The Shocking Origin of the Federal Government

compiled by Jim Jester

Is America a country with a government, or are we a Government with a country? The initiation of President Lincoln’s War in 1861 began a drastic change in American politics. His Gettysburg Address strongly hinted at this change (See article, Lincoln’s War against the Declaration), so much so that some have called his Address a “new constitution.” Ten years later, the Act of 1871 was passed. It appears this Act consolidated power and granted authority to subsequent Presidents (as CEO over a corporation) so they could continue Lincoln’s martial law and act as emperor. Thus, America no longer exists as intended by its founders and the Constitution is only a piece of wallpaper to keep the public fooled into thinking we live in a free country. Our nation now is, primarily, a Government with a country since it is the dominant Force, rather than a country with a government.

I have gathered the following articles for your perusal. I found various versions on the Internet of an article authored by Lisa Guliani, Country or Corporation! Act of 1871, posted Feb 5, 2011 at the Minnesota Tenth Amendment Center (.com). I did not see credit given to Lisa on these other versions so I am doing so now, for she has done a great service in educating Americans about the evil workings of our (alleged) government in this country. I have not reproduced her article here, but instead have given a slightly shorter version by Cathleen, From the Trenches World Report (.com), who has also brought in the British Crown and the Vatican into this conspiracy. Following this is an examination of the subject and related material from Team Law (.net) and The Missing 13th Amendment by Judge Dale.

Two Constitutions in the United States – The 1st was illegally suspended in favor of a Vatican “Crown” corporation in 1871.

Posted on January 2, 2014 by Cathleen

Vatican "Crown" Corporation

Presscore

Since 1871 the United States president and the United States Congress has been playing politics under a different set of rules and policies. The American people do not know that there are two Constitutions in the United States. The first penned by the leaders of the newly independent states of the United States in 1776. On July 4, 1776, the people claimed their independence from the Crown (temporal authority of the Roman Catholic Pope) and Democracy was born. And for 95 years the United States people were free and independent. That freedom ended in 1871 when the original “Constitution for the United States for America” was changed to the “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”.

The Congress realized that the country was in dire financial straits, so they made a financial deal with the devil – the Crown (a.k.a. City of London Corporation – est. by the Catholic Church on Jan 1, 1855 ) thereby incurring a DEBT to the Pope. The conniving Pope and his bankers were not about to lend the floundering nation any money without some serious stipulations. So, they devised a way of taking back control of the United States and thus, the Act of 1871 was passed. With no constitutional authority to do so, Congress created a separate form of government for the District of Columbia.

With the passage of “the Act of 1871” a city state (a state within a state) called the District of Columbia located on 10 sq. miles of land in the heart of Washington was formed with its own flag and its own independent constitution – the United States’ secret second constitution.

The flag of Washington's District of Columbia

The flag of Washington’s District of Columbia has 3 red stars, each symbolizing a city state within the three city empire. The three city empire consists of Washington D.C., City of London Corporation, and Vatican City State. City of London Corporation is the corporate center of the three city-states and controls the world economically. Washington D.C. is in charge of the military, and the Vatican controls it all under the guise of spiritual guidance. Although geographically separate, the city-states of, City of London Corporation, the Vatican and the District of Columbia are one interlocking empire called “Empire of the City.” The constitution for the District of Columbia operates under tyrannical Vatican law known as “Lex Fori” (local law). When congress illegally passed the act of 1871, it created a corporation known as THE UNITED STATES and a separate form of government for the District of Columbia. This treasonous act has unlawfully allowed the District of Columbia to operate as a corporation outside the original constitution of the United States and in total disregard of the best interests of the American citizens.

POTUS is the Chief Executive (President) of the corporation of THE UNITED STATES taking their orders from "The Crown"

POTUS is the Chief Executive (President) of the Corporation of THE UNITED STATES – operating as the CEO of the corporation. POTUS governs w/a Board of Directors (cabinet officials) and managers (Senators and Congressmen/women). Barack Obama, as others before him, is POTUS — operating as “vassal king” – taking orders once again from “The Crown” through the RIIA (Royal Institute of Intl. Affairs). The Illuminati (founded by the Society of Jesus or Jesuits, the largest Roman Catholic Religious Military Order headed by the Black Pope) created the Royal Institute of International Affairs (RIIA) in 1919. The American equivalent to the RIIA is the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). The RIIA and CFR set up Round Table Groups. What did the Act of 1871 achieve? The ACT of 1871 put the United States back under Crown rule (which is Vatican rule). The United States people lost their independence in 1871.

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is the constitution of the incorporated UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. It operates in an economic capacity and has been used to fool the People into thinking it governs the Republic. It does not! Capitalization is NOT insignificant when one is referring to a legal document. This seemingly “minor” alteration has had a major impact on every subsequent generation of Americans. What Congress did by passing the Act of 1871 was create an entirely new document, a constitution for the government of the District of Columbia, an INCORPORATED government.

Instead of having absolute and unalienable rights guaranteed under the organic Constitution, We the People, now have “relative” rights or privileges. One example is the Sovereign’s (the People) right to travel, which has now been transformed (under corporate government policy) into a “privilege” that requires citizens to be licensed – driver’s licenses and Passports. By passing the Act of 1871, Congress committed TREASON against the People who were Sovereign under the grants and decrees of the Declaration of Independence and the organic Constitution. The Act of 1871 became the FOUNDATION of all the treason since committed by government officials.

As of 1871, the United States isn’t a Country; It’s a Corporation! In preparation for stealing America, the puppets of Roman Catholic Pope’s banking cabal had already created a second government, a Shadow Government designed to manage what “the People” believed was a democracy, but what really was an incorporated UNITED STATES. Together this chimera, this two-headed monster, disallowed “the People” all rights of sui juris (you, in your sovereignty).

The U.S.A. is a Crown Colony. The U.S. has always been and remains a Crown (Roman Catholic Pope) colony. King James I is not just famous for translating the Bible into “The King James Version”, but for signing the “First Charter of Virginia” in 1606 — which granted America’s British forefathers license to settle and colonize America. The charter guaranteed future German Roman Catholic Kings/Queens of England would have sovereign authority over all citizens and colonized land in America.

After America declared independence from the Crown, the Treaty of Paris, signed on September 3, 1783 was signed.  That treaty identifies the German Roman Catholic King of England as prince of U.S. “Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick (Germany’s Brunswick) and Lunebourg (Germany’s Lunebourg), arch-treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire (Roman Catholic Church) etc., and of the United States of America”– completely contradicting the premise that America won The War of Independence.

Article 5 of that treaty gave all British estates, rights and properties back to the Crown – Catholic Church.

It is agreed that Congress shall earnestly recommend it to the legislatures of the respective states to provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects; and also of the estates, rights, and properties of persons resident in districts in the possession on his Majesty’s arms and who have not borne arms against the said United States. And that persons of any other decription shall have free liberty to go to any part or parts of any of the thirteen United States and therein to remain twelve months unmolested in their endeavors to obtain the restitution of such of their estates, rights, and properties as may have been confiscated; and that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states a reconsideration and revision of all acts or laws regarding the premises, so as to render the said laws or acts perfectly consistent not only with justice and equity but with that spirit of conciliation which on the return of the blessings of peace should universally prevail. And that Congress shall also earnestly recommend to the several states that the estates, rights, and properties, of such last mentioned persons shall be restored to them, they refunding to any persons who may be now in possession the bona fide price (where any has been given) which such persons may have paid on purchasing any of the said lands, rights, or properties since the confiscation.

And it is agreed that all persons who have any interest in confiscated lands, either by debts, marriage settlements, or otherwise, shall meet with no lawful impediment in the prosecution of their just rights.

It is becoming increasingly apparent to American citizens that government is no longer being conducted in accordance with the U.S. Constitution, or, within states, according to state constitutions. While people have recognized for more than 150 years that the rich and powerful often corrupt individual officials, or exert undue influence to get legislation passed that favors their interests, most Americans still cling to the naive belief that such corruption is exceptional, and that most of the institutions of society: the courts, the press, and law enforcement agencies, still largely comply with the Constitution and the law in important matters. They expect that these corrupting forces are disunited and in competition with one another, so that they tend to balance one another.

Mounting evidence makes it clear that the situation is far worse than most people think, that during the last several decades the U.S. Constitution has been effectively overthrown, and that it is now observed only as a facade to deceive and placate the masses. What has replaced it is what many call the Shadow Government – created with the illegal passing of the Act of 1871. It still, for the most part, operates in secret, because its control is not secure. The exposure of this regime and its operations must now become a primary duty of citizens who still believe in the Rule of Law and in the freedoms which this country is supposed to represent. – Cathleen

Commentary of Team Law

“Corp. U.S.” Myth 1: The District of Columbia Act of 1871 incorporated the municipal government of the District of Columbia into a municipal corporation.

From time to time people ask us questions similar to the following:

“An initial review of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 seems like it only incorporates a local government (like Chicago or Seattle); how do you get that they formed a private corporation?”

If you take the Act out of its historical context and, from the present, look to the Act, in the past, not knowing its history, then merely imagine who are the parties involved, you might agree with the presupposition that the Act merely incorporated a municipality.  However, such a review will not help you understand the meaning of any actual Act; thus, to best understand what actually happened we follow our “Standard for Review” to first discover the history behind the relationship; and, second, we look to the terms and conditions of the Act, by reviewing the Act itself, to see how it fits in accord with law and our history.

Thus, to understand the parties involved in the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 (hereinafter, “DCOA”), we must first understand who are the parties involved in the relationship as described by the Act.  We are not going to delve into the Act here, in its entirety; suffice it to say, looking over the situation, we find the Act is one made by the original jurisdiction government’s Congress, as set by the Constitution for the United States of America.  The DCOA describes its venue as: “all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia”.  The District of Columbia was originally provided for in the Constitution for the United States of America (Sept. 17, 1787) at Article 1 Section 8, specifically in the last two clauses.  Then, on July 16, 1790, in accord with the provisions of those clauses, the Territory was formed in the District of Columbia Act, wherein the “ten mile square” territory was permanently created and made the permanent location of the country’s government; that is to say, the “territory” so provided for included both the land and its actual government.  Under that Act, Congress also made the President the civic leader of the local government in all matters in said Territory.  Then, on February 27, 1801, under the second District of Columbia Act, two counties were formed and their respective officers and district judges were appointed.  Further, the established town governments of Alexandria, Georgetown and Washington were recognized as constituted and placed under the laws of the District, its judges, etc.  The United States Supreme Court has repeatedly called this Act (of, February 27, 1801) the “District of Columbia Organization Act” or the “Charter Act of the District of Columbia” and recognized it as the incorporation of the “municipality” known as the “District of Columbia”.  Then, on March 3, 1801, a Supplementary Act to that last Act, noted here, added the authority that the Marshals appointed by the respective District Court Judges collectively form a County Commission with the authority to appoint all officers as may be needed in similarity to the respective State officials in the states whence the counties Washington and Alexandria came, those being: Maryland and Virginia, respectively.

According to the United States Supreme Court those charter acts (first acts) were the official incorporation of the formal government (with its municipalities) of the District of Columbia as chartered by Congress in accord with the Constitution’s provision.  Again, the Supreme Court called that body of government “a corporation”, with the right to sue and be sued.  Respectively, since 1801, the District of Columbia has been consistently recognized as a “municipal corporation” with its own government.

That sets the basics for the first rule of our Standard for Review, ‘know the parties’.  What we have presented is sufficient to show the basics of who the parties are as they related to resolving the answer to the question above.  We admonish everyone to prove the facts for themselves by their own research.

The second rule from our Standard for Review is: “Then you must understand the environmental nature of the relationship.”  With that in mind let’s consider the events of the time: the Civil War had recently ended and the country was still under Lincoln’s Conscription Act (Martial Law).  Congress had at least three problems; they could see no way to directly cure by following the laws of the land (as constituted): they were out of funds, they had promised 40 acres of land to each slave that left the South to fight for the North and they had to reintegrate the south into the Union; which they could not do without controlling the appointment of the Southern States Congressional members. There were other problems; but these three stand out from the rest.  That is enough about the environment for the purposes of this review; however, the more you study the historical events of this time, the more obvious the relationships will become and the more proof you will amass to prove the facts of what actually happened.  In the interest of time, space and the topic of this response, we will move on.

The last step of the Standard for Review’s discovery process requires a review of the actual terms of the relationship.  Thus, we review the first paragraph of the DCOA; where Congress wrote:

That all that part of the territory of the United States included within the limits of the District of Columbia be, and the same is hereby, created into a government by the name of the District of Columbia, by which name it is hereby constituted a body corporate for municipal purposes … and exercise all other powers of a municipal corporation.

Given that even the Supreme Court confirms that the government of the District of Columbia was already “created into a government”, so formed into a municipal incorporation in 1801 under the District of Columbia Acts, we wonder, even with Congress’ constitutional authority to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District, how do you create, or incorporate, for the first time, a municipal government that has already been in existence as a municipal corporation for over 70 years?  The obvious answer is, “It’s impossible!”  There is no way to pass an “Organic Act” when the “Charter Act” is already in place, because the two words (organic and charter) have the same meaning—The First Act.

Though historians can make history appear to change by rewriting it for those unwilling to study the past from the actual records of the past.  Even Congress cannot change the actual history.  However, the records speak for themselves only if, and when, we study them.

When you consider the historical facts, the only meaning left for the terms given in the opening paragraph of the DCOA (and that which follows) is, the municipal corporation that was created is a private corporation owned by the actual government.  Further, the only government created in that Act was the same form of private government any private corporation has within the operation of its own corporate construct.  Thus, we coined the term, “Corp. U.S.”; to distinguish that corporation from the actual “original jurisdiction” government, as it was formed in accord with the Constitution for the United States of America.

We also note Congress reserved the right, granted them in said Constitution, to pass and enforce virtually any law within the District of Columbia; which is almost complete dictatorial authority over their Corp. U.S. construct, without regard for its internal operations or officers.  Thus, Congress can lawfully use Corp. U.S. as they see fit, within that portion of the ten-mile square defined as the District of Columbia.  Respectively (through that authority), the members of Congress now wore two hats; one hat for their original jurisdiction government official seat and a second more effective hat as a corporate board member titled with the same names: “Congressman”; “Representative” or “Senator”; the President also effectively wore two similar hats.

Thus, our historical records and laws clearly show that Corp. U.S. is not merely an incorporated municipality; rather, it is a private Corporation that was lawfully created by our original jurisdiction government.

We find no legal or lawful problem with the formation of Corp. U.S., as shown above. The Constitution provided Congress with the authority to pass any law within the ten mile square of the District of Columbia; however, with the creation of such a thing, the people would have to remain more vigilant to make sure that such a corporation was not used to extend authoritarian power beyond bounds of said District, to usurp authoritarian styled power over the people of the nation by force.

Of course, because the people failed to exercise such vigilance that is exactly what is happening today. Respectively, the only way to peacefully remedy this situation is the people must learn the law and apply it to restore our original jurisdiction government (see: Governor’s Corner).

Myth 11: The 50 star flag itself without the gold tassels, braids or other attachments is the proper flag of our nation

The fifty star flag was introduced by Corp. U.S. as the flag of the nation in the 1950s to recognize the entry of private corporations known as THE STATE OF ALASKA and THE STATE OF HAWAII into the corporate union (Corp. US) of STATE OF 'X' corporations.  It could not have been issued as a result of the Alaska and Hawaii Territories entering the Union of States of the United States of America because from the 1944 Bretton Woods Agreement forward Corp. U.S. was privately owned by a foreign power with a conflict of interest limiting it from issuing an Enabling Act that could allow a State to form. Further, there was no President of the United States of America then seated in the original jurisdiction government seat, whose signature is necessary to sign any valid Enabling Act for those territories to become such States. Further, there was no original jurisdiction national Congress seated at that time to generate such necessary Enabling Acts. Therefore, there are to this day only 48 States in the Union of States of the United States of America and the proper flag of our nation has only 48 stars on its jack. The 50 star flag is the proper flag of the President of Corp. U.S. and is properly used in his capacity as the Commander in Chief of the military forces of the United States of America, which are an original jurisdiction government body but they stand today under the assignment of Lincoln's martial law as the enforcers of that martial law, whose business needs are dictatorially controlled by Corp. U.S.’ President.

Historical Outline (by TeamLaw)

1st:   Martial Law is declared by President Lincoln on April 24th, 1863, with General Orders No. 100; under martial law authority, Congress and President Lincoln institute continuous martial law by ordering the states to either conscribe troops and or provide money in support of the North or be recognized as enemies of the nation; this martial law Act of Congress is still in effect today.  This martial law authority gives the President (with or without Congress) the dictatorial authority to do anything that can be done by government in accord with the Constitution of the United States of America.  This conscription act remains in effect to this very day and is the foundation of “Presidential Executive Orders” authority; it was magnified in 1917 with The Trading with the Enemy Act (Public Law 65-91, 65th Congress, Session I, Chapters 105, 106, October 6, 1917). and again in 1933 with the Emergency War Powers Act, which is ratified and enhanced almost every year to this date by Congress.  Today, these Acts address the people of the United States themselves as their enemy.

2nd:   The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871 created a private corporation (hereinafter “Corp. U.S.”, Trademark name, “United States Government”) owned and operated by the actual government for the purpose of carrying out the business needs of the government under martial law.  This was done under the constitutional authority for Congress to pass any law within the ten mile square of Washington, District of Columbia (link to PDF image file of the full 1871 Act).

3rd:   In said Act, Corp. U.S. adopted their own constitution (United States Constitution), which was identical to the national Constitution (Constitution of the United States of America) except that it was missing the national constitution’s 13th Amendment and the national constitution’s 14th, 15th and 16th amendments are respectively numbered 13th, 14th and 15th amendments in the Corp. U.S. Constitution.  At this point take special notice and remember this Corp. U.S. method of adopting their own Constitution, they will add to it in the same manner in 1913.

4th:   Corp. U.S. began to generate debts via bonds etc., which came due in 1912; but, they could not pay their debts; so, the 7 families that bought up the bonds demanded payment and Corp. U.S. could not pay.  Said families settled the debt for the payments of all of Corp. U.S.’ assets and for all of the assets of the Treasury of the United States of America.

5th:   As 1913 began, Corp. U.S. had no funds to carry out the necessary business needs of the government; so, they went to said families and asked if they could borrow some money.  The families said, “No.” (Corp. U.S. had already demonstrated that they would not repay their debts in full).  The families had foreseen this situation; and, had the year before finalized the creation of a private corporation of the name “Federal Reserve Bank”.  Corp. U.S. formed a relationship with the Federal Reserve Bank; whereby, they could transact their business via note rather than with money.  Notice that this relationship was one made between two private corporations and did not involve government (see: The Clearfield Doctrine); that is where most people error in understanding the Federal Reserve Bank system—again, except by contract with Corp. U.S., it has no government relation at all.  The private contracts that set the whole system up even recognize that; if anything therein proposed is found illegal or impossible to perform it is excluded from the agreements and the remaining elements remain in full force and effect.

6th:   Almost simultaneously with the last fact (also in 1913), Corp. U.S. adopts (as if ratified) their own 16th amendment.  Tax protesters challenge the IRS tax collection system based on this fact; however, when we remember that Corp. U.S. originally created their constitution by simply drafting it and adopting it, there is no difference between that adoption and this—such is the nature of corporate enactments.  You must also note that this amendment has nothing to do with our nation, with our people or with our national Constitution; which already had its own 16th amendment.  The Supreme Court ruled that it did nothing that was not already done other than to make plain and clear the right of the United States (Corp. U.S.) to tax corporations.  We agree; considering that the IRS was created under the authority of Corp. U.S.

7th:   Next (also 1913) Corp. U.S., through Congress, adopts (as if ratified) its 17th amendment.  This amendment is not only not ratified, it is not constitutional; the nation’s Constitution forbids Congress from even discussing the matter of where Senators are elected: which is the subject matter of this amendment.  According to the United States Supreme Court, for Congress to propose such an amendment they would first have to pass an amendment that gave them the authority to discuss the matter.

8th:   Accordingly, in 1914, the Freshman class and all Senators that successfully ran for reelection in 1913 by popular vote were seated in Corp. U.S. Senate capacity only; respectively, the original jurisdiction Senate seats from their respective States remained vacant; because, neither the State Senates nor the State Governors appointed new original jurisdiction Senators to replace them; which is still required by the national Constitution for placement of a national government Senator.

9th:   In 1917, Corp. U.S. enters W.W. I and passes their Trading with the Enemies Act.

10th:   In 1918, President Wilson is reelected by the Electoral College; but, Electoral College elections are required to be confirmed by the constitutionally set Congress; and,where the new Corp. U.S. only Senators were allowed to participate in the Electoral College vote confirmation, the only authority that could possibly have been used for electoral confirmation was limited to corporate only.  Therefore, President Wilson was not confirmed into office for his second term as the President of the United States of America; rather, he was only seated in the Corp. U.S. Presidential capacity as the President of the United States.  Therefore the original jurisdiction government’s seats were vacated because the people didn’t seat any original jurisdiction government officers.  It is important to note here that President Wilson retained his capacity as Commander in Chief of the military. Many people wonder about this fact imagining that such a capacity is bound to the President of the nation; however, When John Adams was President he assigned George Washington to the capacity of Commander in Chief of the military in preparation for an impending war with France.  During this period, Mr. Adams became quite concerned because Mr. Washington became quite ill and passed on his acting military authority through his lead General Mr. Hamilton; and, Mr. Adams was concerned that if war did break out Mr. Hamilton would use that authority as Commander in Chief to create a military dictatorship out of the nation.  Mr. Adams worked extra hard to, and, averted the war through diplomacy; and, the title of Commander in Chief was returned to the President.  (See: John Adams, by David McCullough, this book covers Mr. Adams concerns over this matter quite well.)

11th:   In 1933, Corp. U.S. is bankrupt; which forced what was called “a banking holiday” to exchange money backed Federal Reserve Notes with “legal tender” Federal Reserve Notes; accordingly, the Trading with the Enemies Act was adjusted to recognize the people of the United States of America as enemies of Corp. U.S.

12th:   In 1935, the Social Security Act was formed to provide Corp. U.S. the “excess capital” needed to at least start paying some of the interest Corp. U.S. owed in the bankruptcy.  Thereafter, if you were to ask the Social Security Administration for a relationship with their program (by filing an S5 form), they would [with the express purpose of generating Beneficiary funds to United States General Trust Fund (GTF) the Social Security Administration] create an entity with a name (that sounds like your name but is spelled with all capital letters) and an account number (Social Security number).  They give you the Social Security card and let you know that the card does not belong to you but you are to hold it for them until they want it back.  If you are willing to accept that responsibility over the card you activate the card by signing it, which gives you the ability to act as the fiduciary for the cards actual owner Corp. U.S. and you can use the card’s name and number to thus, transact business relations for the card’s actual owner.  You are also to note that though the card verifies its agency (you as the single person with authority to control the entity so created) it is not for use as identification.  On review: notice the Social Security Administration was the creator of the entity (cardholder), they offered you the opportunity to serve its Trustee capacity (by lending it actual consciousness and physical capacity), they gave you something (the card) that does not belong to you to hold in trust and they reserved the actual owner of the thing (Corp. U.S.) as the beneficiary of the entity—by definition, this only describes the creation and existence of a Trust.  More importantly: the name they gave this Trust is not your name, the number they gave the Trust is not your number and your lending actual consciousness and physical capacity to this Trust’s Trustee capacity does not limit you or your capacity to separately act in your natural sovereign capacity in any way—what you do, when you do it and how you do it is still totally up to you (see: Corp. U.S’. Myth 9).

13th:   In 1944, under the Bretton Woods Agreement, Corp. U.S. granted the International Monetary Fund (hereinafter, "IMF") drawing account access to the United States Treasury in exchange for the Corp. U.S. President acquiring control over the governors and general managers of the IMF; respectively, making Corp. U.S. a foreign controlled private corporation.

14th:   In 1962, considering the states were forced to carry out their business dealings in terms of Federal Reserve Notes (foreign notes), which is forbidden in the national and State constitutions, out of that necessity, the states began protecting themselves from the people by forming corporations like Corp. U.S.  Accordingly, those newly formed corporate state administrations began adopting Corp. U.S. suggested uniform codes and licensing structures that allowed better and more powerful control over the people, which thing the original jurisdiction governments of this nation had no capacity to do.  Our Constitutions secure that the governments do not govern the people; rather, they govern themselves in accord with the limits of Law as it is derived from the people through the constitutions.  The people govern themselves.  Such is the foundational nature of our Constitutional Republic.

15th:   By 1972, every State government in the union of States had formed such private corporations (hereinafter, “Corp. State”), in accord with the IMF’s admonition; and, the people ceased to seat original jurisdiction government officials in their State government seats.

The Bottom Line: when you speak about these private foreign corporations remember that is what they are and stop calling them government.

Further, it is very important that we stop trying to fix them; instead, hold them accountable to the law that already exists [see: “Call to Action”).  Even more important we must reseat our original jurisdiction government and spread the word about the truth.  By reseating our State and national governments in their original jurisdiction nature, we gain the capacity to hold these private foreign corporations accountable.  They owe us a lot of money, in fact they owe us more money than there is available in the world.  In fact, it is impossible for them to pay and that gives us the leverage we need to take back our nation and put things right.  The process is a simple one.  The difficulty is in getting our people to wake up to the truth.  That’s why we ask you to prove the truth for yourself and contact us with your discovery.

That means, you must stop acting and communicating like you are anything other than the sovereign you were created to be.  And, stop referring to Corp. U.S. or the STATE OF 'X' as anything other than the private foreign corporations that they are.  And, finally, stop listening to the Bigfoot Patriot Mythology that is espoused by those that only give these facts lip service.

It’s time to wake up and follow the truth, time to repent and become a moral and honorable society instead of lauding our Piety while we stand guilty of: a) not knowing the truth; b) not living the truth; c) believing God will save us even though we have the tools to know the truth and the ability to use those tools but we refuse to live by the truth and use the tools we have—to save ourselves and thereby remain free.

The biggest problem with that: people tend to get all excited about uniting against the tyranny of Corp. U.S., then while remaining blind to the truth and having no real remedy, they fall prey to patriot mythologists, agent provocateurs and predatory marketers and are convinced to bail out of “the system”, hell bent for a rebellion even scripture says cannot be won with conventional weapons of war.

Would that we could instead follow the admonition of the King of Kings and unite to learn the truth and the law; then peacefully reseat our original jurisdiction government by following the law.  It really is just that simple.

Corp. U.S. is not our actual government, rather it is a private foreign corporation that most businesses and people have contracted with to carry out their business relations (either not knowing what they were doing or not knowing any other way to survive).  Like in any other corporation, Corp. U.S. is the government within the confines of its own contractual relations; but that still does not make it the government of our country.

The solution to our problem in Amerika is not a civil revolution; that would only give Corp. U.S. the excuse to further seize power; all we need to do is re-seat the original jurisdictional government in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ.

For more information go to TeamLaw.net

The Missing 13th Amendment

On or about March 20, 2013, the New Hampshire Legislature passed HB 638, recognizing Article XIII, known by few as: “The Missing 13th Amendment,” missing from the organic Constitution of the United States of America. The legislative analysis offered described a trite but secret history of this mystical amendment, which I have encapsulated as follows:

During the American Civil War, the country was under Marshal Law by President Lincoln and after the War, Lincoln’s policies were to be abated and everything was supposed to return to normal; but it didn’t happen quite that way. Congress passed the Organic Act of 1871, which created a government corporation within the District of Columbia, called: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. This new government corporation replaced the Municipal Charter for the District of Columbia, a move that egregiously led to the fraudulent rewrite and adoption of what appeared to be the organic American Constitution. This erroneous rewrite is described as a corporate “mission statement” with the original 13th Amendment “omitted” and it was this Constitutional rewrite that was inadvertently published for all to see.

Members of royalty, PhD’s, lawyers, squires and bankers, “Titles of Nobility,” have left a historic wake of deceit, destruction and corruption behind them on this planet. I would like to believe it was the majority intent of the Founding Fathers and the first federal convention to shield America from those proven elements of destruction and corruption. In so doing they proposed and ratified several amendments, one being Article XIII or the 13th Amendment, specifically designed to bar candidates who held such “Titles of Nobility,” from ever holding a seat in government! Each year since 1871, Lincoln’s Martial Law has been renewed by Congress and currently; all state and federal governments are dominated by legislators with “Titles of Nobility.” What was once regarded as a service to country is now a political career.

“In politics, nothing happens by accident. If it happens at all, you can bet it was planned that way.” - Franklin D. Roosevelt

The described “omission” of Article XIII [the missing 13th Amendment] and the “mission statement” – the fraudulent copy of the organic constitution – initiates the following ten questions, which I answer as succinctly as I can.

1: How do you “omit” a Constitutional Article when they are all sequentially numbered?

Obviously, this is a lawyer’s response by the New Hampshire Legislature because you cannot simply “omit” a Constitutional Amendment. They are sequentially numbered.

The original Article XIII was intentionally and methodically removed from existence, which took a number of years to complete and was NOT simply “omitted.” It required a conspiracy; a federal rewrite; the removal of all former texts and references to the original Article XIII and the domination of all the

various state government legislatures by candidates holding “Titles of Nobility,” who would be willing to save their careers at any cost. This was all intentional on their part to complete and sustain its demise.

2: Why didn’t Lincoln’s Martial Law policies abate and the government return back to normal following the Civil War?

The federal government for the American Republic had imploded when the southern states decided to secede from the Union and walk out while Congress was still in session. Absent the presence of those southern state delegates, Congress could not adjourn and could not move forward for lack of a quorum! President Lincoln became the federal law under martial law until a new federal government could be assembled.

3: President Lincoln was a lawyer, a Title of Nobility, and several delegates and predecessors’ were lawyers. How can that be, given that the original 13th Amendment prohibited persons possessing a “Title of Nobility” from ever holding a seat in government and given that the 13th Amendment had not been “omitted” until 1871?

The truth is the American Republic never enjoyed a Constitutional government, beginning with the election of George Washington. George took office one year before the Constitution permitted. He subsequently:

  • overthrew the organic Constitution
  • reinstated the British-owned Virginia Colony Corporation
  • altered the Oath of Office requirements
  • installed a corporate military government in

place of a civilian government and replaced the Common Law with a commercial law known as “Admiralty” or “the law of the sea.” George then declared that: “All of America is now under water!”

George was a 32nd Degree Freemason and a descendant of William, the Prince of Orange, the Sovereign King of America, according to the signed copy of the “Paris Treaty of 1783.” This gave him the notion that he too could become King of America.

We have been taught to think and believe that George Washington was this great military man of honor, a hero and “The father of this country.” If you were a Congressman and part of that great political conspiracy squirreling away approximately three to four million a year, you might be inclined to believe that hogwash. But in actuality George was the first traitor to the American Republic. He was memorialized by Congress in the Washington Monument, a 555 foot tall sea level obelisk, representing that “America is now under water!”

4: Why was President Lincoln forced to declare martial law and exercise Executive Privilege to create policy during and after the Civil War, when martial law was always intended to be a temporary solution?

Martial law was imposed rather than admit that the Union was dissolved. Under martial law the Executive branch executed federal edicts until the Executive branch and Congress regrouped. War was declared as a distraction. (As an aside) the Civil War was never about the slave question. What we learned in school concealed

the truth that the Union was dissolved. Hiding that truth makes Lincoln the second traitor to the American Republic.

I cannot find any evidence to support my belief that southern state governments were a part of this grand conspiracy. However, their secession and attack on Fort Sumter was both convenient and timely. And, when the southern delegates rejoined the corporate federal government they shared in the fruit of the piracy of American labor and industry.

5: Why did Congress feel the need to renew Lincoln’s Order of Marshal Law, every year since the Civil War?

The federal government has committed an ongoing treason against the American Republic from day one. The organic Constitution would have severely restricted Congress and the President. Under martial law, those restrictions are suspended, which in turn grants the Corporate “alleged” President the power of Executive Privilege to create policy without Congressional oversight. Since Martial law can only be invoked during War or during Acts of Civil disobedience, the corporate federal government has obviously declared War upon the American Republic ever since 1781. Hence, their reason to renew Lincoln’s Martial law each year.

By 1933, the Roosevelt Administration passed the Emergency Banking Act. Concealed within this act is a modification of the Trading with the Enemy Act, wherein Congress has declared that the American people are the enemy of the federal government. Also concealed within this Act, Roosevelt dissolved the Virginia Colony Corporation.

6: How could Congress pass the Organic Act of 1871, when the US Constitution absolutely prohibited government corporations?

The Organic Act set the stage for a new federal corporation and prevented the Lincoln Administration from having to disclose to the American public that the federal government was dissolved and never was constitutional, which would have exposed that the Civil War was used as a distraction and Treasonous solution to their problem.

I believe that Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address was completely heartfelt and was the act of a repentant man who felt totally responsible for all the death and destruction that had occurred. I also believe that a guilt ridden Lincoln constantly placed himself in harms way, hoping that he would be dispatched with prejudice.

7: Why did Congress feel the need to create a new Municipal Charter for the District of Columbia?

Had Congress disclosed that secession by the south had legally dissolved the federal government, the American public probably would have demanded that a new Constitutional government be created, with new elections held because of a lack of faith in the previous delegates and that would have destroyed their federal careers; positions of power and visions of grandeur. So the Organic Act was passed and a new commercial corporation created having a Constitutional appearance and reference (i.e.) United States Of America, under which was concealed the original private foreign Virginia Colony Corporation. Under this new corporation, all of them could profit from the commercial piracy of American labor and industry.

8: Why did Congress copy and modify the organic Constitution to create a “mission statement”?

Congress was better able to maintain the “illusion” of a constitutional government for the American Republic, by using and modifying the organic Constitution as a “mission statement” without officially touching the organic Constitution. The federal officials regarded this plan as plausible deniability and business as usual. All they ever had to claim was that a mistake had been made by omitting Article XIII. Congress’s new “mission statement” can also be easily modified to suit their collective preference without convening a Constitutional Convention. Hence: The adoption of the Civil Rights Act and Tax Laws, etc. were all a corporate ruse. It was the corporate “mission statement” that was actually being modified by all their new amendments and NOT the organic Constitution and this is how it appears lately that Congress has unlawfully repealed several Constitutional amendments without convening a Constitutional Convention. Everything that has happened in government during the past 224 years has been an “illusion” and the original organic Constitution remains in tact and valid. Every four years The US Printing Office reprints the organic Constitution, the Articles of Confederation, the Declaration of Independence and the Northwest Territorial Treaty. These four documents are the laws of the land or the foundation of all American law and can be researched at the US Printing Office.

9: Why was this “mission statement” published and taught by all government controlled public and parochial schools, as the one and only organic Constitution of America?

The purpose behind this decision and their procuring educational control, was to dumb down the American public and control what we are taught, know and believe using fraudulent information and various other constructive forms of propaganda through altered publications, the media, the press and movies. The organic Constitution needed stricter controls but would have actually prevented the federal usurpation, propaganda, oppression, fraud, commercial slavery and theft that has occurred throughout the years. But Americans did not notice what was happening and placed far too much trust in their elected representatives. In all fairness, we were a nation of immigrants and the bulk of our ancestors were illiterate. So it was actually quite easy for Congress to carry out this usurpation and conspiracy.

10: Up to the year 1871, why is it that out of the sixteen US Presidents, who had previously served, was Washington and Lincoln, the only US Presidents memorialized by the Congress?

The corrupt Washington and Lincoln’s administrations did the most to undermine the American Republic and further the goals of the private foreign corporate partnership and their commercial piracy of American labor and industry. That made Washington and Lincoln heroes in the eyes of Congress. The nobility regard the citizenry as slaves and we are conditioned to celebrate their beliefs, holidays and heroes. How could this have happened, you ask. Certainly, somebody should have caught on to this federal plot before now. Well they did, and all it took was a little government propaganda claiming these individuals were mentally ill, or drug dealers, or involved in a terrorist organization and plot to destroy this country. Once that is done the authorities use government agencies like the FBI to place these clear-seeing individuals into custody on false charges. Soon everyone stops paying attention to the message and evidence these patriots exposed. Still don’t believe that this was all possible? Well, consider this: What is the first thing we do when a baby cries? We distract them with funny faces, baby talk, rocking or play peek-a-boo. When we discover the right distraction the baby stops crying. This is exactly how state and federal politicians “handle” us. The three best distractions they discovered are “fear, debt and war.” These traitors don’t do anything in a hurry because time is always on their side. Some of their plans have taken more than one hundred years to fulfill. Some will never be fulfilled. But even that has never deterred them.

The “Slave Question” And “Lincoln’s Election”

In 1860 the “slave question” and “Lincoln’s election” divided a nation. This division set the stage for conspirators to create a new private foreign corporation designed to:

  • convert the federal government into a business
  • pirate America’s labor and industry.

The plan was to divert public attention via a distraction consisting of fear, debt and war.

What happened:

  • the South seceded
  • the federal government imploded
  • martial law was imposed and Lincoln suddenly

enjoyed dictatorial power by and through “Executive Privilege.” [Sounds like today!]

  • Fort Sumter was attacked
  • War was declared. Patriotism and prejudice was force fed the American public. Fear, debt and war created hardship for the Republic while commerce flourished and filled the pockets of politicians and the European royal and elite owners of the Virginia Colony Corporation.

During all this distraction the private foreign corporation called United States of America was created and filed. The organic Constitution was copied as a corporate “mission statement,” absent Article XIII. Both replace the Municipal Charter for the District of Columbia. All that remained was to destroy all copies and references to the organic 13th Amendment and then convince the American public that this fraudulent rewrite was the one and only Constitution of the United States of America. Checkmate.

This devious example became a paradigm for all future historic events. The New Hampshire Legislature was coy and subtle in their recent effort at transparency. It suggested the removal of Article XIII (the missing 13th Amendment) was merely an “omission” and that the fraudulent Constitutional rewrite in 1871 was intended to be used only as a corporate “mission statement” for the District of Columbia. Obviously some habits are hard to break.

What they haven’t said is we Americans are really sovereign and that all American governments, courts and agencies are unconstitutional private for profit foreign corporations. These corporations have absolutely no authority or jurisdictional power over the sovereign American republic. The Supreme Court admitted this in the year 2000, in Bond v. United States, 529 US 334, 2000. The government- controlled media swept it neatly under the carpet.

In an attempt to avoid repercussions, the government presented a false case and decision titled US v. Bond before the federal appeals court. This reversed the US Supreme Court. There is, of course, no body of law that can reverse the US Supreme Court. It’s the highest court in America even under their corporate regulations. I choose to believe that these New Hampshire legislators are subtly circumventing a nefarious history in which they and their brotherhood continue to play an integral part. I also believe that the members of that state legislature now foresee their future arrest, loss of liberty and political demise and that this recent attempt at transparency is actually an intelligent attempt to solicit some degree of leniency and forgiveness from the American public. You be the judge.

Blessings, Judge Dale, retired

[From stopthecrime.net]