled. When Jesus said, “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me. And I give them eternal life, and they will never perish. No one can snatch them out of My hand” (John 10:27-18), it can only mean that there will be non-Israelites who can't hear His voice, can't follow Him, don't have eternal life and have never been in the hands of God. Only our race has ever been in the hands of God. "Behold, like the clay in the potter's hand, so are you in My hand, O house of Israel” Jer. 18:6.

Ancient Israel lost sight of who they were; that they were God's people. All the more reason for a Christian identity in this day and age. “I will be your God, and you shall be My people” (Lev 26:12). Only an enemy of God would even attempt to corrupt this arrangement. Only an idiot would agree to forfeit being one of God's people when there are no other “people”.  As we learned in Part 1, the word 'people' can only be defined as “those of Israel” in most of the 1710 verses of the Old Testament. So it is biblically incorrect to refer to black people or brown people or yellow people. They are simply black, brown and yellow.

The New Covenant took effect upon the death of our Lord upon the Cross. It put the Divine Law in our heart and mind (supernaturally). If the tribes of Africa and elsewhere were the people of God, then they too should have received an infusion of the Law, but by the time the missionaries got to them, nothing had changed for these primitives. And they had no excuse for not having a semblance of the moral law in the fiber of their culture, because there were no outside influences to cause an impediment. They were free to exercise the New Covenant without any interference. But, alas, they were not the people to whom the New Covenant was made for. Therefore, they were never qualified to be heirs of the promise nor a part of the resurrection.

If we learn anything from today's Scripture reading, it is shown that context is everything and that the Bible does not contradict itself. For example, in Acts 10:42, “And He commanded us to preach to the people and to testify that He is the one appointed by God to be Judge of the living and the dead.” By putting your spiritual blinders on, you could easily construe this passage to be universal outside the context of its immediate application and ignoring every single passage having to do with the resurrection. Atheists or modern Sadducees might try to derail this passage by saying, “Well, I thought the Lord was the God of the living and not the dead [Mark 12:27].” But, the context before and after this thought was “You do greatly err,” meaning it wasn't just a little mistake, it was huge! It was contrary to Scripture, which the previous verse (26) put into racial perspective; that is, it pertained only to the plans of the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob... the people of God.

At the time of the resurrection, Christ will judge those Israelites rising from the grave, but what about the living? I Cor. 15 is the chapter that explains there will be living and dead, that says, “We shall not all sleep [die], but we shall all be changed” (verse 51). Changed to what? Well, what was the corruption of Adam? He changed from immortal to mortal like all other life forms, including the genetic corruptions of those mongrel bipeds whom God could never call “good”, because God does not create mixed seed or half-breeds. The context of I Cor 15 can only be Adamic. The negro, the mestizo, the arab, the oriental, etc are completely absent from being judged by the God of the living and the dead, except for one little clue in I Cor. 15:39, to wit, “Not all flesh is the same flesh, but one flesh of man, and another flesh of beasts, and another of birds, and another of fish.” It's not that the corruption of mongrelization is equal to man, but rather the integrity of God's Creation is separating Adam/man from the rest of God's 'kind after kind' species of flesh. Hybrids are actually discounted from consideration. So indirectly, Paul is telling us that mongrelization is not part of God's plan for the ages. The “flesh of man” can only be the racial descendants of Adamkind. However, the subtle clue is allegorical with the word 'beast', implying the same kind of corruption found in the prophetic beast empires, promulgating the abomination of miscegenation and spoken of as fornication in I Cor. 10:8 (in reference to the actions of Phinehas in Numbers 25) and the “strange flesh” of Jude 7. True Christianity does not condone race mixing because it's death. “The last enemy that shall be destroyed is death” I Cor. 15:26. We're going to have to contend with this curse right up to the Day of the Lord. Our preterist friends must be living in lala land if they think the death knell of race mixing is no longer an enemy. They might as well join the universalists and pretend mongrels are people.

If “all Israel shall be saved” (Romans 11:26), then what does that say to non-Israelites? It says they will not be saved. It says in John 4:22 KJV “Salvation is of the Jews.” Of course, in Christian Identity we know that is a terribly misleading translation and should have been rendered “Salvation is from among the Judeans,” specifically the house of Judah residing in Judea who were White. Christ is the “The Lion of Judah” (Rev. 5:5). Much of the heraldry of Europe depicts the Lion and it can be directly traced to the people of the Bible. Judah became Germany and is why the jews have tried to demonize Germans and fill it full of arab refugees. Hitler had every justification for ridding the land of Edomite jews. These jews hated Positive Christianity, that is, National Socialism, because they were congenital fear mongers, unbelievers, abominable, murderers, whoremongers, sorcerers, idolaters and all of them liars. And we should do the same to rid our land of filthy jews... and we will. Jude 7 clearly makes the point that the “strange flesh” or non-Israelite will “set forth for an example, having received the judgment of eternal fire”. In other words, they will be judged by fire, not resurrection. It's not that they will be tormented in the catholic doctrine of Dante's Inferno, but that they will receive the Holocaust they never had to begin with. They will be destroyed forever, as if they never existed (Obadiah 1:16). Their judgment is different and separate from the White race. But, both might find themselves up a creek of fire without an extinguisher.

Which brings us to the idea of association. We've all heard of 'guilt by association' and sometimes it's true that we are convicted, that we must admit guilt for having a proximity to sin. That's why 24,000 Israelites died in Numbers 25:9. They knew who the offenders were and did nothing. In fact, they associated with them. I have been acquainted with many brethren who have been stuck in the quagmire of universalism and can't get out for some reason. I can see it, but they can't. And that is such a morbid tragedy, that they cling to the apostate church which they know is corrupt. They know it is an abomination unto God and yet they associate with the elements of apostasy. It really is cognitive dissonance and I'm not going to rehash the psychology today. But, it goes without saying that we are subjected to the machinations of Babylon daily and some people can withstand their propaganda and others bend the knee to Baal. There is nothing new under the sun. Our ancestors foolishly submitted to the idols of the heart also and so do we. The thing is: how do the people of God resist the non-people of satan? In other words, how do the racially pure separate themselves from the racially impure; from those who are natural born adversaries of God?

There are some advocates who say we cannot come out of Babylon until it falls per sequence in Rev. 18:2-4. But I contend that the first “fallen” of Babylon is the apostate church and it is now a done deal. The church is universal and contrary to God's people. There is only a Remnant and it's the overcomers of Christian Identity. The second “fallen” is the economy and it's not that far behind. Churchianity has fallen away from Christianity and therefore we are compelled to “come out of her, My people” (Rev. 18:4). The White race, true Israel, must withdraw from the establishment denominations for it no longer represents Jesus Christ. The only faith of our fathers is found in Christian Identity and the Elijah ministry to turn the hearts of the fathers to our children (Malachi 4:6). They (the wolves in sheep's clothing) “please not God, and are contrary to all men; hindering us from telling the nations how they may be saved” I Thes. 2:16. “And not only this, but also we ourselves, having the first fruits of the Spirit, even we ourselves groan within ourselves, waiting eagerly for our adoption as sons, the redemption of our body. For in hope we have been saved, but hope that is seen is not hope; for who hopes for what he already sees?” Romans 8:23-24. The church only sees a commission to save animals and mongrel/hybrids not created by God.

It behooves the people of God, who know who 'people' are, to forsake and separate themselves from the world of 'strange flesh' and any institution that promotes this curse upon our people that equivocates 'beasts' with whom God hath chosen. This is not just a good suggestion, it is Divine Law and the commandments of God to have nothing to do with the wicked. The wicked are purposefully designated as racial aliens in the Bible. “What agreement has the temple of God with idols? For we are the temple of the living God; as God said, I will make My dwelling among them and walk among them, and I will be their God, and they shall be My people. Therefore, come out from among unbelievers, and separate yourselves from them, says the Lord. Don't touch their filthy things, and I will welcome you” II Cor. 6:16-17. “Unbelievers” as we've learned in previous lessons, does not mean someone who does not believe in Christ, but is, in fact, a racial alien. Come out of multiculturalism. Come out of Mystery Babylon, “that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues” (Rev. 18:4). The context of 'unbelievers' is racial.

The antichrist jew is on the move to quash our movement by promulgating the notion that the word 'people' means everybody with two legs. We resist this notion vehemently. This is the great divide among White people; that we either refuse to separate ourselves from Babylon or we work for the advancement of the Kingdom. You cannot be for the Kingdom if you give the catholic mentality a free pass. What is that? Well, as I mentioned in a recent sermon, it's a mugwump. A mugwump is an unclean bird that sits on a fence with his mug on one side and his wump on the other. Over the years I have made the acquaintance of many ex-catholics, and yet they still have this reverence or regard for the so called Church. It's like a super glue that sticks to their soul no matter what. In recent years the RCC has been exposed for the rotten institution and menace it is to the White race, historically and contemporaneously. It's like nothing, no matter how evil, will dissuade our people from coming out of this pathetic religion of fraud until it's too late. Nothing I say will convince them. It will take the fervent prayer of saints for divine intervention to rearrange their brain cells and leave the satanic snare of universalism forever. For by their “sorceries were all nations deceived” Rev. 18:23.

Literally, the 'children' of Israel are their prey. The priestcraft of Rome is a protection racket for perverts. We are at a point in time where the giants of the earthly church(s) cannot hide their crimes. Even the giant media outlets, such as Reuters, have reported on hundreds of newly released documents, showing the Catholic Church of Milwaukee shielded and defended from prosecution numerous priests accused of pedophilia. And among the document dump: new revelations that New York’s archbishop helped shield the church from the financial hit it was taking from sexual abuse charges. The documents highlight legal testimony from Cardinal and Archbishop of New York Timothy Dolan, who appealed to the Vatican for counsel on the cases while he served as archbishop in Milwaukee from 2002 to 2009, according to Reuters. The paperwork spans 6,000 pages and details roughly 80 years of abuse cases. Some of the revelations: the Milwaukee archdiocese reassigned, rather than investigated, priests accused of sexual molestation to other churches. And at one point, then-Milwaukee Archbishop Dolan himself asked the Vatican to move $57 million to a trust fund to keep it from being taken in looming court action, to protect it “from any legal claim and liability.” The Vatican did approve the transfer, about a month later. Jeff Anderson, one of the attorneys representing 500 abuse victims, said that money was “to pay off some of the offenders to quietly go away." (http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/jul/2/new-yorks-cardinal-dolan-accused-shielding-pedophi)

There's been a minor debate in Christian Identity for years; that you can't be Identity and catholic at the same time. And that's true, because there's nothing universal about the 1st century apostolic church, which we emulate. The RCC wasn't even in existence until 300 years after Christ. In fact, you can't be Identity and judeo-Christian at the same time, because they're just as universal as catholics, or worse. You can't be a Christian if you serve two masters. “No servant can serve two masters. Either he will hate the one and love the other, or he will be devoted to the one and despise the other. You cannot serve both God and money" Luke 16:13. Cardinal Dolan and the Pope loved that $57 million more than emulating what Christ would have done. There's an estimated 320,000 churches in America and most of them are 501c3 corporate fictions created by the state. They can no longer claim God as their Creator, because their love for money is greater than their love for God. “For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments” I John 5:3. If anybody thinks Caesar or a Roman god is compatible with Christianity, they make the word of God of none effect. The religions of the beast empires served beasts, not people.

We, the people of God, are to have no association with the adversaries of God. In Esther 3:8 (NLT) we read the historical account of how the Persians regarded the 42,360 Judahites (mentioned in Ezra 2:64) in contradistinction to the great majority of Judah who preferred to stay in their comfort zone of universalism experienced during 70 years of Babylonian captivity. “Then Haman approached King Xerxes and said, There is a certain race of people scattered through all the provinces of your empire who keep themselves separate from everyone else. Their laws are different from those of any other people, and they refuse to obey the laws of the king. So it is not in the king's interest to let them live.” I picked the New Living Translation of this verse, because it had the guts to render “a certain people” as “a certain race of people.” They most surely were White Separatists being opposed by an empire of “other people,” who obviously had other gods.

The reason why we separate is because the righteous and the wicked cannot coexist (Mt. 13:49). It is better to separate now rather than later. “Be ye not unequally yoked together with unbelievers; for what fellowship hath righteousness with unrighteousness? and what communion hath light with darkness?” II Cor. 6:14. If you know what the word “unbeliever” means, you know this is racial. Remember Christ said “My sheep hear My voice” (John 10:27) and that can't get much more race specific; that is, “the lost sheep of the house of Israel” (Mt. 15:24). One cannot believe in Christ unless they can hear His voice. Christ told these satans, “But because you are not My sheep, you refuse to believe” John 10:26. He was addressing His adversaries who were the prevailing political power in Judea at that time; that is, the mixed seed of Edomites and Herodians. He couldn't have been talking to Israelites because John 10:27 continues “My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.” Those who could not hear Him were His mortal enemies and would kill Him and likewise those who dared to follow Him.

To illustrate, there's a feminist magazine called 'Medusa' that has an article titled 'The Solution to White Supremacy is White Abortion.' From the first sentence you can tell that the writer is a drone for cultural Marxism. “In a progressive society, it is often white families that stand in the way of equality and justice. Systemic white supremacy depends, first and foremost, on the white family unit. When white conquerors forcefully penetrated the indigenous, egalitarian homeland of the Native peoples of America, they were quick to replicate their white societies, initiating their parasitism by establishing white plantations, headed by white fathers, submissive white mothers, and, most critically, white children, with full dominion over the enslaved and oppressed people of color that were forced to uphold these micro-fiefdoms.

It is no surprise, then, that America’s fascination with the white family unit has gone hand-in-hand with the historical proliferation of white supremacy. After Bacon’s Rebellion, white micro-fieftans thought it necessary to expand the definition of white family to encompass the entirety of white society, so as to coerce the working class to fight amongst itself based on racial lines. Whites are embedded from birth with the sense of common white identity, and this identity conditions them to replicate the white family unit, thus furthering the cycle of white supremacy in America. That is why the white family unit must be destroyed.” And they call us “a hate group”? I shared this with you for entertainment purposes only, that such an antichrist scribe is proving my point that there is no such thing as “people of color”; just coloreds will suffice. They color the truth of history and reality.

The aforementioned is but one of thousands of examples of “people control”. However, there's one noticeable difference between them and us. The beast empires have always pretended to care about 'people', that is, White people, in order to be their masters. Just look at 'healthcare' (as if they cared about our health). 'Affordability' would not be a non sequiter; that is, a premise based on a fallacy, or should we say insanity. In Mystery Babylon, the big secret is a religious/economic consortium of jews and catholics to establish a one world government. If you don't join their unholy alliance, they will kill you. They only want compliant slaves who think they're free. White Supremacists and Identity Christians, on the other hand, only want the Kingdom of God with their own kind. We do not want to be like jews and catholics lording over the mongrels of the world. We have no interest in them being subjects of our eternal theocracy or society. The Kingdom of God is the opposite of British colonialism and imperialism of the 18th century, in which the sun never sets. It only brought grief to White people and wealth to a handful of shylocks and shysters.

What harmony is there between Christ and Belial? Or what does a believer have in common with an unbeliever?” II Cor. 6:15. There is nothing to share in the Word of God with racial aliens. Tell that to a universalist and watch them go ballistic. But, as we continue with Paul's admonition for the Corinthians to dissociate from pagans and the influence of Babylon, the message gets clearer.

And what agreement has the temple of God with idols? for you are the temple of the living God; as God has said, I will dwell in them, and walk in them; and I will be their God, and they shall be My people” II Cor. 6:16. Do you think that God is talking about dwelling and walking with negros 2000 years later? Perish the thought! There is only one people who God says are “My people”. "Therefore come out from among them and be separate, says the Lord. Touch no unclean thing, and I will receive you" II Cor. 6:17. Do you think Paul is telling them not to touch unsanitary objects? Well, that might be a good idea, but the “unclean thing” here is talking about the racially impure, a mongrel. How does one come out of road kill or a wood carving? What you cannot separate is the stranger from his strange gods. The “them” in verse 17 are filthy strangers, filthy jews, filthy black lives that don't matter to God. White Christian Israelites should have nothing to do with “them.” It's the same alien that we are commanded not to join together with in verse 14. We remain clean as long as we keep our family's genealogy racially pure.

There is no salvation for every biped upon the face of the earth. How could a savage cannibal removed from the jungle, all of the sudden repent from his unsavory culinary habits, among many other filthy practices, without the Law written in his heart and mind? How could they possibly be saved from their enemies when they are the enemy? Let me remind you that the New Covenant pertained only to Israel if we are to believe the two witnesses of Hebrews 8:8 and Jer. 31:31. If we are to understand Luke 1:71, it is imperative that we know who is “we”. “That we should be saved from our enemies, and from the hand of all that hate us.” This verse cannot pertain to everybody on earth. It only pertains to 'those of Israel' who have received the covenants and the adoption. How on earth could non-Israelite enemies, that hate the Son of God, be converted or saved if “Faith comes by hearing and hearing by the word of Christ” (Romans 10:17)?

Who are Israelites; to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God, and the promises” Romans 9:4. “For ye have not received the spirit of bondage again to fear; but ye have received the Spirit of adoption” Romans 8:15. The Spirit of adoption here means we receive the right attitude, maturing in Christ, in order to become the heirs of the Divine promise. When a father dies, he gives his estate to his son, not some stranger on another continent. It is our position with God that we are the genetic recipients for whom God chose. We are a fallen race of people, who by the grace of God, now have a remedy through the sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross for the forgiveness of sins. “Of Him all the prophets bear witness that through His name everyone [of Israel] who believes in Him shall receive forgiveness of sins.

There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit. For the law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death” Romans 8:1. This corresponds racially to Isaiah 45:25, “In the Lord shall all the seed of Israel be justified, and shall glory.” It does not say 'all the bipeds of the earth', does it? And yet most churches today give that which is holy to the dogs (Mt. 7:6). There is no law of the dogs, no matter how loud they bark. The two most frequently used Greek words for 'people' in the New Testament (#2992 and #3793) are fundamentally in keeping with the spirit of the Old Testament; that is, there is only one people of God, “a certain race of people” if you will.

If you're White, this message of love is for you. If you're not White, you'll never get it. If you're White and still don't get it, it's because you have the mentality of an unbeliever. You need to repent of the jew and antichrist heathen. His love is so exclusive, that Christ said “Truly, truly I say to you that I am the door of the sheep!... I am the Good Shepherd. The Good Shepherd lays down His life on behalf of the sheep!... I am the Good Shepherd and I know Mine and Mine know Me” John 10:7, 11, 14. It doesn't get any better than that; the symbiosis between God and His people. When we come out of the establishment churches and false gods of the fairy tale human race, and absolutely separate our body, mind and spirit from an enemy that hath planted noxious seed, the Lord will receive us. “And will be a Father unto you, and you shall be My sons and daughters, saith the Lord Almighty” II Cor. 6:18. Again in Rev. 21:3 we get a preview of coming events, “And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men [Adamkind], and He will dwell with them, and they shall be His people, and God Himself shall be with them, and be their God.” What a wonderful message for the people of God. God bless the White race.